Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz108 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198832 |
Resumo: | This experiment compared milk production, milk composition, and physiological responses in lactating dairy cows supplemented with or without a mixture of condensed tannins, encapsulated cinnamaldehyde, curcumin, capsaicin, and piperine. Thirty-six lactating, multiparous, pregnant 3/4 Holstein × 1.4 Gir cows were maintained in a single drylot pen with ad libitum access to water and a total-mixed ration and were milked twice daily (d -7 to 84). On d 0, cows were ranked by days in milk (86 ± 3 d), milk yield (27.8 ± 1.0 kg), body weight (BW; 584 ± 10 kg), and body condition score (BCS; 3.04 ± 0.06) and assigned to receive (SUPP; n = 18) or not (CON; n = 18) 30 g/cow daily (as-fed basis) of Actifor Pro (Delacon Biotechnik GmbH; Steyregg, Austria). From d 0 to 84, SUPP cows individually received (as-fed basis) 15 g of Actifor Pro mixed with 85 g of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates before each milking of the day. Each CON cow concurrently received 85 g (as-fed basis) of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates. Throughout the experimental period (d -7 to 84), cows from both treatments were administered 500 mg of sometribove zinc at 14-d intervals and were monitored daily for morbidity, including clinical mastitis. Individual milk production was recorded daily, whereas milk samples were collected weekly for analysis of milk composition. Cow BW, BCS, and blood samples were also collected weekly. Cows receiving SUPP gained more BCS (P = 0.05) and had greater (P = 0.04) milk yield during the experiment compared with CON cows (0.22 vs. 0.07 of BCS, SEM = 0.05; 29.5 vs. 27.9 kg/d, SEM = 0.5). Milk composition did not differ (P ≥ 0.15) between SUPP and CON cows; hence, SUPP cows also had greater (P ≤ 0.02) production of fat-corrected and energy-corrected milk. Incidence of clinical mastitis did not differ (P ≥ 0.49) between SUPP and CON cows. No treatment differences were also detected (P ≥ 0.21) for serum concentrations of glucose and serum urea N. Mean serum haptoglobin concentration during the experiment was greater (P = 0.05) in CON vs. SUPP cows. Cows receiving SUPP had less (P ≤ 0.04) serum cortisol concentrations on d 21 and 42, and greater (P ≤ 0.05) serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I on d 7, 35, and 63 compared with CON cows (treatment × day interactions; P ≤ 0.02). Collectively, supplementing phytogenic feed ingredients improved nutritional status and milk production of lactating 3/4 Holstein × 1/4 Gir cows. |
id |
UNSP_e4980e5fd38a00df3f0c7ca1a548577b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198832 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredientsdairy cattlemilk productionphysiologyphytogenic ingredientssupplementationThis experiment compared milk production, milk composition, and physiological responses in lactating dairy cows supplemented with or without a mixture of condensed tannins, encapsulated cinnamaldehyde, curcumin, capsaicin, and piperine. Thirty-six lactating, multiparous, pregnant 3/4 Holstein × 1.4 Gir cows were maintained in a single drylot pen with ad libitum access to water and a total-mixed ration and were milked twice daily (d -7 to 84). On d 0, cows were ranked by days in milk (86 ± 3 d), milk yield (27.8 ± 1.0 kg), body weight (BW; 584 ± 10 kg), and body condition score (BCS; 3.04 ± 0.06) and assigned to receive (SUPP; n = 18) or not (CON; n = 18) 30 g/cow daily (as-fed basis) of Actifor Pro (Delacon Biotechnik GmbH; Steyregg, Austria). From d 0 to 84, SUPP cows individually received (as-fed basis) 15 g of Actifor Pro mixed with 85 g of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates before each milking of the day. Each CON cow concurrently received 85 g (as-fed basis) of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates. Throughout the experimental period (d -7 to 84), cows from both treatments were administered 500 mg of sometribove zinc at 14-d intervals and were monitored daily for morbidity, including clinical mastitis. Individual milk production was recorded daily, whereas milk samples were collected weekly for analysis of milk composition. Cow BW, BCS, and blood samples were also collected weekly. Cows receiving SUPP gained more BCS (P = 0.05) and had greater (P = 0.04) milk yield during the experiment compared with CON cows (0.22 vs. 0.07 of BCS, SEM = 0.05; 29.5 vs. 27.9 kg/d, SEM = 0.5). Milk composition did not differ (P ≥ 0.15) between SUPP and CON cows; hence, SUPP cows also had greater (P ≤ 0.02) production of fat-corrected and energy-corrected milk. Incidence of clinical mastitis did not differ (P ≥ 0.49) between SUPP and CON cows. No treatment differences were also detected (P ≥ 0.21) for serum concentrations of glucose and serum urea N. Mean serum haptoglobin concentration during the experiment was greater (P = 0.05) in CON vs. SUPP cows. Cows receiving SUPP had less (P ≤ 0.04) serum cortisol concentrations on d 21 and 42, and greater (P ≤ 0.05) serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I on d 7, 35, and 63 compared with CON cows (treatment × day interactions; P ≤ 0.02). Collectively, supplementing phytogenic feed ingredients improved nutritional status and milk production of lactating 3/4 Holstein × 1/4 Gir cows.School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Animal Science Texas AandM UniversityDelacon Biotechnik GmbHSchool of Life Sciences Pontifical Catholic University of ParanáSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Texas AandM UniversityDelacon Biotechnik GmbHPontifical Catholic University of ParanáRodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP]Cooke, Reinaldo FFirmino, Franciele C [UNESP]Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP]Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP]Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP]Brandão, Alice PGex-Fabry, MOstrensky, AVasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:23:10Z2020-12-12T01:23:10Z2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article133-1142http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz108Translational Animal Science, v. 3, n. 4, p. 133-1142, 2019.2573-2102http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19883210.1093/tas/txz1082-s2.0-85084673059Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTranslational Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T20:36:23Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198832Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:49:00.679722Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients |
