Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173125 |
Resumo: | Statement of problem Dentists often note problems with infection in patients with maxillofacial prostheses. Conventional disinfection protocols are not always effective and may alter the properties of the polymer used in the prosthesis. Thus, the search for improved disinfection methods is important. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of conventional disinfectant solutions (water and neutral soap and 4% chlorhexidine) and plant extracts (Cymbopogon nardus and Hydrastis canadensis) on specimens of maxillofacial silicone contaminated with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Material and methods Seventy-two silicone (MDX4-4210) specimens were fabricated (5×2 mm) and sterilized. Thirty-six were contaminated with C albicans (106 cells/mL) and 36 with S aureus (108 cells/mL) to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the cleaning protocols. After incubation (37°C/72 hours), the specimens were divided into 5 groups: not disinfected (positive control), soaking in saline solution for 10 minutes, soaking in 4% chlorhexidine for 10 minutes, soaking in C nardus for 10 minutes, soaking in H canadensis for 10 minutes, and washing by hand with water and neutral soap for 30 seconds. The viability of cells was evaluated by XTT (2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay and by scanning electron microscope analysis. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). Results All disinfection solutions provided a statistically significant reduction in biofilm viability compared with the control group for both microorganisms (P<.05). Washing with water and neutral soap was significantly more effective in reducing biofilm viability than immersion in the disinfection solutions, with persistence of viable microorganisms between 1.05% for C albicans and 0.62% for S aureus after this cleaning protocol. Photomicrographs revealed that 4% chlorhexidine altered the surface of the polymer. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that the cleaning protocols with different disinfectant solutions produced a significant reduction in the viability of C albicans and S aureus biofilms on the silicone polymer. Washing with water and neutral soap was the most effective protocol against both microorganisms. |
id |
UNSP_e01aceb42626bdaccdc4538c0abb8bac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/173125 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surfaceStatement of problem Dentists often note problems with infection in patients with maxillofacial prostheses. Conventional disinfection protocols are not always effective and may alter the properties of the polymer used in the prosthesis. Thus, the search for improved disinfection methods is important. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of conventional disinfectant solutions (water and neutral soap and 4% chlorhexidine) and plant extracts (Cymbopogon nardus and Hydrastis canadensis) on specimens of maxillofacial silicone contaminated with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Material and methods Seventy-two silicone (MDX4-4210) specimens were fabricated (5×2 mm) and sterilized. Thirty-six were contaminated with C albicans (106 cells/mL) and 36 with S aureus (108 cells/mL) to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the cleaning protocols. After incubation (37°C/72 hours), the specimens were divided into 5 groups: not disinfected (positive control), soaking in saline solution for 10 minutes, soaking in 4% chlorhexidine for 10 minutes, soaking in C nardus for 10 minutes, soaking in H canadensis for 10 minutes, and washing by hand with water and neutral soap for 30 seconds. The viability of cells was evaluated by XTT (2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay and by scanning electron microscope analysis. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). Results All disinfection solutions provided a statistically significant reduction in biofilm viability compared with the control group for both microorganisms (P<.05). Washing with water and neutral soap was significantly more effective in reducing biofilm viability than immersion in the disinfection solutions, with persistence of viable microorganisms between 1.05% for C albicans and 0.62% for S aureus after this cleaning protocol. Photomicrographs revealed that 4% chlorhexidine altered the surface of the polymer. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that the cleaning protocols with different disinfectant solutions produced a significant reduction in the viability of C albicans and S aureus biofilms on the silicone polymer. Washing with water and neutral soap was the most effective protocol against both microorganisms.Assistant Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Graduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Titular Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Pediatric and Public Health Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP), AraçatubaDoctoral student Department of Pediatric and Public Health Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Doctoral student Department of Dermatologic Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)Biologist Department of Dermatologic Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)Professor Department of Dermatologic Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)Assistant Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Graduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Titular Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Pediatric and Public Health Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP), AraçatubaDoctoral student Department of Pediatric and Public Health Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP)Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP]Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP]Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP]Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP]Narciso de Oliveira, Derly TescaroBrizzotti, Natália SeronGottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa2018-12-11T17:03:45Z2018-12-11T17:03:45Z2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article136-143application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 116, n. 1, p. 136-143, 2016.0022-3913http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17312510.