Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Fabiana A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Piza, Marina L.S.T. [UNESP], Bassetto, César C. [UNESP], Starling, Renan Z.C. [UNESP], Albuquerque, Ana Cláudia A. [UNESP], Protes, Verena M. [UNESP], Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP], Castilhos, André M. [UNESP], Costa, Ciniro [UNESP], Amarante, Alessandro F.T. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180064
Resumo: Lamb performance was evaluated in four integrated crop-livestock (ICL) systems. The ICL areas were previously planted with maize and marandu palisade grass in December 2013. ICL systems 1 and 2 were also seeded with pigeon pea. After harvesting in April 2014, black oats were sown in rows (ICL 1 and 3) or by broadcast seeding (ICL 2 and 4). Each ICL area was divided into 12 paddocks of 225 m2 to be grazed by young sheep from July 23 to September 30, 2014. To determine if the pasture remained contaminated by free-living stages of sheep gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) after approximately ten months without animals in the area, 12 worm-free “tracer” lambs (n = 3/ ICL system) grazed each ICL pasture for 14 consecutive days in July 2015 and were later housed in pens, where they remained for another 14 days. The tracer lambs acquired no worm infections, demonstrating that the area was cleared after 300 days without animals. To evaluate GIN infection and uncastrated male lamb performance, we used 60 (n = 15/ system) Poll Dorset x Corriedale (crossbred) sheep with mean body weights of 24.4 ± 3.4 kg from July to September 2015 and 48 (n = 12/ system) Texel x Corriedale sheep with body weights of 26.4 ± 3.5 kg from June to September 2016. Lambs were allocated to the following groups: Group 1 rotated on the 12 ICL1 paddocks; Group 2 rotated on the 12 ICL2 paddocks; Group 3 rotated on the 12 ICL3 paddocks; and Group 4 rotated on the 12 ICL4 paddocks. Each paddock was grazed by sheep twice for three days, with a 33-day interval between grazing. At the end of the day the lambs were supplemented with concentrate plus silage. Groups 1 and 2 received mixed silage made of maize, marandu palisade grass and pigeon pea and groups 3 and 4 received mixed silage made of maize and marandu palisade grass. Faecal and blood samples were taken from all the animals every two weeks, and body weight was recorded on the same occasion. Nematode faecal egg counts (FEC), packed cell volume and total plasma protein means did not differ (P > 0.05) between the four lamb groups. In 2015, throughout the experimental period, the FEC decreased in all animals, with 6733 and 1407 eggs per gram (EPG) on average at the beginning and end of the trial, respectively. At the beginning of the trial in 2016, the animals had mild GIN infections (1077 EPG on average), and the individual faecal egg counts did not exceed 10,000 EPG during the trial. In decreasing order, Haemonchus spp., Trichostrongylus spp. and Cooperia spp. third stage larvae were found in the faecal cultures in both years. The performance of lambs were similar in the four ICL systems (P > 0.05), in the first and second years, the daily weight gains were 0.192 ± 0.05 kg and 0.221 ± 0.06 kg, respectively. In conclusion, a period of withdrawal of contaminated sheep results in plots free of infective larvae. The use of clean pastures during the dry season, in the different ICL systems, associated with a good nutrition plan, resulted in progressively declining degrees of GIN infections and satisfactory daily weight gain of young sheep.
