Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Braz, Leandro G., Freire, Cristiana M M, Lucio, Lorena M C, Braz, José R. C., Tang, Guangwen, Salvadori, Daisy M. F., Yeum, Kyung-Jin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001266
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131074
Resumo: Isoflurane is a volatile halogenated anesthetic used especially for anesthesia maintenance whereas propofol is a venous anesthetic utilized for anesthesia induction and maintenance, and reportedly an antioxidant. However, there are still controversies related to isoflurane-induced oxidative stress and it remains unanswered whether the antioxidant effects occur in patients under propofol anesthesia.Taking into account the importance of better understanding the role of anesthetics on oxidative stress in anesthetized patients, the present study was designed to evaluate general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane or propofol on antioxidant status in patients who underwent minimally invasive surgeries.We conducted a prospective randomized trial in 30 adult patients without comorbidities who underwent elective minor surgery (septoplasty) lasting at least 2 h admitted to a Brazilian tertiary hospital.The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, according to anesthesia maintenance (isoflurane, n = 15 or propofol, n = 15). Peripheral blood samples were drawn before anesthesia (baseline) and 2-h after anesthesia induction.The primary outcomes were to investigate the effect of either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia on aqueous plasma oxidizability and total antioxidant performance (TAP) by fluorometry as well as several individual antioxidants by high-performance liquid chromatography. As secondary outcome, oxidized genetic damage (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, known as 8-oxo-Gua) was investigated by the comet assay.Both anesthesia techniques (isoflurane or propofol) for a 2-h period resulted in a significant decrease of plasma α-tocopherol, but not other antioxidants including uric acid, carotenoids, and retinol (P > 0.05). Propofol, in contrast to isoflurane anesthesia, significantly increased (P < 0.001) anti-inflammatory/antioxidant plasma γ-tocopherol concentration in patients. Both anesthesia types significantly enhanced hydrophilic antioxidant capacity and TAP, with no significant difference between them, and 8-oxo-Gua remained unchanged during anesthesia in both groups. In addition, both anesthetics showed antioxidant capacity in vitro.This study shows that anesthesia maintained with either propofol or isoflurane increase both hydrophilic and total antioxidant capacity in plasma, but only propofol anesthesia increases plasma γ-tocopherol concentration. Additionally, both types of anesthetics do not lead to oxidative DNA damage in patients without comorbidities undergoing minimally invasive surgery.
id UNSP_d2ab1b6b0fa5dea6508fad582d0ec303
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131074
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical studyIsoflurane is a volatile halogenated anesthetic used especially for anesthesia maintenance whereas propofol is a venous anesthetic utilized for anesthesia induction and maintenance, and reportedly an antioxidant. However, there are still controversies related to isoflurane-induced oxidative stress and it remains unanswered whether the antioxidant effects occur in patients under propofol anesthesia.Taking into account the importance of better understanding the role of anesthetics on oxidative stress in anesthetized patients, the present study was designed to evaluate general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane or propofol on antioxidant status in patients who underwent minimally invasive surgeries.We conducted a prospective randomized trial in 30 adult patients without comorbidities who underwent elective minor surgery (septoplasty) lasting at least 2 h admitted to a Brazilian tertiary hospital.The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, according to anesthesia maintenance (isoflurane, n = 15 or propofol, n = 15). Peripheral blood samples were drawn before anesthesia (baseline) and 2-h after anesthesia induction.The primary outcomes were to investigate the effect of either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia on aqueous plasma oxidizability and total antioxidant performance (TAP) by fluorometry as well as several individual antioxidants by high-performance liquid chromatography. As secondary outcome, oxidized genetic damage (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, known as 8-oxo-Gua) was investigated by the comet assay.Both anesthesia techniques (isoflurane or propofol) for a 2-h period resulted in a significant decrease of plasma α-tocopherol, but not other antioxidants including uric acid, carotenoids, and retinol (P > 0.05). Propofol, in contrast to isoflurane anesthesia, significantly increased (P < 0.001) anti-inflammatory/antioxidant plasma γ-tocopherol concentration in patients. Both anesthesia types significantly enhanced hydrophilic antioxidant capacity and TAP, with no significant difference between them, and 8-oxo-Gua remained unchanged during anesthesia in both groups. In addition, both anesthetics showed antioxidant capacity in vitro.This study shows that anesthesia maintained with either propofol or isoflurane increase both hydrophilic and total antioxidant capacity in plasma, but only propofol anesthesia increases plasma γ-tocopherol concentration. Additionally, both types of anesthetics do not lead to oxidative DNA damage in patients without comorbidities undergoing minimally invasive surgery.Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil (MGB, LGB, CMMF, LMCL, JRCB, DMFS); Jean Mayer USDA-Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA (MGB, GT, K-JY); and College of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Konkuk University, Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea (K-JY).Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, UNESP—Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil (MGB, LGB, CMMF, LMCL, JRCB, DMFS)Department of Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP—Univ Estadual Paulista, District of Rubiao Junior, Botucatu, Sao Paulo 18618-970, BrazilMedicineUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Tufts UniversityKonkuk UniversityBraz, Mariana G. [UNESP]Braz, Leandro G.Freire, Cristiana M MLucio, Lorena M CBraz, José R. C.Tang, GuangwenSalvadori, Daisy M. F.Yeum, Kyung-Jin2015-12-07T15:31:22Z2015-12-07T15:31:22Z2015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-9application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001266Medicine, v. 94, n. 31, p. 1-9, 2015.1536-5964http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13107410.1097/MD.0000000000001266PMC4616612.pdf26252290PMC46166120000-0003-4413-226XPubMedreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMedicineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T13:20:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131074Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-14T13:20:51Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
title Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
spellingShingle Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP]
title_short Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
title_full Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
title_fullStr Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
title_sort Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
author Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP]
author_facet Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP]
Braz, Leandro G.
