Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2019.3608 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199517 |
Resumo: | Background: Cellulose biomembranes may be used for difficult-to-treat ulcers. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of cellulose biomem-branes compared to a collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers. Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed using two groups: one treated with collagenase dressing and the other with cellulose biomembrane over a 90-day (T90) period. Both groups received compression therapy. The primary outcome was reduction in ulcer area at T90. Secondary outcomes were healing status, decrease in devitalized tissue and exudate, vascular fraction, change in quality of life, and safety. Results: We randomized 46 participants with 73 venous ulcers (21 with 36 ulcers in the collagenase group and 25 with 37 ulcers in the biomembrane group). A decrease in ulcer area occurred at T90 in both groups, but the difference was not significant. Complete healing before T90 occurred for seven ulcers in the collagenase group and 12 ulcers in the biomembrane group, without significant difference. However, the biomembrane promoted increased precocious healing (p = 0.02). Improved bed vitality and quality of life was observed as a function of time (p <. 0.01), but this was not significant between the groups. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD34 showed an increase in vascular fraction in both groups (p< 0.01), with a higher level in the biomembrane group (p < 0.05). No adverse events were considered related to the products. Conclusion: Cellulose biomem-branes, in combination with compressive therapy, are effective and safe for the treatment of venous ulcers and provide results similar to those with collagenase treatment. |
id |
UNSP_da1bfbc904ca797028e1c79b46f0251e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199517 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trialcellulose biomembranechronic venous ulcerclinical trialcollagenasetherapyBackground: Cellulose biomembranes may be used for difficult-to-treat ulcers. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of cellulose biomem-branes compared to a collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers. Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed using two groups: one treated with collagenase dressing and the other with cellulose biomembrane over a 90-day (T90) period. Both groups received compression therapy. The primary outcome was reduction in ulcer area at T90. Secondary outcomes were healing status, decrease in devitalized tissue and exudate, vascular fraction, change in quality of life, and safety. Results: We randomized 46 participants with 73 venous ulcers (21 with 36 ulcers in the collagenase group and 25 with 37 ulcers in the biomembrane group). A decrease in ulcer area occurred at T90 in both groups, but the difference was not significant. Complete healing before T90 occurred for seven ulcers in the collagenase group and 12 ulcers in the biomembrane group, without significant difference. However, the biomembrane promoted increased precocious healing (p = 0.02). Improved bed vitality and quality of life was observed as a function of time (p <. 0.01), but this was not significant between the groups. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD34 showed an increase in vascular fraction in both groups (p< 0.01), with a higher level in the biomembrane group (p < 0.05). No adverse events were considered related to the products. Conclusion: Cellulose biomem-branes, in combination with compressive therapy, are effective and safe for the treatment of venous ulcers and provide results similar to those with collagenase treatment.Nursing Department Botucatu Medical School/UNESPDermatology and Radiotherapy Department Botucatu Medical School/UNESPPathology Department Botucatu Medical School/UNESPInnovatecs Center for Research and Biotechnological DevelopmentNursing Department Botucatu Medical School/UNESPDermatology and Radiotherapy Department Botucatu Medical School/UNESPPathology Department Botucatu Medical School/UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Innovatecs Center for Research and Biotechnological DevelopmentColenci, Raquel [UNESP]Miot, Hélio A. [UNESP]Marques, Mariângela E. A. [UNESP]Schmitt, Juliano V. [UNESP]Basmaji, PierreJacinto, Jéssica dos Santos [UNESP]Abbade, Luciana P. F. [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:42:03Z2020-12-12T01:42:03Z2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article387-395http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2019.3608European Journal of Dermatology, v. 29, n. 4, p. 387-395, 2019.1952-40131167-1122http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19951710.1684/ejd.2019.36082-s2.0-85073583718Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Journal of Dermatologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-03T13:18:43Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199517Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-03T13:18:43Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial Colenci, Raquel [UNESP] cellulose biomembrane chronic venous ulcer clinical trial collagenase therapy |
title_short |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_full |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
title_sort |
Cellulose biomembrane versus collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial |
author |
Colenci, Raquel [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Colenci, Raquel [UNESP] Miot, Hélio A. [UNESP] Marques, Mariângela E. A. [UNESP] Schmitt, Juliano V. [UNESP] Basmaji, Pierre Jacinto, Jéssica dos Santos [UNESP] Abbade, Luciana P. F. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miot, Hélio A. [UNESP] Marques, Mariângela E. A. [UNESP] Schmitt, Juliano V. [UNESP] Basmaji, Pierre Jacinto, Jéssica dos Santos [UNESP] Abbade, Luciana P. F. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Innovatecs Center for Research and Biotechnological Development |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Colenci, Raquel [UNESP] Miot, Hélio A. [UNESP] Marques, Mariângela E. A. [UNESP] Schmitt, Juliano V. [UNESP] Basmaji, Pierre Jacinto, Jéssica dos Santos [UNESP] Abbade, Luciana P. F. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cellulose biomembrane chronic venous ulcer clinical trial collagenase therapy |
topic |
cellulose biomembrane chronic venous ulcer clinical trial collagenase therapy |
description |
Background: Cellulose biomembranes may be used for difficult-to-treat ulcers. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of cellulose biomem-branes compared to a collagenase dressing for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers. Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed using two groups: one treated with collagenase dressing and the other with cellulose biomembrane over a 90-day (T90) period. Both groups received compression therapy. The primary outcome was reduction in ulcer area at T90. Secondary outcomes were healing status, decrease in devitalized tissue and exudate, vascular fraction, change in quality of life, and safety. Results: We randomized 46 participants with 73 venous ulcers (21 with 36 ulcers in the collagenase group and 25 with 37 ulcers in the biomembrane group). A decrease in ulcer area occurred at T90 in both groups, but the difference was not significant. Complete healing before T90 occurred for seven ulcers in the collagenase group and 12 ulcers in the biomembrane group, without significant difference. However, the biomembrane promoted increased precocious healing (p = 0.02). Improved bed vitality and quality of life was observed as a function of time (p <. 0.01), but this was not significant between the groups. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD34 showed an increase in vascular fraction in both groups (p< 0.01), with a higher level in the biomembrane group (p < 0.05). No adverse events were considered related to the products. Conclusion: Cellulose biomem-branes, in combination with compressive therapy, are effective and safe for the treatment of venous ulcers and provide results similar to those with collagenase treatment. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-01 2020-12-12T01:42:03Z 2020-12-12T01:42:03Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2019.3608 European Journal of Dermatology, v. 29, n. 4, p. 387-395, 2019. 1952-4013 1167-1122 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199517 10.1684/ejd.2019.3608 2-s2.0-85073583718 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2019.3608 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199517 |
identifier_str_mv |
European Journal of Dermatology, v. 29, n. 4, p. 387-395, 2019. 1952-4013 1167-1122 10.1684/ejd.2019.3608 2-s2.0-85073583718 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Journal of Dermatology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
387-395 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1810021425439834112 |