Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205286 |
Resumo: | Background: Lettuce-production areas in Brazil are frequently infested by pigweed plants, which can interfere with production by competing for resources or releasing allelopathic compounds in the environment. Objective: The present study evaluated the effect of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) density and distribution on lettuce crop (Lactuca sativa L.). Methods: The cultivars Lídia, Verônica, Lucy Brown and Salad Bowl were used. After transplanting, these plants coexisted until harvest with four pigweed plants (equivalent to 16 plants m-2) located within or outside planting rows, or with one pigweed plant located at the center of the plot (4 plants m-2), as well as a control without weed. The experiment was conducted in an open and semi-controlled area, with treatments arranged in a 4x4 factorial scheme, in a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates. Evaluations included: the number of leaves, fresh matter (lettuce only), height, leaf area and dry matter of lettuce and redroot pigweed plants. Results: The coexistence with redroot pigweed caused yield losses of up to 45% for cultivar Lídia; 41% for Salad Bowl; 33% for Verônica; and 28% for Lucy Brown. Conclusions: The density of 16 plants m-2 of redroot pigweed was the one that most negatively affected the growth of the cultivars, in which the positioning in the planting lines resulted in greater interference to the crop growth. Among the cultivars tested, Lucy Brown showed greater tolerance to coexistence with redroot pigweed plants, while the cultivar Lídia was the most sensitive to the imposed interference. |
id |
UNSP_e05cc47acc0a8224c725fa4dd9163c7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205286 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce cropAmaranthus retroflexusCompetitionDensityDistributionLactuca sativa L.WeedsBackground: Lettuce-production areas in Brazil are frequently infested by pigweed plants, which can interfere with production by competing for resources or releasing allelopathic compounds in the environment. Objective: The present study evaluated the effect of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) density and distribution on lettuce crop (Lactuca sativa L.). Methods: The cultivars Lídia, Verônica, Lucy Brown and Salad Bowl were used. After transplanting, these plants coexisted until harvest with four pigweed plants (equivalent to 16 plants m-2) located within or outside planting rows, or with one pigweed plant located at the center of the plot (4 plants m-2), as well as a control without weed. The experiment was conducted in an open and semi-controlled area, with treatments arranged in a 4x4 factorial scheme, in a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates. Evaluations included: the number of leaves, fresh matter (lettuce only), height, leaf area and dry matter of lettuce and redroot pigweed plants. Results: The coexistence with redroot pigweed caused yield losses of up to 45% for cultivar Lídia; 41% for Salad Bowl; 33% for Verônica; and 28% for Lucy Brown. Conclusions: The density of 16 plants m-2 of redroot pigweed was the one that most negatively affected the growth of the cultivars, in which the positioning in the planting lines resulted in greater interference to the crop growth. Among the cultivars tested, Lucy Brown showed greater tolerance to coexistence with redroot pigweed plants, while the cultivar Lídia was the most sensitive to the imposed interference.Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP/FCAVUniversity of Georgia – UGA Athens-EUAUniversidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP/FCAVUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Athens-EUACasadei, Eloisa [UNESP]Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP]Rodrigues, Juliana S.Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP]Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP]Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:12:53Z2021-06-25T10:12:53Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-8application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058Planta Daninha, v. 38, p. 1-8.0100-8358http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20528610.1590/S0100-83582020380100058S0100-835820200001003082-s2.0-85092396024S0100-83582020000100308.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlanta Daninhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-08T06:11:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205286Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:09:45.978532Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop |
title |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop |
spellingShingle |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP] Amaranthus retroflexus Competition Density Distribution Lactuca sativa L. Weeds |
title_short |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop |
title_full |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop |
title_fullStr |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop |
title_full_unstemmed |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop |
title_sort |
Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop |
author |
Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP] Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP] Rodrigues, Juliana S. Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP] Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP] Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP] Rodrigues, Juliana S. Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP] Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP] Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Athens-EUA |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP] Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP] Rodrigues, Juliana S. Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP] Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP] Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Amaranthus retroflexus Competition Density Distribution Lactuca sativa L. Weeds |
topic |
Amaranthus retroflexus Competition Density Distribution Lactuca sativa L. Weeds |
description |
Background: Lettuce-production areas in Brazil are frequently infested by pigweed plants, which can interfere with production by competing for resources or releasing allelopathic compounds in the environment. Objective: The present study evaluated the effect of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) density and distribution on lettuce crop (Lactuca sativa L.). Methods: The cultivars Lídia, Verônica, Lucy Brown and Salad Bowl were used. After transplanting, these plants coexisted until harvest with four pigweed plants (equivalent to 16 plants m-2) located within or outside planting rows, or with one pigweed plant located at the center of the plot (4 plants m-2), as well as a control without weed. The experiment was conducted in an open and semi-controlled area, with treatments arranged in a 4x4 factorial scheme, in a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates. Evaluations included: the number of leaves, fresh matter (lettuce only), height, leaf area and dry matter of lettuce and redroot pigweed plants. Results: The coexistence with redroot pigweed caused yield losses of up to 45% for cultivar Lídia; 41% for Salad Bowl; 33% for Verônica; and 28% for Lucy Brown. Conclusions: The density of 16 plants m-2 of redroot pigweed was the one that most negatively affected the growth of the cultivars, in which the positioning in the planting lines resulted in greater interference to the crop growth. Among the cultivars tested, Lucy Brown showed greater tolerance to coexistence with redroot pigweed plants, while the cultivar Lídia was the most sensitive to the imposed interference. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 2021-06-25T10:12:53Z 2021-06-25T10:12:53Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058 Planta Daninha, v. 38, p. 1-8. 0100-8358 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205286 10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058 S0100-83582020000100308 2-s2.0-85092396024 S0100-83582020000100308.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205286 |
identifier_str_mv |
Planta Daninha, v. 38, p. 1-8. 0100-8358 10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058 S0100-83582020000100308 2-s2.0-85092396024 S0100-83582020000100308.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Planta Daninha |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1-8 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128764772614144 |