Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-l-3 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170967 |
Resumo: | The goal of this research is to analyze ethical questions related to the organization of legislative in- formation (bills, laws, and speeches) within the scope of the Brazilian Federal legislature (Chamber of Deputies and Federal Senate). Field research including interviews was used to collect data in order to investigate the de-velopment of knowledge representation tools, such as thesauri and taxonomies, and subject indexing for organization of legislative information (bills, legislation, and speeches). The heads of all sectors responsible for the chosen activities were interviewed in person, and the answers were compared to common ethical problems described in knowledge organization (KO) literature. The results, in part, show a lack of clarity on ethical issues in the treatment of legislative information, pointing to ethical dilemmas and identifying problems such as informational directness, misrepresentation, and ambiguity, among others. The indexers in the Brazilian Congress found ambiguity the ethical aspect faced most often in their jobs. The next most frequent issue was professional inefficiency and in third place was a tie between informational directness and lack of cultural warrant. The research also describes solutions used for various ethical dilemmas. It was found that some indexing terms used to describe bills in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies have been subject to censorship and censored, or censurable, indexing terms have to be hidden in metadata so documents can be retrieved by users. It concludes that a greater ethical awareness of technical aspects is needed for Brazilian Federal legislative information professionals. |
id |
UNSP_e63be70786e51c142e18490dbc165915 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170967 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative informationEthical questionsEthicsKnowledge organizationLegislative informationThe goal of this research is to analyze ethical questions related to the organization of legislative in- formation (bills, laws, and speeches) within the scope of the Brazilian Federal legislature (Chamber of Deputies and Federal Senate). Field research including interviews was used to collect data in order to investigate the de-velopment of knowledge representation tools, such as thesauri and taxonomies, and subject indexing for organization of legislative information (bills, legislation, and speeches). The heads of all sectors responsible for the chosen activities were interviewed in person, and the answers were compared to common ethical problems described in knowledge organization (KO) literature. The results, in part, show a lack of clarity on ethical issues in the treatment of legislative information, pointing to ethical dilemmas and identifying problems such as informational directness, misrepresentation, and ambiguity, among others. The indexers in the Brazilian Congress found ambiguity the ethical aspect faced most often in their jobs. The next most frequent issue was professional inefficiency and in third place was a tie between informational directness and lack of cultural warrant. The research also describes solutions used for various ethical dilemmas. It was found that some indexing terms used to describe bills in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies have been subject to censorship and censored, or censurable, indexing terms have to be hidden in metadata so documents can be retrieved by users. It concludes that a greater ethical awareness of technical aspects is needed for Brazilian Federal legislative information professionals.Sao Paulo State University - UNESP Graduate School of Information Science, Avenida Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737Sao Paulo State University - UNESP Graduate School of Information Science, Avenida Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Brandt, Mariana Baptista [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:53:10Z2018-12-11T16:53:10Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article3-12http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-l-3Knowledge Organization, v. 45, n. 1, p. 3-12, 2018.0943-7444http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17096710.5771/0943-7444-2018-l-32-s2.0-85046479735Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengKnowledge Organization0,290info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T17:23:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170967Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T13:57:05.528755Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information |
title |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information |
spellingShingle |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information Brandt, Mariana Baptista [UNESP] Ethical questions Ethics Knowledge organization Legislative information |
title_short |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information |
title_full |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information |
title_fullStr |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information |
title_sort |
Ethical aspects in the organization of legislative information |
author |
Brandt, Mariana Baptista [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Brandt, Mariana Baptista [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brandt, Mariana Baptista [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ethical questions Ethics Knowledge organization Legislative information |
topic |
Ethical questions Ethics Knowledge organization Legislative information |
description |
The goal of this research is to analyze ethical questions related to the organization of legislative in- formation (bills, laws, and speeches) within the scope of the Brazilian Federal legislature (Chamber of Deputies and Federal Senate). Field research including interviews was used to collect data in order to investigate the de-velopment of knowledge representation tools, such as thesauri and taxonomies, and subject indexing for organization of legislative information (bills, legislation, and speeches). The heads of all sectors responsible for the chosen activities were interviewed in person, and the answers were compared to common ethical problems described in knowledge organization (KO) literature. The results, in part, show a lack of clarity on ethical issues in the treatment of legislative information, pointing to ethical dilemmas and identifying problems such as informational directness, misrepresentation, and ambiguity, among others. The indexers in the Brazilian Congress found ambiguity the ethical aspect faced most often in their jobs. The next most frequent issue was professional inefficiency and in third place was a tie between informational directness and lack of cultural warrant. The research also describes solutions used for various ethical dilemmas. It was found that some indexing terms used to describe bills in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies have been subject to censorship and censored, or censurable, indexing terms have to be hidden in metadata so documents can be retrieved by users. It concludes that a greater ethical awareness of technical aspects is needed for Brazilian Federal legislative information professionals. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T16:53:10Z 2018-12-11T16:53:10Z 2018-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-l-3 Knowledge Organization, v. 45, n. 1, p. 3-12, 2018. 0943-7444 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170967 10.5771/0943-7444-2018-l-3 2-s2.0-85046479735 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-l-3 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170967 |
identifier_str_mv |
Knowledge Organization, v. 45, n. 1, p. 3-12, 2018. 0943-7444 10.5771/0943-7444-2018-l-3 2-s2.0-85046479735 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Knowledge Organization 0,290 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
3-12 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128294426509312 |