Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP], Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP], Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP], Tribst, João Paulo Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233638
Resumo: Purpose: Using the microshear bond strength (pSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the pSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed. Conclusion: The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.
id UNSP_e8853b4ff1248ec63b0ef4b2d50aa6a0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233638
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layerbond strengthceramichybrid ceramicPurpose: Using the microshear bond strength (pSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the pSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed. Conclusion: The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.PhD Student Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyMSc Student Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyProfessor Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyProfessor Department of Dentistry University of Taubaté (UNITAU)PhD Student Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyMSc Student Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyProfessor Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of Taubaté (UNITAU)Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP]Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP]Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP]Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]Tribst, João Paulo Mendes2022-05-01T09:31:04Z2022-05-01T09:31:04Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article429-435http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 23, n. 5, p. 429-435, 2021.1757-99881461-5185http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23363810.3290/j.jad.b20002352-s2.0-85116738095Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Adhesive Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T09:31:04Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233638Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:41:35.681606Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
title Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
spellingShingle Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP]
bond strength
ceramic
hybrid ceramic
title_short Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
title_full Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
title_fullStr Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
title_sort Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
author Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP]
author_facet Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP]
Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP]
Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes
author_role author
author2 Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP]
Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Taubaté (UNITAU)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP]
Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP]
Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bond strength
ceramic
hybrid ceramic
topic bond strength
ceramic
hybrid ceramic
description Purpose: Using the microshear bond strength (pSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the pSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed. Conclusion: The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-05-01T09:31:04Z
2022-05-01T09:31:04Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 23, n. 5, p. 429-435, 2021.
1757-9988
1461-5185
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233638
10.3290/j.jad.b2000235
2-s2.0-85116738095
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233638
identifier_str_mv Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 23, n. 5, p. 429-435, 2021.
1757-9988
1461-5185
10.3290/j.jad.b2000235
2-s2.0-85116738095
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 429-435
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129347678109696