Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rossato, Amanda [UNESP], Miguel, Manuela Maria Viana [UNESP], Fonseca, Manuela Bafini [UNESP], Bautista, Cristhian Reynaldo Gomez [UNESP], de Marco, Andrea Carvalho [UNESP], Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes [UNESP], Ferreira Ferraz, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0212
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233808
Resumo: Background: Xenogeneic matrices (XMs) have been increasingly used for root coverage procedures. This study compared the use of two types of XM (collagen matrix [CM] and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix [XDM]) associated with the coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) to treat single gingival recessions. Methods: Seventy-five patients presenting single RT1 gingival recession were treated by CAF (control group, n = 25), CAF+CM (test group 1, n = 25), or CAF+XDM (test group 2, n = 25) and completed 6-month follow-up. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic assessments were performed and intra- and intergroup differences were analyzed. Results: At 6 months, the mean recession reduction for CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM was 2.4 ± 0.8 mm, 2.4 ± 0.9 mm and 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding mean percentage of root coverage was 78.9% ± 26.2% for CAF, 78.0% ± 28.5% for CAF+CM, and 65.6% ± 26.9% for CAF+XDM (P > 0.05). Dentin hypersensitivity and esthetic conditions showed significantly improvements in all groups. Test groups presented significant gains in gingival thickness (GT; CAF+CM: 0.4 ± 0.3 mm; CAF+XDM: 0.4 ± 0.2 mm) compared to the control group (CAF: 0.0 ± 0.1 mm; P < 0.05). Conclusion: The CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM treatments each provided similar results in the treatment of single gingival recessions. The addition of either CM or XDM to CAF increases the GT.
id UNSP_cdd9f620699b396dd35043e2d9029a74
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233808
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trialconnective tissue graft(s)cosmetic periodontal plastic surgerygingival recessionBackground: Xenogeneic matrices (XMs) have been increasingly used for root coverage procedures. This study compared the use of two types of XM (collagen matrix [CM] and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix [XDM]) associated with the coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) to treat single gingival recessions. Methods: Seventy-five patients presenting single RT1 gingival recession were treated by CAF (control group, n = 25), CAF+CM (test group 1, n = 25), or CAF+XDM (test group 2, n = 25) and completed 6-month follow-up. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic assessments were performed and intra- and intergroup differences were analyzed. Results: At 6 months, the mean recession reduction for CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM was 2.4 ± 0.8 mm, 2.4 ± 0.9 mm and 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding mean percentage of root coverage was 78.9% ± 26.2% for CAF, 78.0% ± 28.5% for CAF+CM, and 65.6% ± 26.9% for CAF+XDM (P > 0.05). Dentin hypersensitivity and esthetic conditions showed significantly improvements in all groups. Test groups presented significant gains in gingival thickness (GT; CAF+CM: 0.4 ± 0.3 mm; CAF+XDM: 0.4 ± 0.2 mm) compared to the control group (CAF: 0.0 ± 0.1 mm; P < 0.05). Conclusion: The CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM treatments each provided similar results in the treatment of single gingival recessions. The addition of either CM or XDM to CAF increases the GT.Division of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São José dos Campos São Paulo State University (Unesp)College of Dentistry–Lexington University of KentuckyDivision of Operative Dentistry Department of General Dentistry University of Maryland School of DentistryDivision of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São José dos Campos São Paulo State University (Unesp)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of KentuckyUniversity of Maryland School of DentistrySantamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]Rossato, Amanda [UNESP]Miguel, Manuela Maria Viana [UNESP]Fonseca, Manuela Bafini [UNESP]Bautista, Cristhian Reynaldo Gomez [UNESP]de Marco, Andrea Carvalho [UNESP]Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes [UNESP]Ferreira Ferraz, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]2022-05-01T10:19:02Z2022-05-01T10:19:02Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0212Journal of Periodontology.0022-3492http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23380810.1002/JPER.21-02122-s2.0-85119333374Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Periodontologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T10:19:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233808Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:23:55.936353Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial
title Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
connective tissue graft(s)
cosmetic periodontal plastic surgery
gingival recession
title_short Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial
author Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
author_facet Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
Rossato, Amanda [UNESP]
Miguel, Manuela Maria Viana [UNESP]
Fonseca, Manuela Bafini [UNESP]
Bautista, Cristhian Reynaldo Gomez [UNESP]
de Marco, Andrea Carvalho [UNESP]
Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes [UNESP]
Ferreira Ferraz, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Rossato, Amanda [UNESP]
Miguel, Manuela Maria Viana [UNESP]
Fonseca, Manuela Bafini [UNESP]
Bautista, Cristhian Reynaldo Gomez [UNESP]
de Marco, Andrea Carvalho [UNESP]
Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes [UNESP]
Ferreira Ferraz, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Kentucky
University of Maryland School of Dentistry
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
Rossato, Amanda [UNESP]
Miguel, Manuela Maria Viana [UNESP]
Fonseca, Manuela Bafini [UNESP]
Bautista, Cristhian Reynaldo Gomez [UNESP]
de Marco, Andrea Carvalho [UNESP]
Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes [UNESP]
Ferreira Ferraz, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv connective tissue graft(s)
cosmetic periodontal plastic surgery
gingival recession
topic connective tissue graft(s)
cosmetic periodontal plastic surgery
gingival recession
description Background: Xenogeneic matrices (XMs) have been increasingly used for root coverage procedures. This study compared the use of two types of XM (collagen matrix [CM] and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix [XDM]) associated with the coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) to treat single gingival recessions. Methods: Seventy-five patients presenting single RT1 gingival recession were treated by CAF (control group, n = 25), CAF+CM (test group 1, n = 25), or CAF+XDM (test group 2, n = 25) and completed 6-month follow-up. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic assessments were performed and intra- and intergroup differences were analyzed. Results: At 6 months, the mean recession reduction for CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM was 2.4 ± 0.8 mm, 2.4 ± 0.9 mm and 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding mean percentage of root coverage was 78.9% ± 26.2% for CAF, 78.0% ± 28.5% for CAF+CM, and 65.6% ± 26.9% for CAF+XDM (P > 0.05). Dentin hypersensitivity and esthetic conditions showed significantly improvements in all groups. Test groups presented significant gains in gingival thickness (GT; CAF+CM: 0.4 ± 0.3 mm; CAF+XDM: 0.4 ± 0.2 mm) compared to the control group (CAF: 0.0 ± 0.1 mm; P < 0.05). Conclusion: The CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM treatments each provided similar results in the treatment of single gingival recessions. The addition of either CM or XDM to CAF increases the GT.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-05-01T10:19:02Z
2022-05-01T10:19:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0212
Journal of Periodontology.
0022-3492
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233808
10.1002/JPER.21-0212
2-s2.0-85119333374
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0212
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233808
identifier_str_mv Journal of Periodontology.
0022-3492
10.1002/JPER.21-0212
2-s2.0-85119333374
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Periodontology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128804159225856