Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: [Anonymous]
Data de Publicação: 2005
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194637
Resumo: The objective of this study was to determine weed species of rubber tree cultivation areas that could serve as reservoirs of predatory mites. The work was conducted in Olimpia, State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, in two rubber tree plantations. Every three months, about 1.000 cm(3) of leaves of each one of the five dominant weeds in each plantation was taken to determine the phytoseiids. As the dominant weeds varied during the study, a total of 20 species were evaluated. Only Cecropia sp. was a dominant weed throughout the study, in both plantations. A total of 336 phytoseiids of the following species were found: Euseius citrifolius Denmark & Muma, 1970, E. concordis (Chant, 1959), Galendromus annectens (DeLeon, 1958), Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma, 1972, Neoseiulus anonymus (Chant & Baker, 1965) and N. tunus (DeLeon,1967). E. citrifolius (189 specimens) and N. tunus (138 specimens) were the most abundant species. The highest abundance (231 specimens) and diversity (5 species) were observed on Cecropia sp. On this plant was found the largest number of mites per sample (29 specimens), followed by Piper duncum Linnaeus (22), Guarea sp. (18) and Ageratum conyzoides Linnaeus (12). E. citrifolius has been determined as the most abundant predatory mite on rubber trees in the region where this work was conducted. Cecropia sp. seems to be the most important of the weeds considered as reservoir of E citrifolius because it is continuously present in the plantations. Complementary studies could indicate the viability of managing this weed in or around rubber tree plantations to promote the biological control of mite pests on that crop.
id UNSP_d6fd8f12aaa89662bac8cfd56797413e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/194637
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivationThe objective of this study was to determine weed species of rubber tree cultivation areas that could serve as reservoirs of predatory mites. The work was conducted in Olimpia, State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, in two rubber tree plantations. Every three months, about 1.000 cm(3) of leaves of each one of the five dominant weeds in each plantation was taken to determine the phytoseiids. As the dominant weeds varied during the study, a total of 20 species were evaluated. Only Cecropia sp. was a dominant weed throughout the study, in both plantations. A total of 336 phytoseiids of the following species were found: Euseius citrifolius Denmark & Muma, 1970, E. concordis (Chant, 1959), Galendromus annectens (DeLeon, 1958), Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma, 1972, Neoseiulus anonymus (Chant & Baker, 1965) and N. tunus (DeLeon,1967). E. citrifolius (189 specimens) and N. tunus (138 specimens) were the most abundant species. The highest abundance (231 specimens) and diversity (5 species) were observed on Cecropia sp. On this plant was found the largest number of mites per sample (29 specimens), followed by Piper duncum Linnaeus (22), Guarea sp. (18) and Ageratum conyzoides Linnaeus (12). E. citrifolius has been determined as the most abundant predatory mite on rubber trees in the region where this work was conducted. Cecropia sp. seems to be the most important of the weeds considered as reservoir of E citrifolius because it is continuously present in the plantations. Complementary studies could indicate the viability of managing this weed in or around rubber tree plantations to promote the biological control of mite pests on that crop.Soc Brasileira Zoologia, Univ Federal ParanaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)[Anonymous]2020-12-10T16:32:44Z2020-12-10T16:32:44Z2005-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article35-42Revista Brasileira De Zoologia. Curitiba: Soc Brasileira Zoologia, Univ Federal Parana, v. 22, n. 1, p. 35-42, 2005.0101-8175http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194637WOS:000228173100005Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista Brasileira De Zoologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T19:11:00Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/194637Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T19:11Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation
title Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation
spellingShingle Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation
[Anonymous]
title_short Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation
title_full Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation
title_fullStr Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation
title_full_unstemmed Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation
title_sort Weeds as alternative substrates to phytoseiids (Acari, Phytoseiidae) in rubbertree Hevea brasilienis, Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) cultivation
author [Anonymous]
author_facet [Anonymous]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv [Anonymous]
description The objective of this study was to determine weed species of rubber tree cultivation areas that could serve as reservoirs of predatory mites. The work was conducted in Olimpia, State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, in two rubber tree plantations. Every three months, about 1.000 cm(3) of leaves of each one of the five dominant weeds in each plantation was taken to determine the phytoseiids. As the dominant weeds varied during the study, a total of 20 species were evaluated. Only Cecropia sp. was a dominant weed throughout the study, in both plantations. A total of 336 phytoseiids of the following species were found: Euseius citrifolius Denmark & Muma, 1970, E. concordis (Chant, 1959), Galendromus annectens (DeLeon, 1958), Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma, 1972, Neoseiulus anonymus (Chant & Baker, 1965) and N. tunus (DeLeon,1967). E. citrifolius (189 specimens) and N. tunus (138 specimens) were the most abundant species. The highest abundance (231 specimens) and diversity (5 species) were observed on Cecropia sp. On this plant was found the largest number of mites per sample (29 specimens), followed by Piper duncum Linnaeus (22), Guarea sp. (18) and Ageratum conyzoides Linnaeus (12). E. citrifolius has been determined as the most abundant predatory mite on rubber trees in the region where this work was conducted. Cecropia sp. seems to be the most important of the weeds considered as reservoir of E citrifolius because it is continuously present in the plantations. Complementary studies could indicate the viability of managing this weed in or around rubber tree plantations to promote the biological control of mite pests on that crop.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-03-01
2020-12-10T16:32:44Z
2020-12-10T16:32:44Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Zoologia. Curitiba: Soc Brasileira Zoologia, Univ Federal Parana, v. 22, n. 1, p. 35-42, 2005.
0101-8175
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194637
WOS:000228173100005
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Zoologia. Curitiba: Soc Brasileira Zoologia, Univ Federal Parana, v. 22, n. 1, p. 35-42, 2005.
0101-8175
WOS:000228173100005
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194637
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Zoologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 35-42
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasileira Zoologia, Univ Federal Parana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasileira Zoologia, Univ Federal Parana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803650014841405440