id UNSP_da1e90f298039e435f1e16a4ab83980b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/180064
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)ControlHaemonchusnematodesSustainabilityTrichostrongylusLamb performance was evaluated in four integrated crop-livestock (ICL) systems. The ICL areas were previously planted with maize and marandu palisade grass in December 2013. ICL systems 1 and 2 were also seeded with pigeon pea. After harvesting in April 2014, black oats were sown in rows (ICL 1 and 3) or by broadcast seeding (ICL 2 and 4). Each ICL area was divided into 12 paddocks of 225 m2 to be grazed by young sheep from July 23 to September 30, 2014. To determine if the pasture remained contaminated by free-living stages of sheep gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) after approximately ten months without animals in the area, 12 worm-free “tracer” lambs (n = 3/ ICL system) grazed each ICL pasture for 14 consecutive days in July 2015 and were later housed in pens, where they remained for another 14 days. The tracer lambs acquired no worm infections, demonstrating that the area was cleared after 300 days without animals. To evaluate GIN infection and uncastrated male lamb performance, we used 60 (n = 15/ system) Poll Dorset x Corriedale (crossbred) sheep with mean body weights of 24.4 ± 3.4 kg from July to September 2015 and 48 (n = 12/ system) Texel x Corriedale sheep with body weights of 26.4 ± 3.5 kg from June to September 2016. Lambs were allocated to the following groups: Group 1 rotated on the 12 ICL1 paddocks; Group 2 rotated on the 12 ICL2 paddocks; Group 3 rotated on the 12 ICL3 paddocks; and Group 4 rotated on the 12 ICL4 paddocks. Each paddock was grazed by sheep twice for three days, with a 33-day interval between grazing. At the end of the day the lambs were supplemented with concentrate plus silage. Groups 1 and 2 received mixed silage made of maize, marandu palisade grass and pigeon pea and groups 3 and 4 received mixed silage made of maize and marandu palisade grass. Faecal and blood samples were taken from all the animals every two weeks, and body weight was recorded on the same occasion. Nematode faecal egg counts (FEC), packed cell volume and total plasma protein means did not differ (P > 0.05) between the four lamb groups. In 2015, throughout the experimental period, the FEC decreased in all animals, with 6733 and 1407 eggs per gram (EPG) on average at the beginning and end of the trial, respectively. At the beginning of the trial in 2016, the animals had mild GIN infections (1077 EPG on average), and the individual faecal egg counts did not exceed 10,000 EPG during the trial. In decreasing order, Haemonchus spp., Trichostrongylus spp. and Cooperia spp. third stage larvae were found in the faecal cultures in both years. The performance of lambs were similar in the four ICL systems (P > 0.05), in the first and second years, the daily weight gains were 0.192 ± 0.05 kg and 0.221 ± 0.06 kg, respectively. In conclusion, a period of withdrawal of contaminated sheep results in plots free of infective larvae. The use of clean pastures during the dry season, in the different ICL systems, associated with a good nutrition plan, resulted in progressively declining degrees of GIN infections and satisfactory daily weight gain of young sheep.Fundação AgrisusFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)FAPESP: #2013/13702-3FAPESP: #2013/23853-9FAPESP: #2015/25413-1FAPESP: #2015/25718-7CNPq: #458225/2014-2CNPq: #502234/2014-8Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Almeida, Fabiana A. [UNESP]Piza, Marina L.S.T. [UNESP]Bassetto, César C. [UNESP]Starling, Renan Z.C. [UNESP]Albuquerque, Ana Cláudia A. [UNESP]Protes, Verena M. [UNESP]Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]Castilhos, André M. [UNESP]Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]Amarante, Alessandro F.T. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:37:52Z2018-12-11T17:37:52Z2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article66-72application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.009Small Ruminant Research, v. 166, p. 66-72.0921-4488http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18006410.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.0092-s2.0-850506808612-s2.0-85050680861.pdf97909982126355630000-0003-1854-2927Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSmall Ruminant Research0,485info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-06T18:55:37Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/180064Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-06T18:55:37Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)
title Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)
spellingShingle Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)
Almeida, Fabiana A. [UNESP]
Control
Haemonchus
nematodes
Sustainability
Trichostrongylus
title_short Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)
title_full Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)
title_fullStr Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)
title_full_unstemmed Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)
title_sort Infection with gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs in different integrated crop-livestock systems (ICL)
