Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0575 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0575 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230646 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of different peracetic acid (PAA) formulations on smear layer (SL) removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity, and antibiofilm activity. METHODOLOGY: SL removal and dentine erosion were assessed using 90 premolars, distributed into six groups, according to final irrigation: PAA formulations (1% Sigma, 1% Bacterend OX, 1% Arposept, and 0.09-0.15% Anioxyde), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and water (control). Cytotoxicity was assessed by methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium (MTT) and neutral red assays. Antibacterial and antibiofilm effectiveness was evaluated against Enterococcus faecalis. For cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity assessment, the 2.5% NaOCl was also included. RESULTS: EDTA, Sigma, and Bacterend OX removed more SL than Arposept, Anioxyde, and water (p<0.05). EDTA caused more severe dentine erosion than Sigma and Bacterend OX (p<0.05). Sigma and Bacterend OX had higher cytotoxicity than the other solutions (p<0.05). NaOCl, Bacterend OX, Sigma, and Anioxyde significantly reduced E. faecalis colony-forming units (CFU) (p<0.05). The 2.5% NaOCl solution promoted greater biofilm biomass reduction (p<0.05) than the other solutions. All PAA formulations promoted greater biomass reduction than 17% EDTA (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although Sigma and Bacterend OX had higher cytotoxicity, they had a SL removal capability similar to that of EDTA, were as effective as NaOCl against E. faecalis biofilm, and promoted less dentine erosion than EDTA. Arposept and Anioxyde failed to remove the SL, had lower cytotoxicity, and showed less bacterial activity than NaOCl. |
id |
UNSP_d17caa3858949cb76b62e09c4e98650b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/230646 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activityOBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of different peracetic acid (PAA) formulations on smear layer (SL) removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity, and antibiofilm activity. METHODOLOGY: SL removal and dentine erosion were assessed using 90 premolars, distributed into six groups, according to final irrigation: PAA formulations (1% Sigma, 1% Bacterend OX, 1% Arposept, and 0.09-0.15% Anioxyde), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and water (control). Cytotoxicity was assessed by methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium (MTT) and neutral red assays. Antibacterial and antibiofilm effectiveness was evaluated against Enterococcus faecalis. For cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity assessment, the 2.5% NaOCl was also included. RESULTS: EDTA, Sigma, and Bacterend OX removed more SL than Arposept, Anioxyde, and water (p<0.05). EDTA caused more severe dentine erosion than Sigma and Bacterend OX (p<0.05). Sigma and Bacterend OX had higher cytotoxicity than the other solutions (p<0.05). NaOCl, Bacterend OX, Sigma, and Anioxyde significantly reduced E. faecalis colony-forming units (CFU) (p<0.05). The 2.5% NaOCl solution promoted greater biofilm biomass reduction (p<0.05) than the other solutions. All PAA formulations promoted greater biomass reduction than 17% EDTA (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although Sigma and Bacterend OX had higher cytotoxicity, they had a SL removal capability similar to that of EDTA, were as effective as NaOCl against E. faecalis biofilm, and promoted less dentine erosion than EDTA. Arposept and Anioxyde failed to remove the SL, had lower cytotoxicity, and showed less bacterial activity than NaOCl.Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Odontologia RestauradoraUniversidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Odontologia RestauradoraUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Viola, Kennia Scapin [UNESP]Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán [UNESP]Rodrigues, Elisandra Marcia [UNESP]Santos, Cíntia Silva [UNESP]Chávez-Andrade, Gisselle Moraima [UNESP]Magro, Miriam Graziele [UNESP]Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP]Faria, Gisele [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:41:21Z2022-04-29T08:41:21Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlee20210575http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0575Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, v. 30, p. e20210575-.1678-7765http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23064610.1590/1678-7757-2021-05752-s2.0-85127223455Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of applied oral science : revista FOBinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T18:03:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/230646Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T18:03:51Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity |
title |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity |
spellingShingle |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity Viola, Kennia Scapin [UNESP] Viola, Kennia Scapin [UNESP] |
title_short |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity |
title_full |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity |
title_fullStr |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity |
title_sort |
Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity |
author |
Viola, Kennia Scapin [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Viola, Kennia Scapin [UNESP] Viola, Kennia Scapin [UNESP] Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán [UNESP] Rodrigues, Elisandra Marcia [UNESP] Santos, Cíntia Silva [UNESP] Chávez-Andrade, Gisselle Moraima [UNESP] Magro, Miriam Graziele [UNESP] Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP] Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP] Faria, Gisele [UNESP] Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán [UNESP] Rodrigues, Elisandra Marcia [UNESP] Santos, Cíntia Silva [UNESP] Chávez-Andrade, Gisselle Moraima [UNESP] Magro, Miriam Graziele [UNESP] Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP] Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP] Faria, Gisele [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán [UNESP] Rodrigues, Elisandra Marcia [UNESP] Santos, Cíntia Silva [UNESP] Chávez-Andrade, Gisselle Moraima [UNESP] Magro, Miriam Graziele [UNESP] Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP] Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP] Faria, Gisele [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Viola, Kennia Scapin [UNESP] Coaguila-Llerena, Hernán [UNESP] Rodrigues, Elisandra Marcia [UNESP] Santos, Cíntia Silva [UNESP] Chávez-Andrade, Gisselle Moraima [UNESP] Magro, Miriam Graziele [UNESP] Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP] Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP] Faria, Gisele [UNESP] |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of different peracetic acid (PAA) formulations on smear layer (SL) removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity, and antibiofilm activity. METHODOLOGY: SL removal and dentine erosion were assessed using 90 premolars, distributed into six groups, according to final irrigation: PAA formulations (1% Sigma, 1% Bacterend OX, 1% Arposept, and 0.09-0.15% Anioxyde), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and water (control). Cytotoxicity was assessed by methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium (MTT) and neutral red assays. Antibacterial and antibiofilm effectiveness was evaluated against Enterococcus faecalis. For cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity assessment, the 2.5% NaOCl was also included. RESULTS: EDTA, Sigma, and Bacterend OX removed more SL than Arposept, Anioxyde, and water (p<0.05). EDTA caused more severe dentine erosion than Sigma and Bacterend OX (p<0.05). Sigma and Bacterend OX had higher cytotoxicity than the other solutions (p<0.05). NaOCl, Bacterend OX, Sigma, and Anioxyde significantly reduced E. faecalis colony-forming units (CFU) (p<0.05). The 2.5% NaOCl solution promoted greater biofilm biomass reduction (p<0.05) than the other solutions. All PAA formulations promoted greater biomass reduction than 17% EDTA (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although Sigma and Bacterend OX had higher cytotoxicity, they had a SL removal capability similar to that of EDTA, were as effective as NaOCl against E. faecalis biofilm, and promoted less dentine erosion than EDTA. Arposept and Anioxyde failed to remove the SL, had lower cytotoxicity, and showed less bacterial activity than NaOCl. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-29T08:41:21Z 2022-04-29T08:41:21Z 2022-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0575 Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, v. 30, p. e20210575-. 1678-7765 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230646 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0575 2-s2.0-85127223455 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0575 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230646 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, v. 30, p. e20210575-. 1678-7765 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0575 2-s2.0-85127223455 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
e20210575 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1822179109794480128 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0575 |