Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP], Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP], Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP], dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP], Duque, Cristiane [UNESP], Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP], Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP], Narciso de Oliveira, Derly Tescaro, Brizzotti, Natália Seron, Gottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173125
Resumo: Statement of problem Dentists often note problems with infection in patients with maxillofacial prostheses. Conventional disinfection protocols are not always effective and may alter the properties of the polymer used in the prosthesis. Thus, the search for improved disinfection methods is important. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of conventional disinfectant solutions (water and neutral soap and 4% chlorhexidine) and plant extracts (Cymbopogon nardus and Hydrastis canadensis) on specimens of maxillofacial silicone contaminated with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Material and methods Seventy-two silicone (MDX4-4210) specimens were fabricated (5×2 mm) and sterilized. Thirty-six were contaminated with C albicans (106 cells/mL) and 36 with S aureus (108 cells/mL) to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the cleaning protocols. After incubation (37°C/72 hours), the specimens were divided into 5 groups: not disinfected (positive control), soaking in saline solution for 10 minutes, soaking in 4% chlorhexidine for 10 minutes, soaking in C nardus for 10 minutes, soaking in H canadensis for 10 minutes, and washing by hand with water and neutral soap for 30 seconds. The viability of cells was evaluated by XTT (2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay and by scanning electron microscope analysis. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). Results All disinfection solutions provided a statistically significant reduction in biofilm viability compared with the control group for both microorganisms (P<.05). Washing with water and neutral soap was significantly more effective in reducing biofilm viability than immersion in the disinfection solutions, with persistence of viable microorganisms between 1.05% for C albicans and 0.62% for S aureus after this cleaning protocol. Photomicrographs revealed that 4% chlorhexidine altered the surface of the polymer. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that the cleaning protocols with different disinfectant solutions produced a significant reduction in the viability of C albicans and S aureus biofilms on the silicone polymer. Washing with water and neutral soap was the most effective protocol against both microorganisms.
id UNSP_e01aceb42626bdaccdc4538c0abb8bac
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/173125
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surfaceStatement of problem Dentists often note problems with infection in patients with maxillofacial prostheses. Conventional disinfection protocols are not always effective and may alter the properties of the polymer used in the prosthesis. Thus, the search for improved disinfection methods is important. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of conventional disinfectant solutions (water and neutral soap and 4% chlorhexidine) and plant extracts (Cymbopogon nardus and Hydrastis canadensis) on specimens of maxillofacial silicone contaminated with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Material and methods Seventy-two silicone (MDX4-4210) specimens were fabricated (5×2 mm) and sterilized. Thirty-six were contaminated with C albicans (106 cells/mL) and 36 with S aureus (108 cells/mL) to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the cleaning protocols. After incubation (37°C/72 hours), the specimens were divided into 5 groups: not disinfected (positive control), soaking in saline solution for 10 minutes, soaking in 4% chlorhexidine for 10 minutes, soaking in C nardus for 10 minutes, soaking in H canadensis for 10 minutes, and washing by hand with water and neutral soap for 30 seconds. The viability of cells was evaluated by XTT (2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay and by scanning electron microscope analysis. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). Results All disinfection solutions provided a statistically significant reduction in biofilm viability compared with the control group for both microorganisms (P<.05). Washing with water and neutral soap was significantly more effective in reducing biofilm viability than immersion in the disinfection solutions, with persistence of viable microorganisms between 1.05% for C albicans and 0.62% for S aureus after this cleaning protocol. Photomicrographs revealed that 4% chlorhexidine altered the surface of the polymer. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that the cleaning protocols with different disinfectant solutions produced a significant reduction in the viability of C albicans and S aureus biofilms on the silicone polymer. Washing with water and neutral soap was the most effective protocol against both microorganisms.Assistant Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Graduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Titular Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Pediatric and Public Health Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP), AraçatubaDoctoral student Department of Pediatric and Public Health Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Doctoral student Department of Dermatologic Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)Biologist Department of Dermatologic Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)Professor Department of Dermatologic Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)Assistant Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Graduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Titular Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Pediatric and Public Health Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP), AraçatubaDoctoral student Department of Pediatric and Public Health Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP]Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP]Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP]Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP]Narciso de Oliveira, Derly TescaroBrizzotti, Natália SeronGottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa2018-12-11T17:03:45Z2018-12-11T17:03:45Z2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article136-143application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 116, n. 1, p. 136-143, 2016.0022-3913http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17312510.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.0142-s2.0-849757846322-s2.0-84975784632.pdf971988381487258256518745094936170000-0002-2575-279XScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry1,087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T14:52:07Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/173125Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T14:52:07Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
title Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
spellingShingle Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP]
title_short Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
title_full Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
title_fullStr Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
title_sort Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
author Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP]
author_facet Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP]
Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP]
Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]
Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP]
Narciso de Oliveira, Derly Tescaro
Brizzotti, Natália Seron
Gottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa
author_role author
author2 Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP]
Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]
Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP]
Narciso de Oliveira, Derly Tescaro
Brizzotti, Natália Seron
Gottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP]
Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP]
Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]
Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP]
Narciso de Oliveira, Derly Tescaro
Brizzotti, Natália Seron
Gottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa
description Statement of problem Dentists often note problems with infection in patients with maxillofacial prostheses. Conventional disinfection protocols are not always effective and may alter the properties of the polymer used in the prosthesis. Thus, the search for improved disinfection methods is important. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of conventional disinfectant solutions (water and neutral soap and 4% chlorhexidine) and plant extracts (Cymbopogon nardus and Hydrastis canadensis) on specimens of maxillofacial silicone contaminated with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Material and methods Seventy-two silicone (MDX4-4210) specimens were fabricated (5×2 mm) and sterilized. Thirty-six were contaminated with C albicans (106 cells/mL) and 36 with S aureus (108 cells/mL) to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the cleaning protocols. After incubation (37°C/72 hours), the specimens were divided into 5 groups: not disinfected (positive control), soaking in saline solution for 10 minutes, soaking in 4% chlorhexidine for 10 minutes, soaking in C nardus for 10 minutes, soaking in H canadensis for 10 minutes, and washing by hand with water and neutral soap for 30 seconds. The viability of cells was evaluated by XTT (2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay and by scanning electron microscope analysis. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). Results All disinfection solutions provided a statistically significant reduction in biofilm viability compared with the control group for both microorganisms (P<.05). Washing with water and neutral soap was significantly more effective in reducing biofilm viability than immersion in the disinfection solutions, with persistence of viable microorganisms between 1.05% for C albicans and 0.62% for S aureus after this cleaning protocol. Photomicrographs revealed that 4% chlorhexidine altered the surface of the polymer. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that the cleaning protocols with different disinfectant solutions produced a significant reduction in the viability of C albicans and S aureus biofilms on the silicone polymer. Washing with water and neutral soap was the most effective protocol against both microorganisms.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01
2018-12-11T17:03:45Z
2018-12-11T17:03:45Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 116, n. 1, p. 136-143, 2016.
0022-3913
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173125
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014
2-s2.0-84975784632
2-s2.0-84975784632.pdf
9719883814872582
5651874509493617
0000-0002-2575-279X
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173125
identifier_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 116, n. 1, p. 136-143, 2016.
0022-3913
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014
2-s2.0-84975784632
2-s2.0-84975784632.pdf
9719883814872582
5651874509493617
0000-0002-2575-279X
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
1,087
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 136-143
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546518555131904