author Almeida, Fabiana A. [UNESP]
author_facet Almeida, Fabiana A. [UNESP]
Piza, Marina L.S.T. [UNESP]
Bassetto, César C. [UNESP]
Starling, Renan Z.C. [UNESP]
Albuquerque, Ana Cláudia A. [UNESP]
Protes, Verena M. [UNESP]
Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]
Castilhos, André M. [UNESP]
Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]
Amarante, Alessandro F.T. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Piza, Marina L.S.T. [UNESP]
Bassetto, César C. [UNESP]
Starling, Renan Z.C. [UNESP]
Albuquerque, Ana Cláudia A. [UNESP]
Protes, Verena M. [UNESP]
Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]
Castilhos, André M. [UNESP]
Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]
Amarante, Alessandro F.T. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Fabiana A. [UNESP]
Piza, Marina L.S.T. [UNESP]
Bassetto, César C. [UNESP]
Starling, Renan Z.C. [UNESP]
Albuquerque, Ana Cláudia A. [UNESP]
Protes, Verena M. [UNESP]
Pariz, Cristiano M. [UNESP]
Castilhos, André M. [UNESP]
Costa, Ciniro [UNESP]
Amarante, Alessandro F.T. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Control
Haemonchus
nematodes
Sustainability
Trichostrongylus
topic Control
Haemonchus
nematodes
Sustainability
Trichostrongylus
description Lamb performance was evaluated in four integrated crop-livestock (ICL) systems. The ICL areas were previously planted with maize and marandu palisade grass in December 2013. ICL systems 1 and 2 were also seeded with pigeon pea. After harvesting in April 2014, black oats were sown in rows (ICL 1 and 3) or by broadcast seeding (ICL 2 and 4). Each ICL area was divided into 12 paddocks of 225 m2 to be grazed by young sheep from July 23 to September 30, 2014. To determine if the pasture remained contaminated by free-living stages of sheep gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) after approximately ten months without animals in the area, 12 worm-free “tracer” lambs (n = 3/ ICL system) grazed each ICL pasture for 14 consecutive days in July 2015 and were later housed in pens, where they remained for another 14 days. The tracer lambs acquired no worm infections, demonstrating that the area was cleared after 300 days without animals. To evaluate GIN infection and uncastrated male lamb performance, we used 60 (n = 15/ system) Poll Dorset x Corriedale (crossbred) sheep with mean body weights of 24.4 ± 3.4 kg from July to September 2015 and 48 (n = 12/ system) Texel x Corriedale sheep with body weights of 26.4 ± 3.5 kg from June to September 2016. Lambs were allocated to the following groups: Group 1 rotated on the 12 ICL1 paddocks; Group 2 rotated on the 12 ICL2 paddocks; Group 3 rotated on the 12 ICL3 paddocks; and Group 4 rotated on the 12 ICL4 paddocks. Each paddock was grazed by sheep twice for three days, with a 33-day interval between grazing. At the end of the day the lambs were supplemented with concentrate plus silage. Groups 1 and 2 received mixed silage made of maize, marandu palisade grass and pigeon pea and groups 3 and 4 received mixed silage made of maize and marandu palisade grass. Faecal and blood samples were taken from all the animals every two weeks, and body weight was recorded on the same occasion. Nematode faecal egg counts (FEC), packed cell volume and total plasma protein means did not differ (P > 0.05) between the four lamb groups. In 2015, throughout the experimental period, the FEC decreased in all animals, with 6733 and 1407 eggs per gram (EPG) on average at the beginning and end of the trial, respectively. At the beginning of the trial in 2016, the animals had mild GIN infections (1077 EPG on average), and the individual faecal egg counts did not exceed 10,000 EPG during the trial. In decreasing order, Haemonchus spp., Trichostrongylus spp. and Cooperia spp. third stage larvae were found in the faecal cultures in both years. The performance of lambs were similar in the four ICL systems (P > 0.05), in the first and second years, the daily weight gains were 0.192 ± 0.05 kg and 0.221 ± 0.06 kg, respectively. In conclusion, a period of withdrawal of contaminated sheep results in plots free of infective larvae. The use of clean pastures during the dry season, in the different ICL systems, associated with a good nutrition plan, resulted in progressively declining degrees of GIN infections and satisfactory daily weight gain of young sheep.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T17:37:52Z
2018-12-11T17:37:52Z
2018-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.009
Small Ruminant Research, v. 166, p. 66-72.
0921-4488
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180064
10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.009
2-s2.0-85050680861
2-s2.0-85050680861.pdf
9790998212635563
0000-0003-1854-2927
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180064
identifier_str_mv Small Ruminant Research, v. 166, p. 66-72.
0921-4488
10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.009
2-s2.0-85050680861
2-s2.0-85050680861.pdf
9790998212635563
0000-0003-1854-2927
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Small Ruminant Research
0,485
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 66-72
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021341443653632