Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233638 |
Resumo: | Purpose: Using the microshear bond strength (pSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the pSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed. Conclusion: The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic. |
id |
UNSP_e8853b4ff1248ec63b0ef4b2d50aa6a0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233638 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layerbond strengthceramichybrid ceramicPurpose: Using the microshear bond strength (pSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the pSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed. Conclusion: The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.PhD Student Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyMSc Student Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyProfessor Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyProfessor Department of Dentistry University of Taubaté (UNITAU)PhD Student Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyMSc Student Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyProfessor Postgraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Science and TechnologyUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of Taubaté (UNITAU)Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP]Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP]Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP]Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]Tribst, João Paulo Mendes2022-05-01T09:31:04Z2022-05-01T09:31:04Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article429-435http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 23, n. 5, p. 429-435, 2021.1757-99881461-5185http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23363810.3290/j.jad.b20002352-s2.0-85116738095Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Adhesive Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T09:31:04Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233638Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:41:35.681606Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer |
title |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer |
spellingShingle |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP] bond strength ceramic hybrid ceramic |
title_short |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer |
title_full |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer |
title_fullStr |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer |
title_sort |
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer |
author |
Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP] Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP] Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] Tribst, João Paulo Mendes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP] Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] Tribst, João Paulo Mendes |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) University of Taubaté (UNITAU) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grangeiro, Manassés Tercio Vieira [UNESP] Rossi, Natalia Rivoli [UNESP] Barreto, Larissa Araújo Lopes [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] Tribst, João Paulo Mendes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bond strength ceramic hybrid ceramic |
topic |
bond strength ceramic hybrid ceramic |
description |
Purpose: Using the microshear bond strength (pSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the pSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed. Conclusion: The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-05-01T09:31:04Z 2022-05-01T09:31:04Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235 Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 23, n. 5, p. 429-435, 2021. 1757-9988 1461-5185 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233638 10.3290/j.jad.b2000235 2-s2.0-85116738095 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233638 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 23, n. 5, p. 429-435, 2021. 1757-9988 1461-5185 10.3290/j.jad.b2000235 2-s2.0-85116738095 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
429-435 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129347678109696 |