Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Lapola, David M. [UNESP], Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP], Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP], Pinho, Patricia, Priess, Joerg A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169078
Resumo: In this paper the initial draft design of a payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme in a municipality within the sugarcane belt of São Paulo state, Brazil (PES-RC), is compared with prevailing characteristics of successful PES cases in Latin America (PES-LA). This systematic comparison is performed by analyzing four major characteristics of PES: identity of traded ecosystem service (ES); spatial scale; type of transaction involved between ES providers and beneficiaries; and the involved actors. Information on the biophysical characteristics, institutional arrangement and financial options of PES-RC were assessed using participatory methods. We found that on the one hand there is an agreement between our case study and the prevailing successful cases of PES-LA regarding the traded ES (water) and the PES spatial scale (local). However, stakeholder opinions diverge from the success cases when it comes to the type of transaction (cash preferred in PES-RC; in-kind in successful PES-LA) and the involved actors. Our results raise the question whether stakeholder opinions or the characteristics of successful (or failure) cases should be prioritized when planning and operationalizing new PES schemes. We argue that stakeholder participation should be considered as an additional success criterion for the construction of public policies directed towards PES implementation.
id UNSP_e9eb0adeb17ef3b818387745278083ea
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169078
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?Atlantic ForestBrazilian Forest CodeNature conservationParticipatory methodsPublic policiesRio Claro - SP municipalityIn this paper the initial draft design of a payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme in a municipality within the sugarcane belt of São Paulo state, Brazil (PES-RC), is compared with prevailing characteristics of successful PES cases in Latin America (PES-LA). This systematic comparison is performed by analyzing four major characteristics of PES: identity of traded ecosystem service (ES); spatial scale; type of transaction involved between ES providers and beneficiaries; and the involved actors. Information on the biophysical characteristics, institutional arrangement and financial options of PES-RC were assessed using participatory methods. We found that on the one hand there is an agreement between our case study and the prevailing successful cases of PES-LA regarding the traded ES (water) and the PES spatial scale (local). However, stakeholder opinions diverge from the success cases when it comes to the type of transaction (cash preferred in PES-RC; in-kind in successful PES-LA) and the involved actors. Our results raise the question whether stakeholder opinions or the characteristics of successful (or failure) cases should be prioritized when planning and operationalizing new PES schemes. We argue that stakeholder participation should be considered as an additional success criterion for the construction of public policies directed towards PES implementation.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Biodiversidade - Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESPLaboratório de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre Departamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Avenida 24-A, 1515, CEPINCLINE Instituto de Astronomia e Geofísica Universidade de São Paulo – USPDepartment Computational Landscape Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Biodiversidade - Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESPLaboratório de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre Departamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Avenida 24-A, 1515, CEPFAPESP: 2014/08345-0Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZSilva, Rafaela A. [UNESP]Lapola, David M. [UNESP]Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP]Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP]Pinho, PatriciaPriess, Joerg A. [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:44:22Z2018-12-11T16:44:22Z2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article128-138application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013Ecosystem Services, v. 22, p. 128-138.2212-0416http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16907810.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.0132-s2.0-849939694902-s2.0-84993969490.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcosystem Services1,743info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-24T06:18:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169078Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:38:43.887955Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
title Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
spellingShingle Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP]
Atlantic Forest
Brazilian Forest Code
Nature conservation
Participatory methods
Public policies
Rio Claro - SP municipality
title_short Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
title_full Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
title_fullStr Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
title_full_unstemmed Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
title_sort Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
author Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP]
author_facet Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP]
Lapola, David M. [UNESP]
Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP]
Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP]
Pinho, Patricia
Priess, Joerg A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lapola, David M. [UNESP]
Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP]
Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP]
Pinho, Patricia
Priess, Joerg A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP]
Lapola, David M. [UNESP]
Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP]
Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP]
Pinho, Patricia
Priess, Joerg A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Atlantic Forest
Brazilian Forest Code
Nature conservation
Participatory methods
Public policies
Rio Claro - SP municipality
topic Atlantic Forest
Brazilian Forest Code
Nature conservation
Participatory methods
Public policies
Rio Claro - SP municipality
description In this paper the initial draft design of a payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme in a municipality within the sugarcane belt of São Paulo state, Brazil (PES-RC), is compared with prevailing characteristics of successful PES cases in Latin America (PES-LA). This systematic comparison is performed by analyzing four major characteristics of PES: identity of traded ecosystem service (ES); spatial scale; type of transaction involved between ES providers and beneficiaries; and the involved actors. Information on the biophysical characteristics, institutional arrangement and financial options of PES-RC were assessed using participatory methods. We found that on the one hand there is an agreement between our case study and the prevailing successful cases of PES-LA regarding the traded ES (water) and the PES spatial scale (local). However, stakeholder opinions diverge from the success cases when it comes to the type of transaction (cash preferred in PES-RC; in-kind in successful PES-LA) and the involved actors. Our results raise the question whether stakeholder opinions or the characteristics of successful (or failure) cases should be prioritized when planning and operationalizing new PES schemes. We argue that stakeholder participation should be considered as an additional success criterion for the construction of public policies directed towards PES implementation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
2018-12-11T16:44:22Z
2018-12-11T16:44:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013
Ecosystem Services, v. 22, p. 128-138.
2212-0416
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169078
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013
2-s2.0-84993969490
2-s2.0-84993969490.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169078
identifier_str_mv Ecosystem Services, v. 22, p. 128-138.
2212-0416
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013
2-s2.0-84993969490
2-s2.0-84993969490.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ecosystem Services
1,743
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 128-138
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128959084232704