Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2579346 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206737 |
Resumo: | There are many advantages of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in remote sensing but when using radiometrically corrected multispectral images. This study focuses on two techniques of obtain a multispectral orthomosaic with suitable radiometric quality considering a day period with minor variations in illumination and clouds. The first technique comprises a radiometric block adjustment combined with empirical line whilst the second technique uses only empirical line. Field measurements with spectrometers were used to assess the techniques. The obtained results show that the radiometric block adjustment presented better results when compared to the radiometric reference targets and its calculated Hemispherical Conical Reflectance Factor (HCRF) from the spectrometer. However, the root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were similar in both cases, showing that the two proposed workflows can generate multispectral mosaics with acceptable radiometric quality for a period in which illumination conditions are stable. Images difference between each band was produced showing that there was a stronger variation of pixels in the higher slope region, which indicates that additional corrections beyond empirical line are needed in these situations. |
id |
UNSP_d4100df9f309fca58d49d085b79191b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206737 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral imagesEmpirical lineImage processingMosaic generationMultispectral imagesRadiometric block adjustmentUnmanned aerial vehicles - UAVThere are many advantages of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in remote sensing but when using radiometrically corrected multispectral images. This study focuses on two techniques of obtain a multispectral orthomosaic with suitable radiometric quality considering a day period with minor variations in illumination and clouds. The first technique comprises a radiometric block adjustment combined with empirical line whilst the second technique uses only empirical line. Field measurements with spectrometers were used to assess the techniques. The obtained results show that the radiometric block adjustment presented better results when compared to the radiometric reference targets and its calculated Hemispherical Conical Reflectance Factor (HCRF) from the spectrometer. However, the root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were similar in both cases, showing that the two proposed workflows can generate multispectral mosaics with acceptable radiometric quality for a period in which illumination conditions are stable. Images difference between each band was produced showing that there was a stronger variation of pixels in the higher slope region, which indicates that additional corrections beyond empirical line are needed in these situations.Post Graduate Program in Cartographic Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)Dept. of Cartography São Paulo State University (UNESP)Finnish Geodetic Inst.Post Graduate Program in Cartographic Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)Dept. of Cartography São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Finnish Geodetic Inst.Porto, L. R. [UNESP]Imai, N. N. [UNESP]Berveglieri, A. [UNESP]Miyoshi, G. T. [UNESP]Moriya, E. A.S. [UNESP]Tommaselli, A. M.G. [UNESP]Honkavaara, E.2021-06-25T10:37:21Z2021-06-25T10:37:21Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2579346Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, v. 11533.1996-756X0277-786Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20673710.1117/12.25793462-s2.0-85093974489Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineeringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-18T15:02:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206737Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-06-18T15:02:41Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images |
title |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images Porto, L. R. [UNESP] Empirical line Image processing Mosaic generation Multispectral images Radiometric block adjustment Unmanned aerial vehicles - UAV |
title_short |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images |
title_full |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images |
title_sort |
Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images |
author |
Porto, L. R. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Porto, L. R. [UNESP] Imai, N. N. [UNESP] Berveglieri, A. [UNESP] Miyoshi, G. T. [UNESP] Moriya, E. A.S. [UNESP] Tommaselli, A. M.G. [UNESP] Honkavaara, E. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Imai, N. N. [UNESP] Berveglieri, A. [UNESP] Miyoshi, G. T. [UNESP] Moriya, E. A.S. [UNESP] Tommaselli, A. M.G. [UNESP] Honkavaara, E. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Finnish Geodetic Inst. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Porto, L. R. [UNESP] Imai, N. N. [UNESP] Berveglieri, A. [UNESP] Miyoshi, G. T. [UNESP] Moriya, E. A.S. [UNESP] Tommaselli, A. M.G. [UNESP] Honkavaara, E. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Empirical line Image processing Mosaic generation Multispectral images Radiometric block adjustment Unmanned aerial vehicles - UAV |
topic |
Empirical line Image processing Mosaic generation Multispectral images Radiometric block adjustment Unmanned aerial vehicles - UAV |
description |
There are many advantages of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in remote sensing but when using radiometrically corrected multispectral images. This study focuses on two techniques of obtain a multispectral orthomosaic with suitable radiometric quality considering a day period with minor variations in illumination and clouds. The first technique comprises a radiometric block adjustment combined with empirical line whilst the second technique uses only empirical line. Field measurements with spectrometers were used to assess the techniques. The obtained results show that the radiometric block adjustment presented better results when compared to the radiometric reference targets and its calculated Hemispherical Conical Reflectance Factor (HCRF) from the spectrometer. However, the root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were similar in both cases, showing that the two proposed workflows can generate multispectral mosaics with acceptable radiometric quality for a period in which illumination conditions are stable. Images difference between each band was produced showing that there was a stronger variation of pixels in the higher slope region, which indicates that additional corrections beyond empirical line are needed in these situations. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 2021-06-25T10:37:21Z 2021-06-25T10:37:21Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2579346 Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, v. 11533. 1996-756X 0277-786X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206737 10.1117/12.2579346 2-s2.0-85093974489 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2579346 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206737 |
identifier_str_mv |
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, v. 11533. 1996-756X 0277-786X 10.1117/12.2579346 2-s2.0-85093974489 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826304581068390400 |