Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Minto, Bruno Watanabe [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Filgueira, Fabrícia Geovânia Fernandes [UNESP], de Alcântara, Brenda Mendonça [UNESP], Sargi, Laís Fernanda [UNESP], Moi, Tryssia Scalon Magalhães [UNESP], Dias, Luis Gustavo Gosuen Gonçalves [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.113851
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223250
Resumo: Background: Many variations of ovariohysterectomy techniques have been described, including the traditional one and minimally invasive procedures. Non-laparoscopic Snook hook technique is an alternative for performing minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy. Few studies have been carried out in order to assess pain in animals submitted to minimally invasive surgeries, especially involving one of the most performed surgical procedures in veterinary practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical duration, intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain after traditional ovariohysterectomy or minimally invasive non-laparoscopic technique in dogs using Snook hook. The hypothesis is that non-laparoscopic minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy would be faster and less painful than the conventional technique. Material, Methods & Results: Thirty dogs were divided into Traditional Group (TG = 15) and Minimally Invasive Group (MIG = 15). Heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, body temperature, oxyhemoglobin saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (ETCO2) and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were evaluated before the surgery begins (M0), during incision (M1), clamping of the first ovarian pedicle (M2), second ovarian pedicle (M3), uterine cervix (M4), abdominal suture (M5) and at the end of surgery (M6). The modified Glasgow Pain Scale was used for acute postoperative pain assessment and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the sensitivity of surgical wound. The level of significance established for all statistical analysis was 5%. Statistical differences were not observed between groups considering total surgical time and postoperative acute pain intensity (P > 0.05), in spite of MIG having shorter duration of surgery. There was no statistical difference between groups considering all intraoperative parameters except respiratory rate (TG < MIG; P < 0.05) and ETCO2 (MIG < TG; P < 0.05) at the moment of traction of the first ovarian pedicle (M2). Pain assessment by VAS showed statistical difference 24h after the end of surgery (TG < MIG) (P < 0.05). Discussion: Both procedures were similar regarding intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain. It is possible that the sensation of pain in both procedures was blocked by the effectiveness of analgesics, once they might cause an inhibition of painful behaviors limiting a possible difference in pain identification. Higher respiratory stress observed in MIG at M2 and higher pain score by VAS noted in MIG 24 h after the end of surgery can be justified by greater traction of ovarian pedicle, due to limited surgical access of minimally invasive technique. Minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy non-laparoscopic seems to be potentially faster, probably due to the smaller size of the abdominal incision, which takes less time to be closed. In the present study, both techniques were performed by an experienced surgeon, providing safe procedures, nevertheless it is important to emphasize that iatrogenic injury can be caused by surgeons non-proficient in the Snook hook technique, considering the limited visualization of anatomical abdominal structures. Data obtained indicate that traditional ovariohysterectomy and non-laparoscopic Snook hook technique promote similar intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain, however minimally invasive procedure is potentially faster with less surgical trauma.
id UNSP_dae333d9ef595716d7cf1d4a8d54fe42
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223250
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in DogsCanineCastrationOvarySnook hookBackground: Many variations of ovariohysterectomy techniques have been described, including the traditional one and minimally invasive procedures. Non-laparoscopic Snook hook technique is an alternative for performing minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy. Few studies have been carried out in order to assess pain in animals submitted to minimally invasive surgeries, especially involving one of the most performed surgical procedures in veterinary practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical duration, intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain after traditional ovariohysterectomy or minimally invasive non-laparoscopic technique in dogs using Snook hook. The hypothesis is that non-laparoscopic minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy would be faster and less painful than the conventional technique. Material, Methods & Results: Thirty dogs were divided into Traditional Group (TG = 15) and Minimally Invasive Group (MIG = 15). Heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, body temperature, oxyhemoglobin saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (ETCO2) and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were evaluated before the surgery begins (M0), during incision (M1), clamping of the first ovarian pedicle (M2), second ovarian pedicle (M3), uterine cervix (M4), abdominal suture (M5) and at the end of surgery (M6). The modified Glasgow Pain Scale was used for acute postoperative pain assessment and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the sensitivity of surgical wound. The level of significance established for all statistical analysis was 5%. Statistical differences were not observed between groups considering total surgical time and postoperative acute pain intensity (P > 0.05), in spite of MIG having shorter duration of surgery. There was no statistical difference between groups considering all intraoperative parameters except respiratory rate (TG < MIG; P < 0.05) and ETCO2 (MIG < TG; P < 0.05) at the moment of traction of the first ovarian pedicle (M2). Pain assessment by VAS showed statistical difference 24h after the end of surgery (TG < MIG) (P < 0.05). Discussion: Both procedures were similar regarding intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain. It is possible that the sensation of pain in both procedures was blocked by the effectiveness of analgesics, once they might cause an inhibition of painful behaviors limiting a possible difference in pain identification. Higher respiratory stress observed in MIG at M2 and higher pain score by VAS noted in MIG 24 h after the end of surgery can be justified by greater traction of ovarian pedicle, due to limited surgical access of minimally invasive technique. Minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy non-laparoscopic seems to be potentially faster, probably due to the smaller size of the abdominal incision, which takes less time to be closed. In the present study, both techniques were performed by an experienced surgeon, providing safe