Freire, Cristiana M M
Lucio, Lorena M C
Braz, José R. C.
Tang, Guangwen
Salvadori, Daisy M. F.
Yeum, Kyung-Jin
author_role author
author2 Braz, Leandro G.
Freire, Cristiana M M
Lucio, Lorena M C
Braz, José R. C.
Tang, Guangwen
Salvadori, Daisy M. F.
Yeum, Kyung-Jin
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Tufts University
Konkuk University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP]
Braz, Leandro G.
Freire, Cristiana M M
Lucio, Lorena M C
Braz, José R. C.
Tang, Guangwen
Salvadori, Daisy M. F.
Yeum, Kyung-Jin
description Isoflurane is a volatile halogenated anesthetic used especially for anesthesia maintenance whereas propofol is a venous anesthetic utilized for anesthesia induction and maintenance, and reportedly an antioxidant. However, there are still controversies related to isoflurane-induced oxidative stress and it remains unanswered whether the antioxidant effects occur in patients under propofol anesthesia.Taking into account the importance of better understanding the role of anesthetics on oxidative stress in anesthetized patients, the present study was designed to evaluate general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane or propofol on antioxidant status in patients who underwent minimally invasive surgeries.We conducted a prospective randomized trial in 30 adult patients without comorbidities who underwent elective minor surgery (septoplasty) lasting at least 2 h admitted to a Brazilian tertiary hospital.The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, according to anesthesia maintenance (isoflurane, n = 15 or propofol, n = 15). Peripheral blood samples were drawn before anesthesia (baseline) and 2-h after anesthesia induction.The primary outcomes were to investigate the effect of either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia on aqueous plasma oxidizability and total antioxidant performance (TAP) by fluorometry as well as several individual antioxidants by high-performance liquid chromatography. As secondary outcome, oxidized genetic damage (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, known as 8-oxo-Gua) was investigated by the comet assay.Both anesthesia techniques (isoflurane or propofol) for a 2-h period resulted in a significant decrease of plasma α-tocopherol, but not other antioxidants including uric acid, carotenoids, and retinol (P > 0.05). Propofol, in contrast to isoflurane anesthesia, significantly increased (P < 0.001) anti-inflammatory/antioxidant plasma γ-tocopherol concentration in patients. Both anesthesia types significantly enhanced hydrophilic antioxidant capacity and TAP, with no significant difference between them, and 8-oxo-Gua remained unchanged during anesthesia in both groups. In addition, both anesthetics showed antioxidant capacity in vitro.This study shows that anesthesia maintained with either propofol or isoflurane increase both hydrophilic and total antioxidant capacity in plasma, but only propofol anesthesia increases plasma γ-tocopherol concentration. Additionally, both types of anesthetics do not lead to oxidative DNA damage in patients without comorbidities undergoing minimally invasive surgery.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-07T15:31:22Z
2015-12-07T15:31:22Z
2015
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001266
Medicine, v. 94, n. 31, p. 1-9, 2015.
1536-5964
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131074
10.1097/MD.0000000000001266
PMC4616612.pdf
26252290
PMC4616612
0000-0003-4413-226X
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001266
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131074
identifier_str_mv Medicine, v. 94, n. 31, p. 1-9, 2015.
1536-5964
10.1097/MD.0000000000001266
PMC4616612.pdf
26252290
PMC4616612
0000-0003-4413-226X
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Medicine
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1-9
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Medicine
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Medicine
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PubMed
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128195265822720