Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kooij, Pepijn W. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Pellicer, Jaume
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/GBE/EVAA217
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206938
Resumo: Each day, as the amount of genomic data and bioinformatics resources grows, researchers are increasingly challenged with selecting the most appropriate approach to analyze their data. In addition, the opportunity to undertake comparative genomic analyses is growing rapidly. This is especially true for fungi due to their small genome sizes (i.e., mean 1C ¼ 44.2 Mb). Given these opportunities and aiming to gain novel insights into the evolution of mutualisms, we focus on comparing the quality of whole genome assemblies for fungus-growing ants cultivars (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) and a free-living relative. Our analyses reveal that currently available methodologies and pipelines for analyzing whole-genome sequence data need refining. By using different genome assemblers, we show that the genome assembly size depends on what software is used. This, in turn, impacts gene number predictions, with higher gene numbers correlating positively with genome assembly size. Furthermore, the majority of fungal genome size data currently available are based on estimates derived from whole-genome assemblies generated from short-read genome data, rather than from the more accurate technique of flow cytometry. Here, we estimated the haploid genome sizes of three ant fungal symbionts by flow cytometry using the fungus Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm. (1871) as a calibration standard. We found that published genome sizes based on genome assemblies are 2.5- to 3-fold larger than our estimates based on flow cytometry. We, therefore, recommend that flow cytometry is used to precalibrate genome assembly pipelines, to avoid incorrect estimates of genome sizes and ensure robust assemblies.
id UNSP_e54e2bf87b62cb9ea13a66d915edd453
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206938
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?EvolutionFungiFungus-growing antsGenome assemblyGenome sizeMutualismEach day, as the amount of genomic data and bioinformatics resources grows, researchers are increasingly challenged with selecting the most appropriate approach to analyze their data. In addition, the opportunity to undertake comparative genomic analyses is growing rapidly. This is especially true for fungi due to their small genome sizes (i.e., mean 1C ¼ 44.2 Mb). Given these opportunities and aiming to gain novel insights into the evolution of mutualisms, we focus on comparing the quality of whole genome assemblies for fungus-growing ants cultivars (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) and a free-living relative. Our analyses reveal that currently available methodologies and pipelines for analyzing whole-genome sequence data need refining. By using different genome assemblers, we show that the genome assembly size depends on what software is used. This, in turn, impacts gene number predictions, with higher gene numbers correlating positively with genome assembly size. Furthermore, the majority of fungal genome size data currently available are based on estimates derived from whole-genome assemblies generated from short-read genome data, rather than from the more accurate technique of flow cytometry. Here, we estimated the haploid genome sizes of three ant fungal symbionts by flow cytometry using the fungus Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm. (1871) as a calibration standard. We found that published genome sizes based on genome assemblies are 2.5- to 3-fold larger than our estimates based on flow cytometry. We, therefore, recommend that flow cytometry is used to precalibrate genome assembly pipelines, to avoid incorrect estimates of genome sizes and ensure robust assemblies.Department of Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology Royal Botanic GardensCenter for the Study of Social Insects São Paulo State University (UNESP)Institut Botanic de Barcelona (IBB CSIC-Ajuntament de Barcelona)Center for the Study of Social Insects São Paulo State University (UNESP)Royal Botanic GardensUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)CSIC-Ajuntament de Barcelona)Kooij, Pepijn W. [UNESP]Pellicer, Jaume2021-06-25T10:46:22Z2021-06-25T10:46:22Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2384-2390http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/GBE/EVAA217Genome Biology and Evolution, v. 12, n. 12, p. 2384-2390, 2020.1759-6653http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20693810.1093/GBE/EVAA2172-s2.0-85097271884Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengGenome Biology and Evolutioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-11T14:57:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206938Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:21:32.486383Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?
title Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?
spellingShingle Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?
Kooij, Pepijn W. [UNESP]
Evolution
Fungi
Fungus-growing ants
Genome assembly
Genome size
Mutualism
title_short Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?
title_full Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?
title_fullStr Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?
title_full_unstemmed Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?
title_sort Genome size versus genome assemblies: Are the genomes truly expanded in polyploid fungal symbionts?
author Kooij, Pepijn W. [UNESP]
author_facet Kooij, Pepijn W. [UNESP]
Pellicer, Jaume
author_role author
author2 Pellicer, Jaume
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Royal Botanic Gardens
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
CSIC-Ajuntament de Barcelona)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kooij, Pepijn W. [UNESP]
Pellicer, Jaume
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Evolution
Fungi
Fungus-growing ants
Genome assembly
Genome size
Mutualism
topic Evolution
Fungi
Fungus-growing ants
Genome assembly
Genome size
Mutualism
description Each day, as the amount of genomic data and bioinformatics resources grows, researchers are increasingly challenged with selecting the most appropriate approach to analyze their data. In addition, the opportunity to undertake comparative genomic analyses is growing rapidly. This is especially true for fungi due to their small genome sizes (i.e., mean 1C ¼ 44.2 Mb). Given these opportunities and aiming to gain novel insights into the evolution of mutualisms, we focus on comparing the quality of whole genome assemblies for fungus-growing ants cultivars (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) and a free-living relative. Our analyses reveal that currently available methodologies and pipelines for analyzing whole-genome sequence data need refining. By using different genome assemblers, we show that the genome assembly size depends on what software is used. This, in turn, impacts gene number predictions, with higher gene numbers correlating positively with genome assembly size. Furthermore, the majority of fungal genome size data currently available are based on estimates derived from whole-genome assemblies generated from short-read genome data, rather than from the more accurate technique of flow cytometry. Here, we estimated the haploid genome sizes of three ant fungal symbionts by flow cytometry using the fungus Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm. (1871) as a calibration standard. We found that published genome sizes based on genome assemblies are 2.5- to 3-fold larger than our estimates based on flow cytometry. We, therefore, recommend that flow cytometry is used to precalibrate genome assembly pipelines, to avoid incorrect estimates of genome sizes and ensure robust assemblies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
2021-06-25T10:46:22Z
2021-06-25T10:46:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/GBE/EVAA217
Genome Biology and Evolution, v. 12, n. 12, p. 2384-2390, 2020.
1759-6653
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206938
10.1093/GBE/EVAA217
2-s2.0-85097271884
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/GBE/EVAA217
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206938
identifier_str_mv Genome Biology and Evolution, v. 12, n. 12, p. 2384-2390, 2020.
1759-6653
10.1093/GBE/EVAA217
2-s2.0-85097271884
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Genome Biology and Evolution
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2384-2390
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129419766661120