Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Mendiburu, Andrés Z., de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248112
Resumo: The present article a natural gas combined cycle thermoelectric power plant, without/with supplementary fuel burning (SFB), was evaluated through an energetic, exergetic, environmental and economic analysis. The objective of this research is to show that the lower energy production related to the system without SFB is compensated by the higher environmental efficiency. The evaluations were carried out to determine the global efficiency and the energy benefits/losses from the different equipment. The environmental analysis determined all emissions, pollution indicator (Πg), and ecological efficiency (ε) considering the international air quality standards. Finally, the economic analysis determined the expected annual benefit due to the pay-back and the electricity production cost (PCEE), incorporating the effects of the environmental impacts. When developing the present study, the system without/with SFB evidenced a global efficiency of 50.81 % vs 47.39 %, respectively. In addition, the system without SFB showed better results of exergetic efficiency and irreversibility, its Πg and ε were 0.056 kg/MJ and 93.2 %. While its total emissions were 16 % lower. The economic analysis verified the annual benefit due to the pay-back for an annual interest rate of 4 %, 8 % and 12 %, and the PCEE showed an increase between 10 % and 12 % in the case with SFB.
id UNSP_ccad74abd752aaa9c5db4a12f53de1cf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/248112
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burningCombined cycleEcological efficiencyElectricity production costSupplementary fuel burningThermoelectric power plantThe present article a natural gas combined cycle thermoelectric power plant, without/with supplementary fuel burning (SFB), was evaluated through an energetic, exergetic, environmental and economic analysis. The objective of this research is to show that the lower energy production related to the system without SFB is compensated by the higher environmental efficiency. The evaluations were carried out to determine the global efficiency and the energy benefits/losses from the different equipment. The environmental analysis determined all emissions, pollution indicator (Πg), and ecological efficiency (ε) considering the international air quality standards. Finally, the economic analysis determined the expected annual benefit due to the pay-back and the electricity production cost (PCEE), incorporating the effects of the environmental impacts. When developing the present study, the system without/with SFB evidenced a global efficiency of 50.81 % vs 47.39 %, respectively. In addition, the system without SFB showed better results of exergetic efficiency and irreversibility, its Πg and ε were 0.056 kg/MJ and 93.2 %. While its total emissions were 16 % lower. The economic analysis verified the annual benefit due to the pay-back for an annual interest rate of 4 %, 8 % and 12 %, and the PCEE showed an increase between 10 % and 12 % in the case with SFB.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Mechanical Engineering Faculty São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Ariberto P. Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SPDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), R. Sarmento Leite 425, Porto Alegre - RSInternational Research Group for Energy Sustainability (IRGES), R. Sarmento Leite 425, Porto Alegre - RSMechanical Engineering Faculty São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Ariberto P. Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SPFAPESP: 2017/08975-1Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)International Research Group for Energy Sustainability (IRGES)Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP]Mendiburu, Andrés Z.de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP]2023-07-29T13:34:46Z2023-07-29T13:34:46Z2023-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, v. 38.2451-9049http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24811210.1016/j.tsep.2022.1016232-s2.0-85145254629Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengThermal Science and Engineering Progressinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-01T20:32:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/248112Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:08:35.600762Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
title Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
spellingShingle Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP]
Combined cycle
Ecological efficiency
Electricity production cost
Supplementary fuel burning
Thermoelectric power plant
title_short Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
title_full Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
title_fullStr Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
title_full_unstemmed Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
title_sort Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
author Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP]
author_facet Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP]
Mendiburu, Andrés Z.
de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Mendiburu, Andrés Z.
de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
International Research Group for Energy Sustainability (IRGES)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP]
Mendiburu, Andrés Z.
de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Combined cycle
Ecological efficiency
Electricity production cost
Supplementary fuel burning
Thermoelectric power plant
topic Combined cycle
Ecological efficiency
Electricity production cost
Supplementary fuel burning
Thermoelectric power plant
description The present article a natural gas combined cycle thermoelectric power plant, without/with supplementary fuel burning (SFB), was evaluated through an energetic, exergetic, environmental and economic analysis. The objective of this research is to show that the lower energy production related to the system without SFB is compensated by the higher environmental efficiency. The evaluations were carried out to determine the global efficiency and the energy benefits/losses from the different equipment. The environmental analysis determined all emissions, pollution indicator (Πg), and ecological efficiency (ε) considering the international air quality standards. Finally, the economic analysis determined the expected annual benefit due to the pay-back and the electricity production cost (PCEE), incorporating the effects of the environmental impacts. When developing the present study, the system without/with SFB evidenced a global efficiency of 50.81 % vs 47.39 %, respectively. In addition, the system without SFB showed better results of exergetic efficiency and irreversibility, its Πg and ε were 0.056 kg/MJ and 93.2 %. While its total emissions were 16 % lower. The economic analysis verified the annual benefit due to the pay-back for an annual interest rate of 4 %, 8 % and 12 %, and the PCEE showed an increase between 10 % and 12 % in the case with SFB.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-29T13:34:46Z
2023-07-29T13:34:46Z
2023-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, v. 38.
2451-9049
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248112
10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623
2-s2.0-85145254629
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248112
identifier_str_mv Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, v. 38.
2451-9049
10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623
2-s2.0-85145254629
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129024217579520