title |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients |
spellingShingle |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP] dairy cattle milk production physiology phytogenic ingredients supplementation |
title_short |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients |
title_full |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients |
title_fullStr |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients |
title_sort |
Productive and physiological responses of lactating dairy cows supplemented with phytogenic feed ingredients |
author |
Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP] Cooke, Reinaldo F Firmino, Franciele C [UNESP] Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP] Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP] Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP] Brandão, Alice P Gex-Fabry, M Ostrensky, A Vasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cooke, Reinaldo F Firmino, Franciele C [UNESP] Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP] Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP] Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP] Brandão, Alice P Gex-Fabry, M Ostrensky, A Vasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Texas AandM University Delacon Biotechnik GmbH Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Rodrigo O [UNESP] Cooke, Reinaldo F Firmino, Franciele C [UNESP] Moura, Mayara K. R [UNESP] Angeli, Beatriz F [UNESP] Ferreira, Hingryd A. O [UNESP] Brandão, Alice P Gex-Fabry, M Ostrensky, A Vasconcelos, Jose L. M [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
dairy cattle milk production physiology phytogenic ingredients supplementation |
topic |
dairy cattle milk production physiology phytogenic ingredients supplementation |
description |
This experiment compared milk production, milk composition, and physiological responses in lactating dairy cows supplemented with or without a mixture of condensed tannins, encapsulated cinnamaldehyde, curcumin, capsaicin, and piperine. Thirty-six lactating, multiparous, pregnant 3/4 Holstein × 1.4 Gir cows were maintained in a single drylot pen with ad libitum access to water and a total-mixed ration and were milked twice daily (d -7 to 84). On d 0, cows were ranked by days in milk (86 ± 3 d), milk yield (27.8 ± 1.0 kg), body weight (BW; 584 ± 10 kg), and body condition score (BCS; 3.04 ± 0.06) and assigned to receive (SUPP; n = 18) or not (CON; n = 18) 30 g/cow daily (as-fed basis) of Actifor Pro (Delacon Biotechnik GmbH; Steyregg, Austria). From d 0 to 84, SUPP cows individually received (as-fed basis) 15 g of Actifor Pro mixed with 85 g of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates before each milking of the day. Each CON cow concurrently received 85 g (as-fed basis) of finely ground corn through self-locking headgates. Throughout the experimental period (d -7 to 84), cows from both treatments were administered 500 mg of sometribove zinc at 14-d intervals and were monitored daily for morbidity, including clinical mastitis. Individual milk production was recorded daily, whereas milk samples were collected weekly for analysis of milk composition. Cow BW, BCS, and blood samples were also collected weekly. Cows receiving SUPP gained more BCS (P = 0.05) and had greater (P = 0.04) milk yield during the experiment compared with CON cows (0.22 vs. 0.07 of BCS, SEM = 0.05; 29.5 vs. 27.9 kg/d, SEM = 0.5). Milk composition did not differ (P ≥ 0.15) between SUPP and CON cows; hence, SUPP cows also had greater (P ≤ 0.02) production of fat-corrected and energy-corrected milk. Incidence of clinical mastitis did not differ (P ≥ 0.49) between SUPP and CON cows. No treatment differences were also detected (P ≥ 0.21) for serum concentrations of glucose and serum urea N. Mean serum haptoglobin concentration during the experiment was greater (P = 0.05) in CON vs. SUPP cows. Cows receiving SUPP had less (P ≤ 0.04) serum cortisol concentrations on d 21 and 42, and greater (P ≤ 0.05) serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I on d 7, 35, and 63 compared with CON cows (treatment × day interactions; P ≤ 0.02). Collectively, supplementing phytogenic feed ingredients improved nutritional status and milk production of lactating 3/4 Holstein × 1/4 Gir cows. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-01 2020-12-12T01:23:10Z 2020-12-12T01:23:10Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz108 Translational Animal Science, v. 3, n. 4, p. 133-1142, 2019. 2573-2102 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198832 10.1093/tas/txz108 2-s2.0-85084673059 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz108 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198832 |
identifier_str_mv |
Translational Animal Science, v. 3, n. 4, p. 133-1142, 2019. 2573-2102 10.1093/tas/txz108 2-s2.0-85084673059 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Translational Animal Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
133-1142 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128706333376512 |