Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yazbek, P. B.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Matta, P., Passero, L. F. [UNESP], Santos, G. D., Braga, S., Assunção, L., Sauini, T., Cassas, F., Garcia, R. J.F., Honda, S., Barreto, E. H.P., Rodrigues, E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.112123
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/187949
Resumo: Ethnopharmacological relevance: Participatory research can help to broaden the understanding of medical systems and beliefs of traditional communities. An ethnopharmacological survey in collaboration with local people focused on plants used in quilombos located in Southeast Region in Brazil identified cultural factors that influence plant and recipe choice. Aim of the study: To investigate the factors related to the therapeutic efficiency of medicinal plants from the perspective of Quilombo da Fazenda residents. Materials and methods: University researchers collaborated with community residents for both aims and methods of the study. The local partners were trained in the gathering of ethnopharmacological data and then selected and interviewed the residents considered experts on the use of medicinal plants. Data on the use of each species were supported by voucher specimens collected by the local partners and university researchers. Participant observations and field diaries by the university researchers supplemented the data. Results: Eight interviewees mentioned 92 medicinal species with 60 therapeutic uses, applied in 208 recipes or remedies. Asteraceae (13 species), Lamiaceae (5) and Urticaceae (5) contributed most medicinal plant species. Of the 12 etic categories of use, the circulatory system category had the highest number of plants mentioned. Decoction was the most commonly used preparation method (66.8%), and most remedies were administered orally (76.4%). Eighty-six recipes included more than one plant species and/or the addition of other components, such as sugar, salt or animal products. Several cultural factors influence medicinal plant use. Popular beliefs on the quality of blood or the humoral properties of plants and illnesses, characteristics of the plants and other factors determine which plant is used and why. Conclusions: The participatory method identified a large number of factors that influence medicinal plant use: the patient's blood type; the condition of the plant and the disease (hot-cold system); the route of administration and dosage; the preventive uses of the plants; and the influence of other factors, such as the sun, the moon and dew. The participatory approach is useful for gaining insight on the decision processes of medicinal plant use in traditional societies, and also for those communities wanting to document their knowledge with or without the participation of the academy.
id UNSP_d91de2b8221e754f5cd58808065304ed
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/187949
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory surveyAtlantic forestLocal knowledgeMedicinal plantsParticipatory ethnobotanyQuilombolasEthnopharmacological relevance: Participatory research can help to broaden the understanding of medical systems and beliefs of traditional communities. An ethnopharmacological survey in collaboration with local people focused on plants used in quilombos located in Southeast Region in Brazil identified cultural factors that influence plant and recipe choice. Aim of the study: To investigate the factors related to the therapeutic efficiency of medicinal plants from the perspective of Quilombo da Fazenda residents. Materials and methods: University researchers collaborated with community residents for both aims and methods of the study. The local partners were trained in the gathering of ethnopharmacological data and then selected and interviewed the residents considered experts on the use of medicinal plants. Data on the use of each species were supported by voucher specimens collected by the local partners and university researchers. Participant observations and field diaries by the university researchers supplemented the data. Results: Eight interviewees mentioned 92 medicinal species with 60 therapeutic uses, applied in 208 recipes or remedies. Asteraceae (13 species), Lamiaceae (5) and Urticaceae (5) contributed most medicinal plant species. Of the 12 etic categories of use, the circulatory system category had the highest number of plants mentioned. Decoction was the most commonly used preparation method (66.8%), and most remedies were administered orally (76.4%). Eighty-six recipes included more than one plant species and/or the addition of other components, such as sugar, salt or animal products. Several cultural factors influence medicinal plant use. Popular beliefs on the quality of blood or the humoral properties of plants and illnesses, characteristics of the plants and other factors determine which plant is used and why. Conclusions: The participatory method identified a large number of factors that influence medicinal plant use: the patient's blood type; the condition of the plant and the disease (hot-cold system); the route of administration and dosage; the preventive uses of the plants; and the influence of other factors, such as the sun, the moon and dew. The participatory approach is useful for gaining insight on the decision processes of medicinal plant use in traditional societies, and also for those communities wanting to document their knowledge with or without the participation of the academy.Center for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies – Institute of Environmental Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Universidade Federal de São PauloCenter for Amerindian Studies (CEstA) Universidade de São PauloInstitute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Quilombo da Fazenda Heritage AssociationMunicipal Herbarium – PMSP, São PauloInstitute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Quilombo da Fazenda Heritage AssociationMunicipal Herbarium – PMSPYazbek, P. B.Matta, P.Passero, L. F. [UNESP]Santos, G. D.Braga, S.Assunção, L.Sauini, T.Cassas, F.Garcia, R. J.F.Honda, S.Barreto, E. H.P.Rodrigues, E.2019-10-06T15:52:13Z2019-10-06T15:52:13Z2019-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.112123Journal of Ethnopharmacology, v. 244.1872-75730378-8741http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18794910.1016/j.jep.2019.1121232-s2.0-85070530165Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Ethnopharmacologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T20:19:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/187949Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T20:19:29Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey
title Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey
spellingShingle Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey
Yazbek, P. B.
