Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248112 |
Resumo: | The present article a natural gas combined cycle thermoelectric power plant, without/with supplementary fuel burning (SFB), was evaluated through an energetic, exergetic, environmental and economic analysis. The objective of this research is to show that the lower energy production related to the system without SFB is compensated by the higher environmental efficiency. The evaluations were carried out to determine the global efficiency and the energy benefits/losses from the different equipment. The environmental analysis determined all emissions, pollution indicator (Πg), and ecological efficiency (ε) considering the international air quality standards. Finally, the economic analysis determined the expected annual benefit due to the pay-back and the electricity production cost (PCEE), incorporating the effects of the environmental impacts. When developing the present study, the system without/with SFB evidenced a global efficiency of 50.81 % vs 47.39 %, respectively. In addition, the system without SFB showed better results of exergetic efficiency and irreversibility, its Πg and ε were 0.056 kg/MJ and 93.2 %. While its total emissions were 16 % lower. The economic analysis verified the annual benefit due to the pay-back for an annual interest rate of 4 %, 8 % and 12 %, and the PCEE showed an increase between 10 % and 12 % in the case with SFB. |
id |
UNSP_ccad74abd752aaa9c5db4a12f53de1cf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/248112 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burningCombined cycleEcological efficiencyElectricity production costSupplementary fuel burningThermoelectric power plantThe present article a natural gas combined cycle thermoelectric power plant, without/with supplementary fuel burning (SFB), was evaluated through an energetic, exergetic, environmental and economic analysis. The objective of this research is to show that the lower energy production related to the system without SFB is compensated by the higher environmental efficiency. The evaluations were carried out to determine the global efficiency and the energy benefits/losses from the different equipment. The environmental analysis determined all emissions, pollution indicator (Πg), and ecological efficiency (ε) considering the international air quality standards. Finally, the economic analysis determined the expected annual benefit due to the pay-back and the electricity production cost (PCEE), incorporating the effects of the environmental impacts. When developing the present study, the system without/with SFB evidenced a global efficiency of 50.81 % vs 47.39 %, respectively. In addition, the system without SFB showed better results of exergetic efficiency and irreversibility, its Πg and ε were 0.056 kg/MJ and 93.2 %. While its total emissions were 16 % lower. The economic analysis verified the annual benefit due to the pay-back for an annual interest rate of 4 %, 8 % and 12 %, and the PCEE showed an increase between 10 % and 12 % in the case with SFB.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Mechanical Engineering Faculty São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Ariberto P. Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SPDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), R. Sarmento Leite 425, Porto Alegre - RSInternational Research Group for Energy Sustainability (IRGES), R. Sarmento Leite 425, Porto Alegre - RSMechanical Engineering Faculty São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Ariberto P. Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SPFAPESP: 2017/08975-1Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)International Research Group for Energy Sustainability (IRGES)Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP]Mendiburu, Andrés Z.de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP]2023-07-29T13:34:46Z2023-07-29T13:34:46Z2023-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, v. 38.2451-9049http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24811210.1016/j.tsep.2022.1016232-s2.0-85145254629Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengThermal Science and Engineering Progressinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-01T20:32:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/248112Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-07-01T20:32:30Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning |
title |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning |
spellingShingle |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP] Combined cycle Ecological efficiency Electricity production cost Supplementary fuel burning Thermoelectric power plant |
title_short |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning |
title_full |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning |
title_fullStr |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning |
title_sort |
Energy production and effect of ecological efficiency on the electricity production cost of a combined cycle without/with supplementary fuel burning |
author |
Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP] Mendiburu, Andrés Z. de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mendiburu, Andrés Z. de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) International Research Group for Energy Sustainability (IRGES) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mariños Rosado, Diego J. [UNESP] Mendiburu, Andrés Z. de Carvalho, João A. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Combined cycle Ecological efficiency Electricity production cost Supplementary fuel burning Thermoelectric power plant |
topic |
Combined cycle Ecological efficiency Electricity production cost Supplementary fuel burning Thermoelectric power plant |
description |
The present article a natural gas combined cycle thermoelectric power plant, without/with supplementary fuel burning (SFB), was evaluated through an energetic, exergetic, environmental and economic analysis. The objective of this research is to show that the lower energy production related to the system without SFB is compensated by the higher environmental efficiency. The evaluations were carried out to determine the global efficiency and the energy benefits/losses from the different equipment. The environmental analysis determined all emissions, pollution indicator (Πg), and ecological efficiency (ε) considering the international air quality standards. Finally, the economic analysis determined the expected annual benefit due to the pay-back and the electricity production cost (PCEE), incorporating the effects of the environmental impacts. When developing the present study, the system without/with SFB evidenced a global efficiency of 50.81 % vs 47.39 %, respectively. In addition, the system without SFB showed better results of exergetic efficiency and irreversibility, its Πg and ε were 0.056 kg/MJ and 93.2 %. While its total emissions were 16 % lower. The economic analysis verified the annual benefit due to the pay-back for an annual interest rate of 4 %, 8 % and 12 %, and the PCEE showed an increase between 10 % and 12 % in the case with SFB. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-29T13:34:46Z 2023-07-29T13:34:46Z 2023-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623 Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, v. 38. 2451-9049 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248112 10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623 2-s2.0-85145254629 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248112 |
identifier_str_mv |
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, v. 38. 2451-9049 10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101623 2-s2.0-85145254629 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826304116140277760 |