Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001266 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131074 |
Resumo: | Isoflurane is a volatile halogenated anesthetic used especially for anesthesia maintenance whereas propofol is a venous anesthetic utilized for anesthesia induction and maintenance, and reportedly an antioxidant. However, there are still controversies related to isoflurane-induced oxidative stress and it remains unanswered whether the antioxidant effects occur in patients under propofol anesthesia.Taking into account the importance of better understanding the role of anesthetics on oxidative stress in anesthetized patients, the present study was designed to evaluate general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane or propofol on antioxidant status in patients who underwent minimally invasive surgeries.We conducted a prospective randomized trial in 30 adult patients without comorbidities who underwent elective minor surgery (septoplasty) lasting at least 2 h admitted to a Brazilian tertiary hospital.The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, according to anesthesia maintenance (isoflurane, n = 15 or propofol, n = 15). Peripheral blood samples were drawn before anesthesia (baseline) and 2-h after anesthesia induction.The primary outcomes were to investigate the effect of either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia on aqueous plasma oxidizability and total antioxidant performance (TAP) by fluorometry as well as several individual antioxidants by high-performance liquid chromatography. As secondary outcome, oxidized genetic damage (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, known as 8-oxo-Gua) was investigated by the comet assay.Both anesthesia techniques (isoflurane or propofol) for a 2-h period resulted in a significant decrease of plasma α-tocopherol, but not other antioxidants including uric acid, carotenoids, and retinol (P > 0.05). Propofol, in contrast to isoflurane anesthesia, significantly increased (P < 0.001) anti-inflammatory/antioxidant plasma γ-tocopherol concentration in patients. Both anesthesia types significantly enhanced hydrophilic antioxidant capacity and TAP, with no significant difference between them, and 8-oxo-Gua remained unchanged during anesthesia in both groups. In addition, both anesthetics showed antioxidant capacity in vitro.This study shows that anesthesia maintained with either propofol or isoflurane increase both hydrophilic and total antioxidant capacity in plasma, but only propofol anesthesia increases plasma γ-tocopherol concentration. Additionally, both types of anesthetics do not lead to oxidative DNA damage in patients without comorbidities undergoing minimally invasive surgery. |
id |
UNSP_d2ab1b6b0fa5dea6508fad582d0ec303 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131074 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical studyIsoflurane is a volatile halogenated anesthetic used especially for anesthesia maintenance whereas propofol is a venous anesthetic utilized for anesthesia induction and maintenance, and reportedly an antioxidant. However, there are still controversies related to isoflurane-induced oxidative stress and it remains unanswered whether the antioxidant effects occur in patients under propofol anesthesia.Taking into account the importance of better understanding the role of anesthetics on oxidative stress in anesthetized patients, the present study was designed to evaluate general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane or propofol on antioxidant status in patients who underwent minimally invasive surgeries.We conducted a prospective randomized trial in 30 adult patients without comorbidities who underwent elective minor surgery (septoplasty) lasting at least 2 h admitted to a Brazilian tertiary hospital.The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, according to anesthesia maintenance (isoflurane, n = 15 or propofol, n = 15). Peripheral blood samples were drawn before anesthesia (baseline) and 2-h after anesthesia induction.The primary outcomes were to investigate the effect of either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia on aqueous plasma oxidizability and total antioxidant performance (TAP) by fluorometry as well as several individual antioxidants by high-performance liquid chromatography. As secondary outcome, oxidized genetic damage (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, known as 8-oxo-Gua) was investigated by the comet assay.Both anesthesia techniques (isoflurane or propofol) for a 2-h period resulted in a significant decrease of plasma α-tocopherol, but not other antioxidants including uric acid, carotenoids, and retinol (P > 0.05). Propofol, in contrast to isoflurane anesthesia, significantly increased (P < 0.001) anti-inflammatory/antioxidant plasma γ-tocopherol concentration in patients. Both anesthesia types significantly enhanced hydrophilic antioxidant capacity and TAP, with no significant difference between them, and 8-oxo-Gua remained unchanged during anesthesia in both groups. In addition, both anesthetics showed antioxidant capacity in vitro.This study shows that anesthesia maintained with either propofol or isoflurane increase both hydrophilic and total antioxidant capacity in plasma, but only propofol anesthesia increases plasma γ-tocopherol concentration. Additionally, both types of anesthetics do not lead to oxidative DNA damage in patients without comorbidities undergoing minimally invasive surgery.Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil (MGB, LGB, CMMF, LMCL, JRCB, DMFS); Jean Mayer USDA-Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA (MGB, GT, K-JY); and College of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Konkuk University, Chungcheongbuk-do, South Korea (K-JY).Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, UNESP—Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil (MGB, LGB, CMMF, LMCL, JRCB, DMFS)Department of Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP—Univ Estadual Paulista, District of Rubiao Junior, Botucatu, Sao Paulo 18618-970, BrazilMedicineUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Tufts UniversityKonkuk UniversityBraz, Mariana G. [UNESP]Braz, Leandro G.Freire, Cristiana M MLucio, Lorena M CBraz, José R. C.Tang, GuangwenSalvadori, Daisy M. F.Yeum, Kyung-Jin2015-12-07T15:31:22Z2015-12-07T15:31:22Z2015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-9application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001266Medicine, v. 94, n. 31, p. 1-9, 2015.1536-5964http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13107410.1097/MD.0000000000001266PMC4616612.pdf26252290PMC46166120000-0003-4413-226XPubMedreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMedicineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T13:20:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131074Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-14T13:20:51Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study |
title |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study |
spellingShingle |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP] |
title_short |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study |
title_full |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study |
title_fullStr |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study |
title_sort |
Isoflurane and propofol contribute to increasing the antioxidant status of patients during minor elective surgery: a randomized clinical study |
author |
Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP] Braz, Leandro G. Freire, Cristiana M M Lucio, Lorena M C Braz, José R. C. Tang, Guangwen Salvadori, Daisy M. F. Yeum, Kyung-Jin |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Braz, Leandro G. Freire, Cristiana M M Lucio, Lorena M C Braz, José R. C. Tang, Guangwen Salvadori, Daisy M. F. Yeum, Kyung-Jin |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Tufts University Konkuk University |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP] Braz, Leandro G. Freire, Cristiana M M Lucio, Lorena M C Braz, José R. C. Tang, Guangwen Salvadori, Daisy M. F. Yeum, Kyung-Jin |
description |
Isoflurane is a volatile halogenated anesthetic used especially for anesthesia maintenance whereas propofol is a venous anesthetic utilized for anesthesia induction and maintenance, and reportedly an antioxidant. However, there are still controversies related to isoflurane-induced oxidative stress and it remains unanswered whether the antioxidant effects occur in patients under propofol anesthesia.Taking into account the importance of better understanding the role of anesthetics on oxidative stress in anesthetized patients, the present study was designed to evaluate general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane or propofol on antioxidant status in patients who underwent minimally invasive surgeries.We conducted a prospective randomized trial in 30 adult patients without comorbidities who underwent elective minor surgery (septoplasty) lasting at least 2 h admitted to a Brazilian tertiary hospital.The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, according to anesthesia maintenance (isoflurane, n = 15 or propofol, n = 15). Peripheral blood samples were drawn before anesthesia (baseline) and 2-h after anesthesia induction.The primary outcomes were to investigate the effect of either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia on aqueous plasma oxidizability and total antioxidant performance (TAP) by fluorometry as well as several individual antioxidants by high-performance liquid chromatography. As secondary outcome, oxidized genetic damage (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, known as 8-oxo-Gua) was investigated by the comet assay.Both anesthesia techniques (isoflurane or propofol) for a 2-h period resulted in a significant decrease of plasma α-tocopherol, but not other antioxidants including uric acid, carotenoids, and retinol (P > 0.05). Propofol, in contrast to isoflurane anesthesia, significantly increased (P < 0.001) anti-inflammatory/antioxidant plasma γ-tocopherol concentration in patients. Both anesthesia types significantly enhanced hydrophilic antioxidant capacity and TAP, with no significant difference between them, and 8-oxo-Gua remained unchanged during anesthesia in both groups. In addition, both anesthetics showed antioxidant capacity in vitro.This study shows that anesthesia maintained with either propofol or isoflurane increase both hydrophilic and total antioxidant capacity in plasma, but only propofol anesthesia increases plasma γ-tocopherol concentration. Additionally, both types of anesthetics do not lead to oxidative DNA damage in patients without comorbidities undergoing minimally invasive surgery. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-07T15:31:22Z 2015-12-07T15:31:22Z 2015 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001266 Medicine, v. 94, n. 31, p. 1-9, 2015. 1536-5964 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131074 10.1097/MD.0000000000001266 PMC4616612.pdf 26252290 PMC4616612 0000-0003-4413-226X |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001266 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131074 |
identifier_str_mv |
Medicine, v. 94, n. 31, p. 1-9, 2015. 1536-5964 10.1097/MD.0000000000001266 PMC4616612.pdf 26252290 PMC4616612 0000-0003-4413-226X |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicine |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1-9 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicine |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicine |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
PubMed reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128195265822720 |