Atlantic forest
Local knowledge
Medicinal plants
Participatory ethnobotany
Quilombolas
title_short Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey
title_full Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey
title_fullStr Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey
title_full_unstemmed Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey
title_sort Plants utilized as medicines by residents of Quilombo da Fazenda, Núcleo Picinguaba, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil: A participatory survey
author Yazbek, P. B.
author_facet Yazbek, P. B.
Matta, P.
Passero, L. F. [UNESP]
Santos, G. D.
Braga, S.
Assunção, L.
Sauini, T.
Cassas, F.
Garcia, R. J.F.
Honda, S.
Barreto, E. H.P.
Rodrigues, E.
author_role author
author2 Matta, P.
Passero, L. F. [UNESP]
Santos, G. D.
Braga, S.
Assunção, L.
Sauini, T.
Cassas, F.
Garcia, R. J.F.
Honda, S.
Barreto, E. H.P.
Rodrigues, E.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Quilombo da Fazenda Heritage Association
Municipal Herbarium – PMSP
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yazbek, P. B.
Matta, P.
Passero, L. F. [UNESP]
Santos, G. D.
Braga, S.
Assunção, L.
Sauini, T.
Cassas, F.
Garcia, R. J.F.
Honda, S.
Barreto, E. H.P.
Rodrigues, E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Atlantic forest
Local knowledge
Medicinal plants
Participatory ethnobotany
Quilombolas
topic Atlantic forest
Local knowledge
Medicinal plants
Participatory ethnobotany
Quilombolas
description Ethnopharmacological relevance: Participatory research can help to broaden the understanding of medical systems and beliefs of traditional communities. An ethnopharmacological survey in collaboration with local people focused on plants used in quilombos located in Southeast Region in Brazil identified cultural factors that influence plant and recipe choice. Aim of the study: To investigate the factors related to the therapeutic efficiency of medicinal plants from the perspective of Quilombo da Fazenda residents. Materials and methods: University researchers collaborated with community residents for both aims and methods of the study. The local partners were trained in the gathering of ethnopharmacological data and then selected and interviewed the residents considered experts on the use of medicinal plants. Data on the use of each species were supported by voucher specimens collected by the local partners and university researchers. Participant observations and field diaries by the university researchers supplemented the data. Results: Eight interviewees mentioned 92 medicinal species with 60 therapeutic uses, applied in 208 recipes or remedies. Asteraceae (13 species), Lamiaceae (5) and Urticaceae (5) contributed most medicinal plant species. Of the 12 etic categories of use, the circulatory system category had the highest number of plants mentioned. Decoction was the most commonly used preparation method (66.8%), and most remedies were administered orally (76.4%). Eighty-six recipes included more than one plant species and/or the addition of other components, such as sugar, salt or animal products. Several cultural factors influence medicinal plant use. Popular beliefs on the quality of blood or the humoral properties of plants and illnesses, characteristics of the plants and other factors determine which plant is used and why. Conclusions: The participatory method identified a large number of factors that influence medicinal plant use: the patient's blood type; the condition of the plant and the disease (hot-cold system); the route of administration and dosage; the preventive uses of the plants; and the influence of other factors, such as the sun, the moon and dew. The participatory approach is useful for gaining insight on the decision processes of medicinal plant use in traditional societies, and also for those communities wanting to document their knowledge with or without the participation of the academy.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T15:52:13Z
2019-10-06T15:52:13Z
2019-11-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.112123
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, v. 244.
1872-7573
0378-8741
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/187949
10.1016/j.jep.2019.112123
2-s2.0-85070530165
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.112123
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/187949
identifier_str_mv Journal of Ethnopharmacology, v. 244.
1872-7573
0378-8741
10.1016/j.jep.2019.112123
2-s2.0-85070530165
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Ethnopharmacology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965608166555648