Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Villefort, Regina F.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Anami, Lilian C. [UNESP], Campos, Tiago M. B., Melo, Renata M. [UNESP], Valandro, Luiz F., von Zeidler, Sandra L. V., Bottino, Marco A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings11060719
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221867
Resumo: This study evaluated the influence of conventional and alternative surface treatments on wettability and the bond strength between polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and veneering resin. PEEK samples were randomly divided into five groups: sandblasting, tribochemical silica coating, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s, and tribochemical silica coating plus heated silane. One of them was subjected to analysis by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and ten were analyzed by goniometry (n = 5) and scanning electron microscopy (n = 5). Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested, and failure types were assessed. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey and Duncan tests (all, α = 5%). Treatment with sandblasting and silica coating had the lowest SBS means (4.2 MPa and 4.4 MPa respectively), while sulfuric acid for 5 s showed the highest mean value (12.6 MPa), followed by sulfuric acid for 30 s and tribochemical + heated silane. All failures were classified as adhesive. The lowest mean contact angle was found for the polished (control) and etched group with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s (83.9◦ ). Etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s increased the SBS between resin and PEEK.
id UNSP_e4537f0263964cf83a87ba1f49b7c4c1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221867
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental applicationAirborne-particle abrasionPolyether ether ketoneShear strengthSulfuric acidWettabilityThis study evaluated the influence of conventional and alternative surface treatments on wettability and the bond strength between polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and veneering resin. PEEK samples were randomly divided into five groups: sandblasting, tribochemical silica coating, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s, and tribochemical silica coating plus heated silane. One of them was subjected to analysis by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and ten were analyzed by goniometry (n = 5) and scanning electron microscopy (n = 5). Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested, and failure types were assessed. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey and Duncan tests (all, α = 5%). Treatment with sandblasting and silica coating had the lowest SBS means (4.2 MPa and 4.4 MPa respectively), while sulfuric acid for 5 s showed the highest mean value (12.6 MPa), followed by sulfuric acid for 30 s and tribochemical + heated silane. All failures were classified as adhesive. The lowest mean contact angle was found for the polished (control) and etched group with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s (83.9◦ ). Etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s increased the SBS between resin and PEEK.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Biotechnology Postgraduate Program Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES) RENORBIO, 1468 Marechal Campos AvenueDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), 777 Eng. José Longo AvenuePhysics Department Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA), 50 Marechal Eduardo Gomes SquareMSc-PhD Post-Graduate Program in Oral Science (Prosthodontic Unit) Faculty of Odontology Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 1184 Marechal Floriano Peixoto StreetDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), 777 Eng. José Longo AvenueCAPES: 10/2018RENORBIOUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA)Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)Villefort, Regina F.Anami, Lilian C. [UNESP]Campos, Tiago M. B.Melo, Renata M. [UNESP]Valandro, Luiz F.von Zeidler, Sandra L. V.Bottino, Marco A. [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:41:00Z2022-04-28T19:41:00Z2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings11060719Coatings, v. 11, n. 6, 2021.2079-6412http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22186710.3390/coatings110607192-s2.0-85108892923Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCoatingsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:41:00Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221867Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:16:33.094835Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application
title Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application
spellingShingle Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application
Villefort, Regina F.
Airborne-particle abrasion
Polyether ether ketone
Shear strength
Sulfuric acid
Wettability
title_short Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application
title_full Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application
title_fullStr Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application
title_full_unstemmed Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application
title_sort Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application
author Villefort, Regina F.
author_facet Villefort, Regina F.
Anami, Lilian C. [UNESP]
Campos, Tiago M. B.
Melo, Renata M. [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz F.
von Zeidler, Sandra L. V.
Bottino, Marco A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Anami, Lilian C. [UNESP]
Campos, Tiago M. B.
Melo, Renata M. [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz F.
von Zeidler, Sandra L. V.
Bottino, Marco A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RENORBIO
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA)
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Villefort, Regina F.
Anami, Lilian C. [UNESP]
Campos, Tiago M. B.
Melo, Renata M. [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz F.
von Zeidler, Sandra L. V.
Bottino, Marco A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Airborne-particle abrasion
Polyether ether ketone
Shear strength
Sulfuric acid
Wettability
topic Airborne-particle abrasion
Polyether ether ketone
Shear strength
Sulfuric acid
Wettability
description This study evaluated the influence of conventional and alternative surface treatments on wettability and the bond strength between polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and veneering resin. PEEK samples were randomly divided into five groups: sandblasting, tribochemical silica coating, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s, and tribochemical silica coating plus heated silane. One of them was subjected to analysis by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and ten were analyzed by goniometry (n = 5) and scanning electron microscopy (n = 5). Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested, and failure types were assessed. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey and Duncan tests (all, α = 5%). Treatment with sandblasting and silica coating had the lowest SBS means (4.2 MPa and 4.4 MPa respectively), while sulfuric acid for 5 s showed the highest mean value (12.6 MPa), followed by sulfuric acid for 30 s and tribochemical + heated silane. All failures were classified as adhesive. The lowest mean contact angle was found for the polished (control) and etched group with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s (83.9◦ ). Etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s increased the SBS between resin and PEEK.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
2022-04-28T19:41:00Z
2022-04-28T19:41:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings11060719
Coatings, v. 11, n. 6, 2021.
2079-6412
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221867
10.3390/coatings11060719
2-s2.0-85108892923
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings11060719
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221867
identifier_str_mv Coatings, v. 11, n. 6, 2021.
2079-6412
10.3390/coatings11060719
2-s2.0-85108892923
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Coatings
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129044533739520