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.0142-s2.0-849757846322-s2.0-84975784632.pdf971988381487258256518745094936170000-0002-2575-279XScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry1,087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T14:52:07Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/173125Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T14:52:07Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface |
title |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface |
spellingShingle |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP] |
title_short |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface |
title_full |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface |
title_fullStr |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface |
title_sort |
Antimicrobial activity of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on microbial biofilms on a maxillofacial polymer surface |
author |
Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP] Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP] Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP] Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] Duque, Cristiane [UNESP] Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP] Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP] Narciso de Oliveira, Derly Tescaro Brizzotti, Natália Seron Gottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP] Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP] Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] Duque, Cristiane [UNESP] Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP] Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP] Narciso de Oliveira, Derly Tescaro Brizzotti, Natália Seron Gottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Medical School of São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guiotti, Aimée Maria [UNESP] Cunha, Bruno Guandalini [UNESP] Paulini, Marcela Borghi [UNESP] Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] Duque, Cristiane [UNESP] Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP] Brandini, Daniela Atili [UNESP] Narciso de Oliveira, Derly Tescaro Brizzotti, Natália Seron Gottardo de Almeida, Margarete Teresa |
description |
Statement of problem Dentists often note problems with infection in patients with maxillofacial prostheses. Conventional disinfection protocols are not always effective and may alter the properties of the polymer used in the prosthesis. Thus, the search for improved disinfection methods is important. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of conventional disinfectant solutions (water and neutral soap and 4% chlorhexidine) and plant extracts (Cymbopogon nardus and Hydrastis canadensis) on specimens of maxillofacial silicone contaminated with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Material and methods Seventy-two silicone (MDX4-4210) specimens were fabricated (5×2 mm) and sterilized. Thirty-six were contaminated with C albicans (106 cells/mL) and 36 with S aureus (108 cells/mL) to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the cleaning protocols. After incubation (37°C/72 hours), the specimens were divided into 5 groups: not disinfected (positive control), soaking in saline solution for 10 minutes, soaking in 4% chlorhexidine for 10 minutes, soaking in C nardus for 10 minutes, soaking in H canadensis for 10 minutes, and washing by hand with water and neutral soap for 30 seconds. The viability of cells was evaluated by XTT (2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay and by scanning electron microscope analysis. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). Results All disinfection solutions provided a statistically significant reduction in biofilm viability compared with the control group for both microorganisms (P<.05). Washing with water and neutral soap was significantly more effective in reducing biofilm viability than immersion in the disinfection solutions, with persistence of viable microorganisms between 1.05% for C albicans and 0.62% for S aureus after this cleaning protocol. Photomicrographs revealed that 4% chlorhexidine altered the surface of the polymer. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that the cleaning protocols with different disinfectant solutions produced a significant reduction in the viability of C albicans and S aureus biofilms on the silicone polymer. Washing with water and neutral soap was the most effective protocol against both microorganisms. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-01 2018-12-11T17:03:45Z 2018-12-11T17:03:45Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014 Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 116, n. 1, p. 136-143, 2016. 0022-3913 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173125 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014 2-s2.0-84975784632 2-s2.0-84975784632.pdf 9719883814872582 5651874509493617 0000-0002-2575-279X |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173125 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 116, n. 1, p. 136-143, 2016. 0022-3913 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014 2-s2.0-84975784632 2-s2.0-84975784632.pdf 9719883814872582 5651874509493617 0000-0002-2575-279X |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1,087 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
136-143 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546518555131904 |