Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wu, Adhan Amenomori [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: de BARROS, Jaqueline Ribeiro [UNESP], Ramdeen, Madhoor, Baima, Julio Pinheiro [UNESP], Saad-Hossne, Rogerio [UNESP], Sassaki, Ligia Yukie [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-86
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207004
Resumo: Background – Biological therapy and new drugs have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Ideally, the choice of medication should be a shared decision with the patient, aiming at greater satisfaction, compliance, and consequently, favorable clinical outcome. Objective – This study aims to evaluate patient’s preferences in the choice of their therapy and the factors that influence this choice. Methods – This cross-sectional study enrolled 101 outpatients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and no previous exposure to biological therapy. Patients’ preferences were assessed through questions that addressed the preferred mode of administration (oral, subcutaneous, or intravenous) and the factors that determined the choice of medication (efficacy, medical indication, fear of medication, convenience, mode of application, and personal doctors’ indication). Results – The mean age was 43.6±13.5 years, 75.3% were female, and 81.2% were cases of ulcerative colitis. Regarding the mode of administration, the majority of patients preferred oral (87.1%), followed by intravenous (6.93%) and subcutaneous (5.94%) medications. The reasons were “I prefer to take it at home” (42.57%), “I have more freedom” (36.63%), “I don’t like self-application” (29.70%), and “I believe it works better” (19.80%). Younger patients and patients in clinical disease activity preferred intravenous mode compared to the oral route (P<0.05). Doctor’s opinion (98%) was an important factor associated with the medication choice. Conclusion – Oral route was the preferred mode of administration and most patients took their physician’s opinion into account in their choice of medication.
id UNSP_d268770e018630d7c384ae85c7b6122a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207004
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in BrazilFatores associados com a escolha da terapia nos pacientes com doença inflamatória intestinal no BrasilBiological therapyCrohn diseaseDrug administration routesInflammatory bowel diseasesUlcerative colitisBackground – Biological therapy and new drugs have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Ideally, the choice of medication should be a shared decision with the patient, aiming at greater satisfaction, compliance, and consequently, favorable clinical outcome. Objective – This study aims to evaluate patient’s preferences in the choice of their therapy and the factors that influence this choice. Methods – This cross-sectional study enrolled 101 outpatients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and no previous exposure to biological therapy. Patients’ preferences were assessed through questions that addressed the preferred mode of administration (oral, subcutaneous, or intravenous) and the factors that determined the choice of medication (efficacy, medical indication, fear of medication, convenience, mode of application, and personal doctors’ indication). Results – The mean age was 43.6±13.5 years, 75.3% were female, and 81.2% were cases of ulcerative colitis. Regarding the mode of administration, the majority of patients preferred oral (87.1%), followed by intravenous (6.93%) and subcutaneous (5.94%) medications. The reasons were “I prefer to take it at home” (42.57%), “I have more freedom” (36.63%), “I don’t like self-application” (29.70%), and “I believe it works better” (19.80%). Younger patients and patients in clinical disease activity preferred intravenous mode compared to the oral route (P<0.05). Doctor’s opinion (98%) was an important factor associated with the medication choice. Conclusion – Oral route was the preferred mode of administration and most patients took their physician’s opinion into account in their choice of medication.Universidade Estadual PaulistaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Medicina Departamento de Clínica MédicaIBD Unit St Mark’s HospitalUnesp Faculdade de Medicina Departamento de CirurgiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Medicina Departamento de Clínica MédicaUnesp Faculdade de Medicina Departamento de CirurgiaCNPq: ID42174Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)St Mark’s HospitalWu, Adhan Amenomori [UNESP]de BARROS, Jaqueline Ribeiro [UNESP]Ramdeen, MadhoorBaima, Julio Pinheiro [UNESP]Saad-Hossne, Rogerio [UNESP]Sassaki, Ligia Yukie [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:47:25Z2021-06-25T10:47:25Z2020-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article491-497application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-86Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, v. 57, n. 4, p. 491-497, 2020.1678-42190004-2803http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20700410.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-86S0004-280320200004004912-s2.0-85097902532S0004-28032020000400491.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengArquivos de Gastroenterologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T17:23:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207004Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-14T17:23:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil
Fatores associados com a escolha da terapia nos pacientes com doença inflamatória intestinal no Brasil
title Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil
spellingShingle Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil
Wu, Adhan Amenomori [UNESP]
Biological therapy
Crohn disease
Drug administration routes
Inflammatory bowel diseases
Ulcerative colitis
title_short Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil
title_full Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil
title_fullStr Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil
title_sort Factors associated with patient´s preference in choosing their therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil
author Wu, Adhan Amenomori [UNESP]
author_facet Wu, Adhan Amenomori [UNESP]
de BARROS, Jaqueline Ribeiro [UNESP]
Ramdeen, Madhoor
Baima, Julio Pinheiro [UNESP]
Saad-Hossne, Rogerio [UNESP]
Sassaki, Ligia Yukie [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 de BARROS, Jaqueline Ribeiro [UNESP]
Ramdeen, Madhoor
Baima, Julio Pinheiro [UNESP]
Saad-Hossne, Rogerio [UNESP]
Sassaki, Ligia Yukie [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
St Mark’s Hospital
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wu, Adhan Amenomori [UNESP]
de BARROS, Jaqueline Ribeiro [UNESP]
Ramdeen, Madhoor
Baima, Julio Pinheiro [UNESP]
Saad-Hossne, Rogerio [UNESP]
Sassaki, Ligia Yukie [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biological therapy
Crohn disease
Drug administration routes
Inflammatory bowel diseases
Ulcerative colitis
topic Biological therapy
Crohn disease
Drug administration routes
Inflammatory bowel diseases
Ulcerative colitis
description Background – Biological therapy and new drugs have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Ideally, the choice of medication should be a shared decision with the patient, aiming at greater satisfaction, compliance, and consequently, favorable clinical outcome. Objective – This study aims to evaluate patient’s preferences in the choice of their therapy and the factors that influence this choice. Methods – This cross-sectional study enrolled 101 outpatients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and no previous exposure to biological therapy. Patients’ preferences were assessed through questions that addressed the preferred mode of administration (oral, subcutaneous, or intravenous) and the factors that determined the choice of medication (efficacy, medical indication, fear of medication, convenience, mode of application, and personal doctors’ indication). Results – The mean age was 43.6±13.5 years, 75.3% were female, and 81.2% were cases of ulcerative colitis. Regarding the mode of administration, the majority of patients preferred oral (87.1%), followed by intravenous (6.93%) and subcutaneous (5.94%) medications. The reasons were “I prefer to take it at home” (42.57%), “I have more freedom” (36.63%), “I don’t like self-application” (29.70%), and “I believe it works better” (19.80%). Younger patients and patients in clinical disease activity preferred intravenous mode compared to the oral route (P<0.05). Doctor’s opinion (98%) was an important factor associated with the medication choice. Conclusion – Oral route was the preferred mode of administration and most patients took their physician’s opinion into account in their choice of medication.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-01
2021-06-25T10:47:25Z
2021-06-25T10:47:25Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-86
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, v. 57, n. 4, p. 491-497, 2020.
1678-4219
0004-2803
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207004
10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-86
S0004-28032020000400491
2-s2.0-85097902532
S0004-28032020000400491.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-86
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207004
identifier_str_mv Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, v. 57, n. 4, p. 491-497, 2020.
1678-4219
0004-2803
10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-86
S0004-28032020000400491
2-s2.0-85097902532
S0004-28032020000400491.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 491-497
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128168880504832