Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04914-6 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249642 |
Resumo: | Objective: The aim of this double-blind, randomized trial was to evaluate the influence of the occlusogingival distance (OGD) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill resin composite and a regular nanofilled resin composite. Materials and methods: One hundred and forty NCCLs in 77 participants were randomly divided into four groups (n = 35), according to OGD (1.5 mm ± 10% or 3 mm ± 10%) and resin composites (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior [B] or Filtek Z350 XT [C]), namely: 1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, 3 mm-B, and 3 mm-C. The restorations were bonded using a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond), applied following the manufacturer’s instructions. Restorations were polished 1 week after placement. Two experienced and calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations using modified US Public Health Service criteria at baseline (7 days) and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months. Statistical analyses were carried out using Kruskal–Wallis, Friedman’s repeated measures analysis of variance, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test (α = 0.05). Results: After 30 months, the recall rate was 94.2%. Eight restorations were lost (3 for 1.5 mm-C, 2 for 1.5 mm-B, 1 for 3 mm-C, and 2 for 3 mm-B). All groups resulted in a significantly worse marginal discoloration and surface texture at 30 months in comparison with the baseline (1 week). No significant difference was found for the other parameters. Conclusion: The restorations performed with both resin composites produced clinically acceptable restorations. The OGD of NCCLs did not influence the clinical performance of restorations. Clinical significance: The OGD of NCCLs did not have a significant effect on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill and nanofilled restorations. Both materials showed a very good performance on 30-month evaluation. |
id |
UNSP_dd9d7e77f9413ebb2468640fc9436b99 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/249642 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesionsBulk-fillComposite resinsIncremental fillingNoncarious cervical lesionsRandomized controlled trialObjective: The aim of this double-blind, randomized trial was to evaluate the influence of the occlusogingival distance (OGD) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill resin composite and a regular nanofilled resin composite. Materials and methods: One hundred and forty NCCLs in 77 participants were randomly divided into four groups (n = 35), according to OGD (1.5 mm ± 10% or 3 mm ± 10%) and resin composites (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior [B] or Filtek Z350 XT [C]), namely: 1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, 3 mm-B, and 3 mm-C. The restorations were bonded using a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond), applied following the manufacturer’s instructions. Restorations were polished 1 week after placement. Two experienced and calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations using modified US Public Health Service criteria at baseline (7 days) and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months. Statistical analyses were carried out using Kruskal–Wallis, Friedman’s repeated measures analysis of variance, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test (α = 0.05). Results: After 30 months, the recall rate was 94.2%. Eight restorations were lost (3 for 1.5 mm-C, 2 for 1.5 mm-B, 1 for 3 mm-C, and 2 for 3 mm-B). All groups resulted in a significantly worse marginal discoloration and surface texture at 30 months in comparison with the baseline (1 week). No significant difference was found for the other parameters. Conclusion: The restorations performed with both resin composites produced clinically acceptable restorations. The OGD of NCCLs did not influence the clinical performance of restorations. Clinical significance: The OGD of NCCLs did not have a significant effect on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill and nanofilled restorations. Both materials showed a very good performance on 30-month evaluation.Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University – UNESP, Av. Francisco José Longo, 777, São PauloDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University – UNESP, Av. Francisco José Longo, 777, São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Correia, Ayla Macyelle de Oliveira [UNESP]Jurema, Ana Luiza Barbosa [UNESP]Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP]Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP]2023-07-29T16:05:15Z2023-07-29T16:05:15Z2023-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04914-6Clinical Oral Investigations.1436-37711432-6981http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24964210.1007/s00784-023-04914-62-s2.0-85147753923Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinical Oral Investigationsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T16:05:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/249642Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-07-29T16:05:15Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
spellingShingle |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions Correia, Ayla Macyelle de Oliveira [UNESP] Bulk-fill Composite resins Incremental filling Noncarious cervical lesions Randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_full |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_fullStr |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
title_sort |
Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions |
author |
Correia, Ayla Macyelle de Oliveira [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Correia, Ayla Macyelle de Oliveira [UNESP] Jurema, Ana Luiza Barbosa [UNESP] Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP] Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jurema, Ana Luiza Barbosa [UNESP] Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP] Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Correia, Ayla Macyelle de Oliveira [UNESP] Jurema, Ana Luiza Barbosa [UNESP] Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP] Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bulk-fill Composite resins Incremental filling Noncarious cervical lesions Randomized controlled trial |
topic |
Bulk-fill Composite resins Incremental filling Noncarious cervical lesions Randomized controlled trial |
description |
Objective: The aim of this double-blind, randomized trial was to evaluate the influence of the occlusogingival distance (OGD) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill resin composite and a regular nanofilled resin composite. Materials and methods: One hundred and forty NCCLs in 77 participants were randomly divided into four groups (n = 35), according to OGD (1.5 mm ± 10% or 3 mm ± 10%) and resin composites (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior [B] or Filtek Z350 XT [C]), namely: 1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, 3 mm-B, and 3 mm-C. The restorations were bonded using a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond), applied following the manufacturer’s instructions. Restorations were polished 1 week after placement. Two experienced and calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations using modified US Public Health Service criteria at baseline (7 days) and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months. Statistical analyses were carried out using Kruskal–Wallis, Friedman’s repeated measures analysis of variance, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test (α = 0.05). Results: After 30 months, the recall rate was 94.2%. Eight restorations were lost (3 for 1.5 mm-C, 2 for 1.5 mm-B, 1 for 3 mm-C, and 2 for 3 mm-B). All groups resulted in a significantly worse marginal discoloration and surface texture at 30 months in comparison with the baseline (1 week). No significant difference was found for the other parameters. Conclusion: The restorations performed with both resin composites produced clinically acceptable restorations. The OGD of NCCLs did not influence the clinical performance of restorations. Clinical significance: The OGD of NCCLs did not have a significant effect on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill and nanofilled restorations. Both materials showed a very good performance on 30-month evaluation. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-29T16:05:15Z 2023-07-29T16:05:15Z 2023-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04914-6 Clinical Oral Investigations. 1436-3771 1432-6981 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249642 10.1007/s00784-023-04914-6 2-s2.0-85147753923 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04914-6 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249642 |
identifier_str_mv |
Clinical Oral Investigations. 1436-3771 1432-6981 10.1007/s00784-023-04914-6 2-s2.0-85147753923 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799964805987041280 |