Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195698 |
Resumo: | Data on growth and reproduction of 573 females Guzerat beef cattle born between 1961 and 1985, at Fazenda Canoas, located in the county of Curvelo, MG, Brazil, were used to obtain a growth pattern for the breed, through the use of a mathematical model. Weight-age data, collected up to 1992, were used to fit five nonlinear models: Brody, Bertalanffy, Logistic, Gompertz, and Richard. Estimated assyntotic weight and growth rate were, respectively, for Brody model 464.49 and 0.046; for Bertalanffy model 453.18 and 0.065; for Logistic model 447.05 and 0.085; for Gompertz model 449.89 and 0.075, and for Richards model 458.26 and 0.055. Richards model presented computational difficulty to fit the data. Other models showed good fit to the data, and presented little variations on the criteria chosen. Bertalanffy model showed a better goodness of fit on the set of criteria and was the choice to describe the growth patterns of Guzerat cattle. |
id |
UNSP_dba7f7157db9dcc2df8cd9b5ea0479a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195698 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle femalesweightmaturationgrowth ratemathematical modelsData on growth and reproduction of 573 females Guzerat beef cattle born between 1961 and 1985, at Fazenda Canoas, located in the county of Curvelo, MG, Brazil, were used to obtain a growth pattern for the breed, through the use of a mathematical model. Weight-age data, collected up to 1992, were used to fit five nonlinear models: Brody, Bertalanffy, Logistic, Gompertz, and Richard. Estimated assyntotic weight and growth rate were, respectively, for Brody model 464.49 and 0.046; for Bertalanffy model 453.18 and 0.065; for Logistic model 447.05 and 0.085; for Gompertz model 449.89 and 0.075, and for Richards model 458.26 and 0.055. Richards model presented computational difficulty to fit the data. Other models showed good fit to the data, and presented little variations on the criteria chosen. Bertalanffy model showed a better goodness of fit on the set of criteria and was the choice to describe the growth patterns of Guzerat cattle.Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Melhoramento & Nutr Anim, BR-18618000 Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Melhoramento & Nutr Anim, BR-18618000 Botucatu, SP, BrazilEmpresa Brasil Pesq AgropecUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Oliveira, H. N. deLobo, R. B.Pereira, C. S.2020-12-10T18:00:32Z2020-12-10T18:00:32Z2000-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1843-1851Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. Brasilia Df: Empresa Brasil Pesq Agropec, v. 35, n. 9, p. 1843-1851, 2000.0100-204Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/195698WOS:000165260600017Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporPesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-06T18:54:36Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195698Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-06T18:54:36Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females |
title |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females Oliveira, H. N. de weight maturation growth rate mathematical models |
title_short |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females |
title_full |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females |
title_sort |
Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth of Guzerat beef cattle females |
author |
Oliveira, H. N. de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, H. N. de Lobo, R. B. Pereira, C. S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lobo, R. B. Pereira, C. S. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, H. N. de Lobo, R. B. Pereira, C. S. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
weight maturation growth rate mathematical models |
topic |
weight maturation growth rate mathematical models |
description |
Data on growth and reproduction of 573 females Guzerat beef cattle born between 1961 and 1985, at Fazenda Canoas, located in the county of Curvelo, MG, Brazil, were used to obtain a growth pattern for the breed, through the use of a mathematical model. Weight-age data, collected up to 1992, were used to fit five nonlinear models: Brody, Bertalanffy, Logistic, Gompertz, and Richard. Estimated assyntotic weight and growth rate were, respectively, for Brody model 464.49 and 0.046; for Bertalanffy model 453.18 and 0.065; for Logistic model 447.05 and 0.085; for Gompertz model 449.89 and 0.075, and for Richards model 458.26 and 0.055. Richards model presented computational difficulty to fit the data. Other models showed good fit to the data, and presented little variations on the criteria chosen. Bertalanffy model showed a better goodness of fit on the set of criteria and was the choice to describe the growth patterns of Guzerat cattle. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000-09-01 2020-12-10T18:00:32Z 2020-12-10T18:00:32Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. Brasilia Df: Empresa Brasil Pesq Agropec, v. 35, n. 9, p. 1843-1851, 2000. 0100-204X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195698 WOS:000165260600017 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. Brasilia Df: Empresa Brasil Pesq Agropec, v. 35, n. 9, p. 1843-1851, 2000. 0100-204X WOS:000165260600017 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195698 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1843-1851 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa Brasil Pesq Agropec |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa Brasil Pesq Agropec |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546554142752768 |