Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000600002 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163104 |
Resumo: | The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of three different intensive silvopastoral systems (ISPS) on cattle animal welfare (AW) in Colombia. The three ISPS differed in area, plant composition, and grazing periods as follows: ISPS1 - low plant diversity in paddocks of 1200 m(2), with grazing period of 24 h; ISPS2 - middle plant diversity in paddocks of 600 m(2), with grazing period of 12 h; and ISPS3 - high plant diversity in paddocks of 600 m(2), with grazing period of 24 h. Animal welfare was assessed using a wide range of criteria, which were integrated using L-spline functions and Choquet integrals to generate overall values. It was found that AW was good in all ISPS; the highest scoring criteria was for food and water, with 99, 97, and 100 points from a maximum of 100 for ISPSs 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Comfort showed values of 100 for all three systems, but good health was the most problematic criteria of the AW features with scores of 25, 40, and 36 for ISPSs 1, 2, and 3, respectively. All three ISPS showed excellent scores for appropriate behavior (82, 88, and 89). The welfare problems shown here were not specific to the individual ISPS, but were common to all livestock systems in the region. Despite the differences in diversity of plants, size of paddocks, and grazing period among the three ISPSs tested, all of them provide cattle with sufficient resources and a diverse environment, ensuring a good state of welfare to them. |
id |
UNSP_dd3c641cb2fb27ddf280d6aa08aa6b53 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163104 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case reportanimal emotionanimal welfareappropriate behaviorlivestocksustainabilityThe objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of three different intensive silvopastoral systems (ISPS) on cattle animal welfare (AW) in Colombia. The three ISPS differed in area, plant composition, and grazing periods as follows: ISPS1 - low plant diversity in paddocks of 1200 m(2), with grazing period of 24 h; ISPS2 - middle plant diversity in paddocks of 600 m(2), with grazing period of 12 h; and ISPS3 - high plant diversity in paddocks of 600 m(2), with grazing period of 24 h. Animal welfare was assessed using a wide range of criteria, which were integrated using L-spline functions and Choquet integrals to generate overall values. It was found that AW was good in all ISPS; the highest scoring criteria was for food and water, with 99, 97, and 100 points from a maximum of 100 for ISPSs 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Comfort showed values of 100 for all three systems, but good health was the most problematic criteria of the AW features with scores of 25, 40, and 36 for ISPSs 1, 2, and 3, respectively. All three ISPS showed excellent scores for appropriate behavior (82, 88, and 89). The welfare problems shown here were not specific to the individual ISPS, but were common to all livestock systems in the region. Despite the differences in diversity of plants, size of paddocks, and grazing period among the three ISPSs tested, all of them provide cattle with sufficient resources and a diverse environment, ensuring a good state of welfare to them.Sostenibilidad Universidad de AntioquiaFrancisco Jose de Caldas COLCIENCIASCIPAV foundationUniv Nacl Colombia, Fac Ciencias Agr, Dept Prod Anim, Medellin, ColombiaGrp Estudos & Pesquisas Etol & Ecol Anim, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Nacl Colombia, Fac Ciencias Agr, Dept Ciencias Agron, Medellin, ColombiaGrp Invest Prod Desarrollo & Transformac Agr, Medellin, ColombiaUniv CES, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, Grp INCA CES, Medellin, ColombiaUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zootecnia, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zootecnia, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilRevista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal SciUniv Nacl ColombiaGrp Estudos & Pesquisas Etol & Ecol AnimUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Grp Invest Prod Desarrollo & Transformac AgrUniv CESTarazona Morales, Ariel MarcelCeballos, Maria Camila [UNESP]Correa Londono, GuillermoCuartas Cardona, Cesar AugustoNaranjo Ramirez, Juan FernandoRodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:40:08Z2018-11-26T17:40:08Z2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article478-488application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000600002Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Science. Vicosa-mg: Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci, v. 46, n. 6, p. 478-488, 2017.1806-9290http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16310410.1590/S1806-92902017000600002S1516-35982017000600478WOS:000407015800002S1516-35982017000600478.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:42:06Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163104Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:25:20.441222Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report |
title |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report |
spellingShingle |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report Tarazona Morales, Ariel Marcel animal emotion animal welfare appropriate behavior livestock sustainability |
title_short |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report |
title_full |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report |
title_fullStr |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report |
title_full_unstemmed |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report |
title_sort |
Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: A case report |
author |
Tarazona Morales, Ariel Marcel |
author_facet |
Tarazona Morales, Ariel Marcel Ceballos, Maria Camila [UNESP] Correa Londono, Guillermo Cuartas Cardona, Cesar Augusto Naranjo Ramirez, Juan Fernando Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ceballos, Maria Camila [UNESP] Correa Londono, Guillermo Cuartas Cardona, Cesar Augusto Naranjo Ramirez, Juan Fernando Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Nacl Colombia Grp Estudos & Pesquisas Etol & Ecol Anim Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Grp Invest Prod Desarrollo & Transformac Agr Univ CES |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tarazona Morales, Ariel Marcel Ceballos, Maria Camila [UNESP] Correa Londono, Guillermo Cuartas Cardona, Cesar Augusto Naranjo Ramirez, Juan Fernando Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
animal emotion animal welfare appropriate behavior livestock sustainability |
topic |
animal emotion animal welfare appropriate behavior livestock sustainability |
description |
The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of three different intensive silvopastoral systems (ISPS) on cattle animal welfare (AW) in Colombia. The three ISPS differed in area, plant composition, and grazing periods as follows: ISPS1 - low plant diversity in paddocks of 1200 m(2), with grazing period of 24 h; ISPS2 - middle plant diversity in paddocks of 600 m(2), with grazing period of 12 h; and ISPS3 - high plant diversity in paddocks of 600 m(2), with grazing period of 24 h. Animal welfare was assessed using a wide range of criteria, which were integrated using L-spline functions and Choquet integrals to generate overall values. It was found that AW was good in all ISPS; the highest scoring criteria was for food and water, with 99, 97, and 100 points from a maximum of 100 for ISPSs 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Comfort showed values of 100 for all three systems, but good health was the most problematic criteria of the AW features with scores of 25, 40, and 36 for ISPSs 1, 2, and 3, respectively. All three ISPS showed excellent scores for appropriate behavior (82, 88, and 89). The welfare problems shown here were not specific to the individual ISPS, but were common to all livestock systems in the region. Despite the differences in diversity of plants, size of paddocks, and grazing period among the three ISPSs tested, all of them provide cattle with sufficient resources and a diverse environment, ensuring a good state of welfare to them. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-01 2018-11-26T17:40:08Z 2018-11-26T17:40:08Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000600002 Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Science. Vicosa-mg: Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci, v. 46, n. 6, p. 478-488, 2017. 1806-9290 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163104 10.1590/S1806-92902017000600002 S1516-35982017000600478 WOS:000407015800002 S1516-35982017000600478.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000600002 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163104 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Science. Vicosa-mg: Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci, v. 46, n. 6, p. 478-488, 2017. 1806-9290 10.1590/S1806-92902017000600002 S1516-35982017000600478 WOS:000407015800002 S1516-35982017000600478.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
478-488 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128929780727808 |