Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2158724 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68764 |
Resumo: | General relativity and quantum mechanics are not consistent with each other. This conflict stems from the very fundamental principles on which these theories are grounded. General relativity, on one hand, is based on the equivalence principle, whose strong version establishes the local equivalence between gravitation and inertia. Quantum mechanics, on the other hand, is fundamentally based on the uncertainty principle, which is essentially nonlocal. This difference precludes the existence of a quantum version of the strong equivalence principle, and consequently of a quantum version of general relativity. Furthermore, there are compelling experimental evidences that a quantum object in the presence of a gravitational field violates the weak equivalence principle. Now it so happens that, in addition to general relativity, gravitation has an alternative, though equivalent, description, given by teleparallel gravity, a gauge theory for the translation group. In this theory torsion, instead of curvature, is assumed to represent the gravitational field. These two descriptions lead to the same classical results, but are conceptually different. In general relativity, curvature geometrizes the interaction while torsion, in teleparallel gravity, acts as a force, similar to the Lorentz force of electrodynamics. Because of this peculiar property, teleparallel gravity describes the gravitational interaction without requiring any of the equivalence principle versions. The replacement of general relativity by teleparallel gravity may, in consequence, lead to a conceptual reconciliation of gravitation with quantum mechanics. © 2006 American Institute of Physics. |
id |
UNSP_e1af4dcec6dccaf5e3970962d494b610 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/68764 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable?GravitationQuantum mechanicsTeleparallel gravityGeneral relativity and quantum mechanics are not consistent with each other. This conflict stems from the very fundamental principles on which these theories are grounded. General relativity, on one hand, is based on the equivalence principle, whose strong version establishes the local equivalence between gravitation and inertia. Quantum mechanics, on the other hand, is fundamentally based on the uncertainty principle, which is essentially nonlocal. This difference precludes the existence of a quantum version of the strong equivalence principle, and consequently of a quantum version of general relativity. Furthermore, there are compelling experimental evidences that a quantum object in the presence of a gravitational field violates the weak equivalence principle. Now it so happens that, in addition to general relativity, gravitation has an alternative, though equivalent, description, given by teleparallel gravity, a gauge theory for the translation group. In this theory torsion, instead of curvature, is assumed to represent the gravitational field. These two descriptions lead to the same classical results, but are conceptually different. In general relativity, curvature geometrizes the interaction while torsion, in teleparallel gravity, acts as a force, similar to the Lorentz force of electrodynamics. Because of this peculiar property, teleparallel gravity describes the gravitational interaction without requiring any of the equivalence principle versions. The replacement of general relativity by teleparallel gravity may, in consequence, lead to a conceptual reconciliation of gravitation with quantum mechanics. © 2006 American Institute of Physics.Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Pamplona 145, 01405-900 São PauloInstituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Pamplona 145, 01405-900 São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Aldrovandi, R. [UNESP]Pereira, J. G. [UNESP]Vu, K. H. [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:21:48Z2014-05-27T11:21:48Z2006-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject217-228application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2158724AIP Conference Proceedings, v. 810, p. 217-228.0094-243X1551-7616http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6876410.1063/1.2158724WOS:0002353523000182-s2.0-337512073692-s2.0-33751207369.pdf1599966126072450Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAIP Conference Proceedingsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-15T06:19:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/68764Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:01:32.358345Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable? |
title |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable? |
spellingShingle |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable? Aldrovandi, R. [UNESP] Gravitation Quantum mechanics Teleparallel gravity |
title_short |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable? |
title_full |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable? |
title_fullStr |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable? |
title_sort |
Gravity and the quantum: Are they reconcilable? |
author |
Aldrovandi, R. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Aldrovandi, R. [UNESP] Pereira, J. G. [UNESP] Vu, K. H. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, J. G. [UNESP] Vu, K. H. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aldrovandi, R. [UNESP] Pereira, J. G. [UNESP] Vu, K. H. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gravitation Quantum mechanics Teleparallel gravity |
topic |
Gravitation Quantum mechanics Teleparallel gravity |
description |
General relativity and quantum mechanics are not consistent with each other. This conflict stems from the very fundamental principles on which these theories are grounded. General relativity, on one hand, is based on the equivalence principle, whose strong version establishes the local equivalence between gravitation and inertia. Quantum mechanics, on the other hand, is fundamentally based on the uncertainty principle, which is essentially nonlocal. This difference precludes the existence of a quantum version of the strong equivalence principle, and consequently of a quantum version of general relativity. Furthermore, there are compelling experimental evidences that a quantum object in the presence of a gravitational field violates the weak equivalence principle. Now it so happens that, in addition to general relativity, gravitation has an alternative, though equivalent, description, given by teleparallel gravity, a gauge theory for the translation group. In this theory torsion, instead of curvature, is assumed to represent the gravitational field. These two descriptions lead to the same classical results, but are conceptually different. In general relativity, curvature geometrizes the interaction while torsion, in teleparallel gravity, acts as a force, similar to the Lorentz force of electrodynamics. Because of this peculiar property, teleparallel gravity describes the gravitational interaction without requiring any of the equivalence principle versions. The replacement of general relativity by teleparallel gravity may, in consequence, lead to a conceptual reconciliation of gravitation with quantum mechanics. © 2006 American Institute of Physics. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-01-04 2014-05-27T11:21:48Z 2014-05-27T11:21:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2158724 AIP Conference Proceedings, v. 810, p. 217-228. 0094-243X 1551-7616 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68764 10.1063/1.2158724 WOS:000235352300018 2-s2.0-33751207369 2-s2.0-33751207369.pdf 1599966126072450 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2158724 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68764 |
identifier_str_mv |
AIP Conference Proceedings, v. 810, p. 217-228. 0094-243X 1551-7616 10.1063/1.2158724 WOS:000235352300018 2-s2.0-33751207369 2-s2.0-33751207369.pdf 1599966126072450 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
AIP Conference Proceedings |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
217-228 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129483652202496 |