‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Phuyal, Dinesh
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nogueira, Thiago Assis Rodrigues [UNESP], Jani, Arun D., Kadyampakeni, Davie M., Morgan, Kelly T., Ferrarezi, Rhuanito Soranz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15128-20
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221570
Resumo: Since the arrival of Huanglongbing (HLB) disease in Florida, several management approaches, including modification of orchard architecture design and nutritional therapy, have been explored. High-density plantings anticipate early economic returns from HLB-affected orchards. With no cure available for HLB, balanced nutrient application through soil and foliar spraying can mitigate the disease. A 2-year study was conducted to investigate the effects of three grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) planting densities [single-row (300 and 440 trees per ha), and double-row high-density (975 trees per ha)], two controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) blends, and foliar-applied micronutrients (FAM) (a blend of B, Mn, and Zn at 0, 1.5, 3, and 6 times the recommended rates) on grapefruit growth and fruit yield, physiological parameters, and foliar nutrient concentrations in an HLB-affected orchard. All the trees tested positive for HLB based on real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) test. The highest planting density resulted in the lowest trunk diameter and canopy volume. Despite lower yield per tree in 2019–20, 975 trees per ha planting induced the greatest fruit and solid yields per ha. Also, the fruit produced from 975 trees per ha planting tended to be acidic with the deposition of more soluble solids. Use of CRF with higher micronutrients increased canopy volume with the expense of reduced fruit number in 2019–20. FAM did not affect cycle threshold (Ct) value and tree growth parameters. Fruit yield, photosynthesis rate, and stomatal conductance (gS) decreased, and all leaf nutrient concentrations except B increased in 2019–20 with all FAM rates tested. In conclusion, our study showed that high-density planting optimizes yield under HLB-endemic conditions. In addition, supplemental soil and foliar micronutrient application do not enhance yield of HLB-affected trees over a 2-year timeframe, warranting further research for confirmation of results.
id UNSP_dc2d3821e3445ff1743e19eb76c20508
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221570
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient managementSince the arrival of Huanglongbing (HLB) disease in Florida, several management approaches, including modification of orchard architecture design and nutritional therapy, have been explored. High-density plantings anticipate early economic returns from HLB-affected orchards. With no cure available for HLB, balanced nutrient application through soil and foliar spraying can mitigate the disease. A 2-year study was conducted to investigate the effects of three grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) planting densities [single-row (300 and 440 trees per ha), and double-row high-density (975 trees per ha)], two controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) blends, and foliar-applied micronutrients (FAM) (a blend of B, Mn, and Zn at 0, 1.5, 3, and 6 times the recommended rates) on grapefruit growth and fruit yield, physiological parameters, and foliar nutrient concentrations in an HLB-affected orchard. All the trees tested positive for HLB based on real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) test. The highest planting density resulted in the lowest trunk diameter and canopy volume. Despite lower yield per tree in 2019–20, 975 trees per ha planting induced the greatest fruit and solid yields per ha. Also, the fruit produced from 975 trees per ha planting tended to be acidic with the deposition of more soluble solids. Use of CRF with higher micronutrients increased canopy volume with the expense of reduced fruit number in 2019–20. FAM did not affect cycle threshold (Ct) value and tree growth parameters. Fruit yield, photosynthesis rate, and stomatal conductance (gS) decreased, and all leaf nutrient concentrations except B increased in 2019–20 with all FAM rates tested. In conclusion, our study showed that high-density planting optimizes yield under HLB-endemic conditions. In addition, supplemental soil and foliar micronutrient application do not enhance yield of HLB-affected trees over a 2-year timeframe, warranting further research for confirmation of results.University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Indian River Research and Education Center, 2199 South Rock RoadSão Paulo State University School of Engineering Department of Plant Protection Rural Engineering and Soils, 56 Brasil Sul AvenueUniversity of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station RoadUniversity of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 State Road 29 NorthSão Paulo State University School of Engineering Department of Plant Protection Rural Engineering and Soils, 56 Brasil Sul AvenueIndian River Research and Education CenterUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Citrus Research and Education CenterSouthwest Florida Research and Education CenterPhuyal, DineshNogueira, Thiago Assis Rodrigues [UNESP]Jani, Arun D.Kadyampakeni, Davie M.Morgan, Kelly T.Ferrarezi, Rhuanito Soranz2022-04-28T19:29:24Z2022-04-28T19:29:24Z2020-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1420-1432http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15128-20HortScience, v. 55, n. 9, p. 1420-1432, 2020.2327-98340018-5345http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22157010.21273/HORTSCI15128-202-s2.0-85091573099Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengHortScienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:29:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221570Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:29:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management
title ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management
spellingShingle ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management
Phuyal, Dinesh
title_short ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management
title_full ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management
title_fullStr ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management
title_full_unstemmed ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management
title_sort ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit affected by huanglongbing II. Planting density, soil, and foliar nutrient management
author Phuyal, Dinesh
author_facet Phuyal, Dinesh
Nogueira, Thiago Assis Rodrigues [UNESP]
Jani, Arun D.
