Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.014 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171102 |
Resumo: | The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to compare the effect of Silver Sulfadiazine (SSD) with other new dressings, with or without silver, on healing and infection prevention in burns. The electronic search was carried out in the electronic databases of Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Lilacs and BVS. The articles included were randomized clinical trials about burn treatment with SSD, which evaluated the healing and infection of burn wounds in humans. The exclusion criteria included articles, editorials and letters published in the form of abstracts, unpublished reports and case series, cross-sectional, observational experimental studies, and the use of sulfadiazine for other types of wounds. The search identified 873 references, and 24 studies were included in accordance with the eligibility criteria. The results showed a statistically favorable difference related to the time of healing for silver dressings (p < 0.0001; MD 3.83; 95% CI 2.03–5.62) and dressings without silver (p < 0.007; MD 2.9; 95% CI 0.81–5.00) in comparison with SSD. The rate of infection showed no difference in the group treated with SSD compared with the group treated with dressings containing silver (p > 0.05). The rate of infection was significantly higher in the SSD group compared with the group treated with dressings without silver (p < 0.005; MD 25.29% and MD 12.97%). Considering the clinical trials conducted up to the present time, the authors concluded that new dressings with and without silver show better results than SSD for wound healing, and burns treated with dressings without silver are less likely to become infected than burns with SSD. No differences between SSD and new silver materials were observed in relation to infection prevention. |
id |
UNSP_dfea8cb06c79e1adcd6911440c06e8a5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/171102 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysisBurnsInfectionOcclusive dressingsSilver SulfadiazineWound healingThe aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to compare the effect of Silver Sulfadiazine (SSD) with other new dressings, with or without silver, on healing and infection prevention in burns. The electronic search was carried out in the electronic databases of Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Lilacs and BVS. The articles included were randomized clinical trials about burn treatment with SSD, which evaluated the healing and infection of burn wounds in humans. The exclusion criteria included articles, editorials and letters published in the form of abstracts, unpublished reports and case series, cross-sectional, observational experimental studies, and the use of sulfadiazine for other types of wounds. The search identified 873 references, and 24 studies were included in accordance with the eligibility criteria. The results showed a statistically favorable difference related to the time of healing for silver dressings (p < 0.0001; MD 3.83; 95% CI 2.03–5.62) and dressings without silver (p < 0.007; MD 2.9; 95% CI 0.81–5.00) in comparison with SSD. The rate of infection showed no difference in the group treated with SSD compared with the group treated with dressings containing silver (p > 0.05). The rate of infection was significantly higher in the SSD group compared with the group treated with dressings without silver (p < 0.005; MD 25.29% and MD 12.97%). Considering the clinical trials conducted up to the present time, the authors concluded that new dressings with and without silver show better results than SSD for wound healing, and burns treated with dressings without silver are less likely to become infected than burns with SSD. No differences between SSD and new silver materials were observed in relation to infection prevention.Guarulhos University Nursing Post Graduation Program, Praça Tereza Cristina, 88, CentroSão Paulo University Plastic Surgery Division, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455, Cerqueira CésarDentistry College UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio, 1193, AraçatubaDentistry College UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio, 1193, AraçatubaGraduation ProgramUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Nímia, Heloisa HelenaCarvalho, Viviane FernandesIsaac, CesarSouza, Francisley Ávila [UNESP]Gemperli, RolfPaggiaro, André Oliveira2018-12-11T16:53:54Z2018-12-11T16:53:54Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.014Burns.1879-14090305-4179http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17110210.1016/j.burns.2018.05.0142-s2.0-850484695872-s2.0-85048469587.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBurns1,044info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-03T06:19:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/171102Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:58:46.223174Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis Nímia, Heloisa Helena Burns Infection Occlusive dressings Silver Sulfadiazine Wound healing |
title_short |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Comparative study of Silver Sulfadiazine with other materials for healing and infection prevention in burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Nímia, Heloisa Helena |
author_facet |
Nímia, Heloisa Helena Carvalho, Viviane Fernandes Isaac, Cesar Souza, Francisley Ávila [UNESP] Gemperli, Rolf Paggiaro, André Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalho, Viviane Fernandes Isaac, Cesar Souza, Francisley Ávila [UNESP] Gemperli, Rolf Paggiaro, André Oliveira |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Graduation Program Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nímia, Heloisa Helena Carvalho, Viviane Fernandes Isaac, Cesar Souza, Francisley Ávila [UNESP] Gemperli, Rolf Paggiaro, André Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Burns Infection Occlusive dressings Silver Sulfadiazine Wound healing |
topic |
Burns Infection Occlusive dressings Silver Sulfadiazine Wound healing |
description |
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to compare the effect of Silver Sulfadiazine (SSD) with other new dressings, with or without silver, on healing and infection prevention in burns. The electronic search was carried out in the electronic databases of Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Lilacs and BVS. The articles included were randomized clinical trials about burn treatment with SSD, which evaluated the healing and infection of burn wounds in humans. The exclusion criteria included articles, editorials and letters published in the form of abstracts, unpublished reports and case series, cross-sectional, observational experimental studies, and the use of sulfadiazine for other types of wounds. The search identified 873 references, and 24 studies were included in accordance with the eligibility criteria. The results showed a statistically favorable difference related to the time of healing for silver dressings (p < 0.0001; MD 3.83; 95% CI 2.03–5.62) and dressings without silver (p < 0.007; MD 2.9; 95% CI 0.81–5.00) in comparison with SSD. The rate of infection showed no difference in the group treated with SSD compared with the group treated with dressings containing silver (p > 0.05). The rate of infection was significantly higher in the SSD group compared with the group treated with dressings without silver (p < 0.005; MD 25.29% and MD 12.97%). Considering the clinical trials conducted up to the present time, the authors concluded that new dressings with and without silver show better results than SSD for wound healing, and burns treated with dressings without silver are less likely to become infected than burns with SSD. No differences between SSD and new silver materials were observed in relation to infection prevention. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T16:53:54Z 2018-12-11T16:53:54Z 2018-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.014 Burns. 1879-1409 0305-4179 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171102 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.014 2-s2.0-85048469587 2-s2.0-85048469587.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.014 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171102 |
identifier_str_mv |
Burns. 1879-1409 0305-4179 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.014 2-s2.0-85048469587 2-s2.0-85048469587.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Burns 1,044 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129380430381056 |