Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP], Rodrigues, Juliana S., Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP], Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP], Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205286
Resumo: Background: Lettuce-production areas in Brazil are frequently infested by pigweed plants, which can interfere with production by competing for resources or releasing allelopathic compounds in the environment. Objective: The present study evaluated the effect of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) density and distribution on lettuce crop (Lactuca sativa L.). Methods: The cultivars Lídia, Verônica, Lucy Brown and Salad Bowl were used. After transplanting, these plants coexisted until harvest with four pigweed plants (equivalent to 16 plants m-2) located within or outside planting rows, or with one pigweed plant located at the center of the plot (4 plants m-2), as well as a control without weed. The experiment was conducted in an open and semi-controlled area, with treatments arranged in a 4x4 factorial scheme, in a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates. Evaluations included: the number of leaves, fresh matter (lettuce only), height, leaf area and dry matter of lettuce and redroot pigweed plants. Results: The coexistence with redroot pigweed caused yield losses of up to 45% for cultivar Lídia; 41% for Salad Bowl; 33% for Verônica; and 28% for Lucy Brown. Conclusions: The density of 16 plants m-2 of redroot pigweed was the one that most negatively affected the growth of the cultivars, in which the positioning in the planting lines resulted in greater interference to the crop growth. Among the cultivars tested, Lucy Brown showed greater tolerance to coexistence with redroot pigweed plants, while the cultivar Lídia was the most sensitive to the imposed interference.
id UNSP_e05cc47acc0a8224c725fa4dd9163c7c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205286
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce cropAmaranthus retroflexusCompetitionDensityDistributionLactuca sativa L.WeedsBackground: Lettuce-production areas in Brazil are frequently infested by pigweed plants, which can interfere with production by competing for resources or releasing allelopathic compounds in the environment. Objective: The present study evaluated the effect of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) density and distribution on lettuce crop (Lactuca sativa L.). Methods: The cultivars Lídia, Verônica, Lucy Brown and Salad Bowl were used. After transplanting, these plants coexisted until harvest with four pigweed plants (equivalent to 16 plants m-2) located within or outside planting rows, or with one pigweed plant located at the center of the plot (4 plants m-2), as well as a control without weed. The experiment was conducted in an open and semi-controlled area, with treatments arranged in a 4x4 factorial scheme, in a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates. Evaluations included: the number of leaves, fresh matter (lettuce only), height, leaf area and dry matter of lettuce and redroot pigweed plants. Results: The coexistence with redroot pigweed caused yield losses of up to 45% for cultivar Lídia; 41% for Salad Bowl; 33% for Verônica; and 28% for Lucy Brown. Conclusions: The density of 16 plants m-2 of redroot pigweed was the one that most negatively affected the growth of the cultivars, in which the positioning in the planting lines resulted in greater interference to the crop growth. Among the cultivars tested, Lucy Brown showed greater tolerance to coexistence with redroot pigweed plants, while the cultivar Lídia was the most sensitive to the imposed interference.Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP/FCAVUniversity of Georgia – UGA Athens-EUAUniversidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP/FCAVUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Athens-EUACasadei, Eloisa [UNESP]Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP]Rodrigues, Juliana S.Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP]Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP]Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:12:53Z2021-06-25T10:12:53Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-8application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058Planta Daninha, v. 38, p. 1-8.0100-8358http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20528610.1590/S0100-83582020380100058S0100-835820200001003082-s2.0-85092396024S0100-83582020000100308.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlanta Daninhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-08T06:11:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205286Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:09:45.978532Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
title Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
spellingShingle Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP]
Amaranthus retroflexus
Competition
Density
Distribution
Lactuca sativa L.
Weeds
title_short Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
title_full Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
title_fullStr Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
title_full_unstemmed Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
title_sort Redroot pigweed interference with lettuce crop
author Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP]
author_facet Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP]
Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Juliana S.
Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP]
Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP]
Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Juliana S.
Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP]
Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP]
Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Athens-EUA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Casadei, Eloisa [UNESP]
Bacha, Allan L. [UNESP]
Rodrigues, Juliana S.
Santos, Renata T. S. [UNESP]
Alves, Pedro L. C. A. [UNESP]
Filho, Arthur B. C. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Amaranthus retroflexus
Competition
Density
Distribution
Lactuca sativa L.
Weeds
topic Amaranthus retroflexus
Competition
Density
Distribution
Lactuca sativa L.
Weeds
description Background: Lettuce-production areas in Brazil are frequently infested by pigweed plants, which can interfere with production by competing for resources or releasing allelopathic compounds in the environment. Objective: The present study evaluated the effect of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) density and distribution on lettuce crop (Lactuca sativa L.). Methods: The cultivars Lídia, Verônica, Lucy Brown and Salad Bowl were used. After transplanting, these plants coexisted until harvest with four pigweed plants (equivalent to 16 plants m-2) located within or outside planting rows, or with one pigweed plant located at the center of the plot (4 plants m-2), as well as a control without weed. The experiment was conducted in an open and semi-controlled area, with treatments arranged in a 4x4 factorial scheme, in a completely randomized experimental design with three replicates. Evaluations included: the number of leaves, fresh matter (lettuce only), height, leaf area and dry matter of lettuce and redroot pigweed plants. Results: The coexistence with redroot pigweed caused yield losses of up to 45% for cultivar Lídia; 41% for Salad Bowl; 33% for Verônica; and 28% for Lucy Brown. Conclusions: The density of 16 plants m-2 of redroot pigweed was the one that most negatively affected the growth of the cultivars, in which the positioning in the planting lines resulted in greater interference to the crop growth. Among the cultivars tested, Lucy Brown showed greater tolerance to coexistence with redroot pigweed plants, while the cultivar Lídia was the most sensitive to the imposed interference.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
2021-06-25T10:12:53Z
2021-06-25T10:12:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058
Planta Daninha, v. 38, p. 1-8.
0100-8358
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205286
10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058
S0100-83582020000100308
2-s2.0-85092396024
S0100-83582020000100308.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205286
identifier_str_mv Planta Daninha, v. 38, p. 1-8.
0100-8358
10.1590/S0100-83582020380100058
S0100-83582020000100308
2-s2.0-85092396024
S0100-83582020000100308.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1-8
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128764772614144