procedures, nevertheless it is important to emphasize that iatrogenic injury can be caused by surgeons non-proficient in the Snook hook technique, considering the limited visualization of anatomical abdominal structures. Data obtained indicate that traditional ovariohysterectomy and non-laparoscopic Snook hook technique promote similar intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain, however minimally invasive procedure is potentially faster with less surgical trauma.Faculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SPFaculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Minto, Bruno Watanabe [UNESP]Filgueira, Fabrícia Geovânia Fernandes [UNESP]de Alcântara, Brenda Mendonça [UNESP]Sargi, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]Moi, Tryssia Scalon Magalhães [UNESP]Dias, Luis Gustavo Gosuen Gonçalves [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:49:33Z2022-04-28T19:49:33Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.113851Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, v. 49.1679-92161678-0345http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22325010.22456/1679-9216.1138512-s2.0-85122794989Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Scientiae Veterinariaeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:49:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223250Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:45:20.846999Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs
title Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs
spellingShingle Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs
Minto, Bruno Watanabe [UNESP]
Canine
Castration
Ovary
Snook hook
title_short Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs
title_full Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs
title_fullStr Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs
title_sort Comparison of Intraoperative Nociception and Postoperative Acute Pain after Traditional or Minimally Invasive Ovariohysterectomy in Dogs
author Minto, Bruno Watanabe [UNESP]
author_facet Minto, Bruno Watanabe [UNESP]
Filgueira, Fabrícia Geovânia Fernandes [UNESP]
de Alcântara, Brenda Mendonça [UNESP]
Sargi, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]
Moi, Tryssia Scalon Magalhães [UNESP]
Dias, Luis Gustavo Gosuen Gonçalves [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Filgueira, Fabrícia Geovânia Fernandes [UNESP]
de Alcântara, Brenda Mendonça [UNESP]
Sargi, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]
Moi, Tryssia Scalon Magalhães [UNESP]
Dias, Luis Gustavo Gosuen Gonçalves [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Minto, Bruno Watanabe [UNESP]
Filgueira, Fabrícia Geovânia Fernandes [UNESP]
de Alcântara, Brenda Mendonça [UNESP]
Sargi, Laís Fernanda [UNESP]
Moi, Tryssia Scalon Magalhães [UNESP]
Dias, Luis Gustavo Gosuen Gonçalves [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Canine
Castration
Ovary
Snook hook
topic Canine
Castration
Ovary
Snook hook
description Background: Many variations of ovariohysterectomy techniques have been described, including the traditional one and minimally invasive procedures. Non-laparoscopic Snook hook technique is an alternative for performing minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy. Few studies have been carried out in order to assess pain in animals submitted to minimally invasive surgeries, especially involving one of the most performed surgical procedures in veterinary practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical duration, intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain after traditional ovariohysterectomy or minimally invasive non-laparoscopic technique in dogs using Snook hook. The hypothesis is that non-laparoscopic minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy would be faster and less painful than the conventional technique. Material, Methods & Results: Thirty dogs were divided into Traditional Group (TG = 15) and Minimally Invasive Group (MIG = 15). Heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, body temperature, oxyhemoglobin saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (ETCO2) and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were evaluated before the surgery begins (M0), during incision (M1), clamping of the first ovarian pedicle (M2), second ovarian pedicle (M3), uterine cervix (M4), abdominal suture (M5) and at the end of surgery (M6). The modified Glasgow Pain Scale was used for acute postoperative pain assessment and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the sensitivity of surgical wound. The level of significance established for all statistical analysis was 5%. Statistical differences were not observed between groups considering total surgical time and postoperative acute pain intensity (P > 0.05), in spite of MIG having shorter duration of surgery. There was no statistical difference between groups considering all intraoperative parameters except respiratory rate (TG < MIG; P < 0.05) and ETCO2 (MIG < TG; P < 0.05) at the moment of traction of the first ovarian pedicle (M2). Pain assessment by VAS showed statistical difference 24h after the end of surgery (TG < MIG) (P < 0.05). Discussion: Both procedures were similar regarding intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain. It is possible that the sensation of pain in both procedures was blocked by the effectiveness of analgesics, once they might cause an inhibition of painful behaviors limiting a possible difference in pain identification. Higher respiratory stress observed in MIG at M2 and higher pain score by VAS noted in MIG 24 h after the end of surgery can be justified by greater traction of ovarian pedicle, due to limited surgical access of minimally invasive technique. Minimally invasive ovariohysterectomy non-laparoscopic seems to be potentially faster, probably due to the smaller size of the abdominal incision, which takes less time to be closed. In the present study, both techniques were performed by an experienced surgeon, providing safe procedures, nevertheless it is important to emphasize that iatrogenic injury can be caused by surgeons non-proficient in the Snook hook technique, considering the limited visualization of anatomical abdominal structures. Data obtained indicate that traditional ovariohysterectomy and non-laparoscopic Snook hook technique promote similar intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain, however minimally invasive procedure is potentially faster with less surgical trauma.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-28T19:49:33Z
2022-04-28T19:49:33Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.113851
Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, v. 49.
1679-9216
1678-0345
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223250
10.22456/1679-9216.113851
2-s2.0-85122794989
url http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.113851
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223250
identifier_str_mv Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, v. 49.
1679-9216
1678-0345
10.22456/1679-9216.113851
2-s2.0-85122794989
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiae Veterinariae
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128853145550848