Content selection in undergraduate LIS education

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zins, Chaim
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Santos, Placida L.V.A.C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.12783/issn.2328-2967/58/3/1
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220913
Resumo: The study presented in this article is aimed to improve the academic education in the field of library and information science by structuring the curricular and pedagogical reasoning that shapes the contents of undergraduate academic programs. It was composed of two methodological phases. The first phase was a systematic Critical Delphi study with 21 leading information science scholars from Brazil. The second phase was an unsystematic formative evaluation of the content categories. The evaluation was based on a Grounded Theory study of more than 100 programs worldwide. The study resulted in a universal model that sets the guiding principles for developing bachelor's degree programs applicable worldwide. The model, which is actually composed of two complementary models, is a systematic four step developing process (model1.1) and a structured plan of 288 content categories (model1.2). It is grounded on theoretical foundations and empirical studies.
id UNSP_d6ab1ef49be56dc82b1d1b87147c258d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220913
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Content selection in undergraduate LIS educationBachelor DegreesContent AnalysisDelphi StudiesGrounded TheoryInformation ProfessionsLIS EducationUndergraduate EducationThe study presented in this article is aimed to improve the academic education in the field of library and information science by structuring the curricular and pedagogical reasoning that shapes the contents of undergraduate academic programs. It was composed of two methodological phases. The first phase was a systematic Critical Delphi study with 21 leading information science scholars from Brazil. The second phase was an unsystematic formative evaluation of the content categories. The evaluation was based on a Grounded Theory study of more than 100 programs worldwide. The study resulted in a universal model that sets the guiding principles for developing bachelor's degree programs applicable worldwide. The model, which is actually composed of two complementary models, is a systematic four step developing process (model1.1) and a structured plan of 288 content categories (model1.2). It is grounded on theoretical foundations and empirical studies.Knowledge Mapping ResearchDepartment of Information Science Saõ Paulo State UniversityKnowledge Mapping ResearchSaõ Paulo State UniversityZins, ChaimSantos, Placida L.V.A.C.2022-04-28T19:06:55Z2022-04-28T19:06:55Z2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article120-140http://dx.doi.org/10.12783/issn.2328-2967/58/3/1Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, v. 58, n. 3, p. 120-140, 2017.2328-29670748-5786http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22091310.12783/issn.2328-2967/58/3/12-s2.0-85029070627Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Education for Library and Information Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:06:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220913Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:06:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Content selection in undergraduate LIS education
title Content selection in undergraduate LIS education
spellingShingle Content selection in undergraduate LIS education
Zins, Chaim
Bachelor Degrees
Content Analysis
Delphi Studies
Grounded Theory
Information Professions
LIS Education
Undergraduate Education
title_short Content selection in undergraduate LIS education
title_full Content selection in undergraduate LIS education
title_fullStr Content selection in undergraduate LIS education
title_full_unstemmed Content selection in undergraduate LIS education
title_sort Content selection in undergraduate LIS education
author Zins, Chaim
author_facet Zins, Chaim
Santos, Placida L.V.A.C.
author_role author
author2 Santos, Placida L.V.A.C.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Knowledge Mapping Research
Saõ Paulo State University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zins, Chaim
Santos, Placida L.V.A.C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bachelor Degrees
Content Analysis
Delphi Studies
Grounded Theory
Information Professions
LIS Education
Undergraduate Education
topic Bachelor Degrees
Content Analysis
Delphi Studies
Grounded Theory
Information Professions
LIS Education
Undergraduate Education
description The study presented in this article is aimed to improve the academic education in the field of library and information science by structuring the curricular and pedagogical reasoning that shapes the contents of undergraduate academic programs. It was composed of two methodological phases. The first phase was a systematic Critical Delphi study with 21 leading information science scholars from Brazil. The second phase was an unsystematic formative evaluation of the content categories. The evaluation was based on a Grounded Theory study of more than 100 programs worldwide. The study resulted in a universal model that sets the guiding principles for developing bachelor's degree programs applicable worldwide. The model, which is actually composed of two complementary models, is a systematic four step developing process (model1.1) and a structured plan of 288 content categories (model1.2). It is grounded on theoretical foundations and empirical studies.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01
2022-04-28T19:06:55Z
2022-04-28T19:06:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.12783/issn.2328-2967/58/3/1
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, v. 58, n. 3, p. 120-140, 2017.
2328-2967
0748-5786
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220913
10.12783/issn.2328-2967/58/3/1
2-s2.0-85029070627
url http://dx.doi.org/10.12783/issn.2328-2967/58/3/1
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220913
identifier_str_mv Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, v. 58, n. 3, p. 120-140, 2017.
2328-2967
0748-5786
10.12783/issn.2328-2967/58/3/1
2-s2.0-85029070627
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 120-140
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965271900815360