No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: An, Yang
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Bai, Zhaohui, Xu, Xiangbo, Guo, Xiaozhong, Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP], Philips, Cyriac Abby, Li, Yingying, Wu, Yanyan, Qi, Xingshun
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4097170
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200757
Resumo: Background and Aims. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is one of the most life-threatening emergency conditions. Hemostatic drugs are often prescribed to control AUGIB in clinical practice but have not been recommended by major guidelines and consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of hemostatic drugs on AUGIB in cirrhosis. Methods. All cirrhotic patients with AUGIB who were admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to June 2014 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into hemostatic drugs and no hemostatic drug groups. A 1: 1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed by adjusting age, gender, etiology of liver disease, Child-Pugh score, MELD score, hematemesis, red blood cell transfusion, vasoactive drugs, antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, and endoscopic variceal therapy. Primary outcomes included 5-day rebleeding and in-hospital mortality. Results. Overall, 982 cirrhotic patients with AUGIB were included (870 in hemostatic drugs group and 112 in no hemostatic drug group). In overall analyses, hemostatic drugs group had a significantly higher 5-day rebleeding rate (18.10% versus 5.40%, P=0.001) than no hemostatic drug group; in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between them (7.10% versus 4.50%, P=0.293). In PSM analyses, 172 patients were included (86 patients in each group). Hemostatic drugs group still had a significantly higher 5-day rebleeding rate (15.10% versus 5.80%, P=0.046); in-hospital mortality remained not significantly different (7.00% versus 3.50%, P=0.304) between them. Statistical results remained in PSM analyses according to the type of hemostatic drugs. Conclusions. The use of hemostatic drugs did not improve the in-hospital outcomes of cirrhotic patients with AUGIB.
id UNSP_d25566c15a40ae358fd4a7bd55a757b2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200757
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in CirrhosisBackground and Aims. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is one of the most life-threatening emergency conditions. Hemostatic drugs are often prescribed to control AUGIB in clinical practice but have not been recommended by major guidelines and consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of hemostatic drugs on AUGIB in cirrhosis. Methods. All cirrhotic patients with AUGIB who were admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to June 2014 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into hemostatic drugs and no hemostatic drug groups. A 1: 1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed by adjusting age, gender, etiology of liver disease, Child-Pugh score, MELD score, hematemesis, red blood cell transfusion, vasoactive drugs, antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, and endoscopic variceal therapy. Primary outcomes included 5-day rebleeding and in-hospital mortality. Results. Overall, 982 cirrhotic patients with AUGIB were included (870 in hemostatic drugs group and 112 in no hemostatic drug group). In overall analyses, hemostatic drugs group had a significantly higher 5-day rebleeding rate (18.10% versus 5.40%, P=0.001) than no hemostatic drug group; in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between them (7.10% versus 4.50%, P=0.293). In PSM analyses, 172 patients were included (86 patients in each group). Hemostatic drugs group still had a significantly higher 5-day rebleeding rate (15.10% versus 5.80%, P=0.046); in-hospital mortality remained not significantly different (7.00% versus 3.50%, P=0.304) between them. Statistical results remained in PSM analyses according to the type of hemostatic drugs. Conclusions. The use of hemostatic drugs did not improve the in-hospital outcomes of cirrhotic patients with AUGIB.Department of Gastroenterology General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)Postgraduate College Shenyang Pharmaceutical UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine Botucatu Medical School UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n Distrito de Rubião JrLiver Unit and Monarch Liver Lab Cochin Gastroenterology Group Ernakulam Medical CenterDepartment of Gastroenterology First People's Hospital of HuainanPostgraduate College Jinzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine Botucatu Medical School UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n Distrito de Rubião JrGeneral Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)Shenyang Pharmaceutical UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ernakulam Medical CenterFirst People's Hospital of HuainanJinzhou Medical UniversityAn, YangBai, ZhaohuiXu, XiangboGuo, XiaozhongRomeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]Philips, Cyriac AbbyLi, YingyingWu, YanyanQi, Xingshun2020-12-12T02:15:12Z2020-12-12T02:15:12Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4097170BioMed Research International, v. 2020.2314-61412314-6133http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20075710.1155/2020/40971702-s2.0-85087949529Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBioMed Research Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T17:21:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200757Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-14T17:21:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
title No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
spellingShingle No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
An, Yang
title_short No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
title_full No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
title_fullStr No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
title_full_unstemmed No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
title_sort No Benefit of Hemostatic Drugs on Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
author An, Yang
author_facet An, Yang
Bai, Zhaohui
Xu, Xiangbo
Guo, Xiaozhong
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
Philips, Cyriac Abby
Li, Yingying
Wu, Yanyan
Qi, Xingshun
author_role author
author2 Bai, Zhaohui
Xu, Xiangbo
Guo, Xiaozhong
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
Philips, Cyriac Abby
Li, Yingying
Wu, Yanyan
Qi, Xingshun
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Ernakulam Medical Center
First People's Hospital of Huainan
Jinzhou Medical University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv An, Yang
Bai, Zhaohui
Xu, Xiangbo
Guo, Xiaozhong
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
Philips, Cyriac Abby
Li, Yingying
Wu, Yanyan
Qi, Xingshun
description Background and Aims. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is one of the most life-threatening emergency conditions. Hemostatic drugs are often prescribed to control AUGIB in clinical practice but have not been recommended by major guidelines and consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of hemostatic drugs on AUGIB in cirrhosis. Methods. All cirrhotic patients with AUGIB who were admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to June 2014 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into hemostatic drugs and no hemostatic drug groups. A 1: 1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed by adjusting age, gender, etiology of liver disease, Child-Pugh score, MELD score, hematemesis, red blood cell transfusion, vasoactive drugs, antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, and endoscopic variceal therapy. Primary outcomes included 5-day rebleeding and in-hospital mortality. Results. Overall, 982 cirrhotic patients with AUGIB were included (870 in hemostatic drugs group and 112 in no hemostatic drug group). In overall analyses, hemostatic drugs group had a significantly higher 5-day rebleeding rate (18.10% versus 5.40%, P=0.001) than no hemostatic drug group; in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between them (7.10% versus 4.50%, P=0.293). In PSM analyses, 172 patients were included (86 patients in each group). Hemostatic drugs group still had a significantly higher 5-day rebleeding rate (15.10% versus 5.80%, P=0.046); in-hospital mortality remained not significantly different (7.00% versus 3.50%, P=0.304) between them. Statistical results remained in PSM analyses according to the type of hemostatic drugs. Conclusions. The use of hemostatic drugs did not improve the in-hospital outcomes of cirrhotic patients with AUGIB.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:15:12Z
2020-12-12T02:15:12Z
2020-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4097170
BioMed Research International, v. 2020.
2314-6141
2314-6133
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200757
10.1155/2020/4097170
2-s2.0-85087949529
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4097170
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200757
identifier_str_mv BioMed Research International, v. 2020.
2314-6141
2314-6133
10.1155/2020/4097170
2-s2.0-85087949529
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Research International
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128103521714176