Kadyampakeni, Davie M.
Morgan, Kelly T.
Ferrarezi, Rhuanito Soranz
author_role author
author2 Nogueira, Thiago Assis Rodrigues [UNESP]
Jani, Arun D.
Kadyampakeni, Davie M.
Morgan, Kelly T.
Ferrarezi, Rhuanito Soranz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Indian River Research and Education Center
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Citrus Research and Education Center
Southwest Florida Research and Education Center
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Phuyal, Dinesh
Nogueira, Thiago Assis Rodrigues [UNESP]
Jani, Arun D.
Kadyampakeni, Davie M.
Morgan, Kelly T.
Ferrarezi, Rhuanito Soranz
description Since the arrival of Huanglongbing (HLB) disease in Florida, several management approaches, including modification of orchard architecture design and nutritional therapy, have been explored. High-density plantings anticipate early economic returns from HLB-affected orchards. With no cure available for HLB, balanced nutrient application through soil and foliar spraying can mitigate the disease. A 2-year study was conducted to investigate the effects of three grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) planting densities [single-row (300 and 440 trees per ha), and double-row high-density (975 trees per ha)], two controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) blends, and foliar-applied micronutrients (FAM) (a blend of B, Mn, and Zn at 0, 1.5, 3, and 6 times the recommended rates) on grapefruit growth and fruit yield, physiological parameters, and foliar nutrient concentrations in an HLB-affected orchard. All the trees tested positive for HLB based on real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) test. The highest planting density resulted in the lowest trunk diameter and canopy volume. Despite lower yield per tree in 2019–20, 975 trees per ha planting induced the greatest fruit and solid yields per ha. Also, the fruit produced from 975 trees per ha planting tended to be acidic with the deposition of more soluble solids. Use of CRF with higher micronutrients increased canopy volume with the expense of reduced fruit number in 2019–20. FAM did not affect cycle threshold (Ct) value and tree growth parameters. Fruit yield, photosynthesis rate, and stomatal conductance (gS) decreased, and all leaf nutrient concentrations except B increased in 2019–20 with all FAM rates tested. In conclusion, our study showed that high-density planting optimizes yield under HLB-endemic conditions. In addition, supplemental soil and foliar micronutrient application do not enhance yield of HLB-affected trees over a 2-year timeframe, warranting further research for confirmation of results.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-27
2022-04-28T19:29:24Z
2022-04-28T19:29:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15128-20
HortScience, v. 55, n. 9, p. 1420-1432, 2020.
2327-9834
0018-5345
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221570
10.21273/HORTSCI15128-20
2-s2.0-85091573099
url http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15128-20
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221570
identifier_str_mv HortScience, v. 55, n. 9, p. 1420-1432, 2020.
2327-9834
0018-5345
10.21273/HORTSCI15128-20
2-s2.0-85091573099
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv HortScience
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1420-1432
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803649413584781312