Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Crusciol, Carlos A.C. [UNESP], Leite, Marcio F.A., Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP], Kuramae, Eiko E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107688
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222518
Resumo: Forage grasses used in cropping no-till systems in tropical regions alter soil chemical properties, but their long-term impact on soil microbial processes of the nitrogen (N) cycle and microbial community abundance, composition and structure are unknown. Here, microbial functions related to nitrogen fixation, nitrification and denitrification as well as bacterial, archaeal and fungal populations were evaluated in a long-term field experiment in which tropical forage grasses palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. Ex A. Rich.) R.D. Webster) and ruzigrass (U. ruziziensis (R. Germ. and C.M. Evrard) Crins) were cultivated with or without N fertilization. Uncultivated soil was used as a control. Forage grasses, especially palisade grass, increased soil bacterial and fungal abundances, whereas the archaeal population was highest in uncultivated soil. In soils cultivated with forage grasses, N fertilization favored N-cycle-related genes; however, cultivation of palisade grass increased the abundances of amoA bacteria (AOB) and amoA archaea (AOA) genes associated with soil nitrification and decreased the abundances of genes nirS, nirK and nosZ genes related to denitrification, compared to ruzigrass and control, regardless of N input. In addition, abundances of total bacteria and total fungi were associated with the N cycle and plant biomass in soils cultivated with forage grasses. Forage cultivation clearly benefitted the soil nutrient environment (S-SO42-, Mg2+, total-C and -N, N-NO3- and N-NH4+) and microbiome (bacteria and fungi) compared with uncultivated soil. In soil cultivated with palisade grass, the microbial community composition was unresponsive to N addition. The high N uptake by palisade grass supports the competitive advantage of this plant species over microorganisms for N sources. Our results suggest that palisade grass has advantages over ruzigrass for use in agriculture systems, regardless of N input.
id UNSP_d40c818f4c81f64fa6863eb294f90a54
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222518
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture SystemBacteriaBrachiaria spp.FungiN cycleNitrogen fertilizerNo tillage systemForage grasses used in cropping no-till systems in tropical regions alter soil chemical properties, but their long-term impact on soil microbial processes of the nitrogen (N) cycle and microbial community abundance, composition and structure are unknown. Here, microbial functions related to nitrogen fixation, nitrification and denitrification as well as bacterial, archaeal and fungal populations were evaluated in a long-term field experiment in which tropical forage grasses palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. Ex A. Rich.) R.D. Webster) and ruzigrass (U. ruziziensis (R. Germ. and C.M. Evrard) Crins) were cultivated with or without N fertilization. Uncultivated soil was used as a control. Forage grasses, especially palisade grass, increased soil bacterial and fungal abundances, whereas the archaeal population was highest in uncultivated soil. In soils cultivated with forage grasses, N fertilization favored N-cycle-related genes; however, cultivation of palisade grass increased the abundances of amoA bacteria (AOB) and amoA archaea (AOA) genes associated with soil nitrification and decreased the abundances of genes nirS, nirK and nosZ genes related to denitrification, compared to ruzigrass and control, regardless of N input. In addition, abundances of total bacteria and total fungi were associated with the N cycle and plant biomass in soils cultivated with forage grasses. Forage cultivation clearly benefitted the soil nutrient environment (S-SO42-, Mg2+, total-C and -N, N-NO3- and N-NH4+) and microbiome (bacteria and fungi) compared with uncultivated soil. In soil cultivated with palisade grass, the microbial community composition was unresponsive to N addition. The high N uptake by palisade grass supports the competitive advantage of this plant species over microorganisms for N sources. Our results suggest that palisade grass has advantages over ruzigrass for use in agriculture systems, regardless of N input.Department of Microbial Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)Institute of Environmental Biology Ecology and Biodiversity Utrecht University (UU)Department of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)Utrecht University (UU)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]Crusciol, Carlos A.C. [UNESP]Leite, Marcio F.A.Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]Kuramae, Eiko E.2022-04-28T19:45:13Z2022-04-28T19:45:13Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107688Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 323.0167-8809http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22251810.1016/j.agee.2021.1076882-s2.0-85115929529Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environmentinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:45:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222518Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:07:17.822250Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System
title Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System
spellingShingle Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System
Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]
Bacteria
Brachiaria spp.
Fungi
N cycle
Nitrogen fertilizer
No tillage system
title_short Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System
title_full Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System
title_fullStr Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System
title_full_unstemmed Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System
title_sort Forage Grasses Steer Soil Nitrogen Processes, Microbial Populations, and Microbiome Composition in A Long-term Tropical Agriculture System
author Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]
author_facet Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]
Crusciol, Carlos A.C. [UNESP]
Leite, Marcio F.A.
Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]
Kuramae, Eiko E.
author_role author
author2 Crusciol, Carlos A.C. [UNESP]
Leite, Marcio F.A.
Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]
Kuramae, Eiko E.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)
Utrecht University (UU)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Momesso, Letusa [UNESP]
Crusciol, Carlos A.C. [UNESP]
Leite, Marcio F.A.
Bossolani, Joao W. [UNESP]
Kuramae, Eiko E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bacteria
Brachiaria spp.
Fungi
N cycle
Nitrogen fertilizer
No tillage system
topic Bacteria
Brachiaria spp.
Fungi
N cycle
Nitrogen fertilizer
No tillage system
description Forage grasses used in cropping no-till systems in tropical regions alter soil chemical properties, but their long-term impact on soil microbial processes of the nitrogen (N) cycle and microbial community abundance, composition and structure are unknown. Here, microbial functions related to nitrogen fixation, nitrification and denitrification as well as bacterial, archaeal and fungal populations were evaluated in a long-term field experiment in which tropical forage grasses palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. Ex A. Rich.) R.D. Webster) and ruzigrass (U. ruziziensis (R. Germ. and C.M. Evrard) Crins) were cultivated with or without N fertilization. Uncultivated soil was used as a control. Forage grasses, especially palisade grass, increased soil bacterial and fungal abundances, whereas the archaeal population was highest in uncultivated soil. In soils cultivated with forage grasses, N fertilization favored N-cycle-related genes; however, cultivation of palisade grass increased the abundances of amoA bacteria (AOB) and amoA archaea (AOA) genes associated with soil nitrification and decreased the abundances of genes nirS, nirK and nosZ genes related to denitrification, compared to ruzigrass and control, regardless of N input. In addition, abundances of total bacteria and total fungi were associated with the N cycle and plant biomass in soils cultivated with forage grasses. Forage cultivation clearly benefitted the soil nutrient environment (S-SO42-, Mg2+, total-C and -N, N-NO3- and N-NH4+) and microbiome (bacteria and fungi) compared with uncultivated soil. In soil cultivated with palisade grass, the microbial community composition was unresponsive to N addition. The high N uptake by palisade grass supports the competitive advantage of this plant species over microorganisms for N sources. Our results suggest that palisade grass has advantages over ruzigrass for use in agriculture systems, regardless of N input.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28T19:45:13Z
2022-04-28T19:45:13Z
2022-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107688
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 323.
0167-8809
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222518
10.1016/j.agee.2021.107688
2-s2.0-85115929529
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107688
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222518
identifier_str_mv Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 323.
0167-8809
10.1016/j.agee.2021.107688
2-s2.0-85115929529
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128465000464384