Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2019.VOL33.0113 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199761 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to compare the scores of the Helplessness, Magnification, Rumination, and Catastrophizing factors of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) between samples with different pain characteristics. The psychometric properties of the PCS were evaluated in 1,151 Brazilian adults (78.9% female; 38.6 (SD = 10.8) years): 335 had no pain, 390 had been in pain for less than 3 months, 250 had been in recurring pain for more than 3 months, and 176 had been in continuous pain for more than 3 months. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to verify the fit of the PCS models. Convergent validity and reliability were evaluated. Multi-group analysis was used to estimate the invariance of the factorial model. The global score for the PCS factors was obtained using the regression weight matrix for estimating factor scores from CFA. Analysis of variance was used to compare scores between samples. After excluding three items, the tri-factorial model showed adequate fit. The model parameters were invariant (Δχ2 (λ, i, β, Res); p≥0.05). Individuals experiencing pain showed higher scores for catastrophic thoughts. Individuals with pain for less than 3 months had the highest scores for Rumination (p < 0.001). The PCS showed valid, reliable, and invariant results for the sample of Brazilian adults in no pain or with different pain conditions. The PCS adequately discriminated individuals in pain from those without pain. Among those in pain, Rumination was the only discriminating factor. |
id |
UNSP_e7b1d295bd44c1a0a5fb0008bf9647e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199761 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristicCatastrophizationPainPsychometricsThe objective of this study was to compare the scores of the Helplessness, Magnification, Rumination, and Catastrophizing factors of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) between samples with different pain characteristics. The psychometric properties of the PCS were evaluated in 1,151 Brazilian adults (78.9% female; 38.6 (SD = 10.8) years): 335 had no pain, 390 had been in pain for less than 3 months, 250 had been in recurring pain for more than 3 months, and 176 had been in continuous pain for more than 3 months. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to verify the fit of the PCS models. Convergent validity and reliability were evaluated. Multi-group analysis was used to estimate the invariance of the factorial model. The global score for the PCS factors was obtained using the regression weight matrix for estimating factor scores from CFA. Analysis of variance was used to compare scores between samples. After excluding three items, the tri-factorial model showed adequate fit. The model parameters were invariant (Δχ2 (λ, i, β, Res); p≥0.05). Individuals experiencing pain showed higher scores for catastrophic thoughts. Individuals with pain for less than 3 months had the highest scores for Rumination (p < 0.001). The PCS showed valid, reliable, and invariant results for the sample of Brazilian adults in no pain or with different pain conditions. The PCS adequately discriminated individuals in pain from those without pain. Among those in pain, Rumination was the only discriminating factor.Universidade Estadual Paulista-Unesp School of DentistryUniversity Institute of Psychological Social and Life Sciences-ISPA William James Center for ResearchUniversidade Estadual Paulista-Unesp School of of Pharmaceutical Sciences Department of Food and NutritionUniversidade Estadual Paulista-Unesp School of DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista-Unesp School of of Pharmaceutical Sciences Department of Food and NutritionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)William James Center for ResearchBonafé, Fernanda Salloume Sampaio [UNESP]Campos, Lucas Arrais [UNESP]Marôco, JoãoCampos, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:48:37Z2020-12-12T01:48:37Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2019.VOL33.0113Brazilian Oral Research, v. 33.1807-31071806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19976110.1590/1807-3107BOR-2019.VOL33.0113S1806-832420190001002852-s2.0-85076008936S1806-83242019000100285.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Oral Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-21T12:46:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199761Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:00:08.521050Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic |
title |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic |
spellingShingle |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic Bonafé, Fernanda Salloume Sampaio [UNESP] Catastrophization Pain Psychometrics |
title_short |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic |
title_full |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic |
title_fullStr |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic |
title_sort |
Pain catastrophizing: Rumination is a discriminating factor among individuals with different pain characteristic |
author |
Bonafé, Fernanda Salloume Sampaio [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Bonafé, Fernanda Salloume Sampaio [UNESP] Campos, Lucas Arrais [UNESP] Marôco, João Campos, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, Lucas Arrais [UNESP] Marôco, João Campos, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) William James Center for Research |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bonafé, Fernanda Salloume Sampaio [UNESP] Campos, Lucas Arrais [UNESP] Marôco, João Campos, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Catastrophization Pain Psychometrics |
topic |
Catastrophization Pain Psychometrics |
description |
The objective of this study was to compare the scores of the Helplessness, Magnification, Rumination, and Catastrophizing factors of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) between samples with different pain characteristics. The psychometric properties of the PCS were evaluated in 1,151 Brazilian adults (78.9% female; 38.6 (SD = 10.8) years): 335 had no pain, 390 had been in pain for less than 3 months, 250 had been in recurring pain for more than 3 months, and 176 had been in continuous pain for more than 3 months. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to verify the fit of the PCS models. Convergent validity and reliability were evaluated. Multi-group analysis was used to estimate the invariance of the factorial model. The global score for the PCS factors was obtained using the regression weight matrix for estimating factor scores from CFA. Analysis of variance was used to compare scores between samples. After excluding three items, the tri-factorial model showed adequate fit. The model parameters were invariant (Δχ2 (λ, i, β, Res); p≥0.05). Individuals experiencing pain showed higher scores for catastrophic thoughts. Individuals with pain for less than 3 months had the highest scores for Rumination (p < 0.001). The PCS showed valid, reliable, and invariant results for the sample of Brazilian adults in no pain or with different pain conditions. The PCS adequately discriminated individuals in pain from those without pain. Among those in pain, Rumination was the only discriminating factor. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 2020-12-12T01:48:37Z 2020-12-12T01:48:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2019.VOL33.0113 Brazilian Oral Research, v. 33. 1807-3107 1806-8324 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199761 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2019.VOL33.0113 S1806-83242019000100285 2-s2.0-85076008936 S1806-83242019000100285.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2019.VOL33.0113 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199761 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research, v. 33. 1807-3107 1806-8324 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2019.VOL33.0113 S1806-83242019000100285 2-s2.0-85076008936 S1806-83242019000100285.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128735560335360 |