Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169078 |
Resumo: | In this paper the initial draft design of a payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme in a municipality within the sugarcane belt of São Paulo state, Brazil (PES-RC), is compared with prevailing characteristics of successful PES cases in Latin America (PES-LA). This systematic comparison is performed by analyzing four major characteristics of PES: identity of traded ecosystem service (ES); spatial scale; type of transaction involved between ES providers and beneficiaries; and the involved actors. Information on the biophysical characteristics, institutional arrangement and financial options of PES-RC were assessed using participatory methods. We found that on the one hand there is an agreement between our case study and the prevailing successful cases of PES-LA regarding the traded ES (water) and the PES spatial scale (local). However, stakeholder opinions diverge from the success cases when it comes to the type of transaction (cash preferred in PES-RC; in-kind in successful PES-LA) and the involved actors. Our results raise the question whether stakeholder opinions or the characteristics of successful (or failure) cases should be prioritized when planning and operationalizing new PES schemes. We argue that stakeholder participation should be considered as an additional success criterion for the construction of public policies directed towards PES implementation. |
id |
UNSP_e9eb0adeb17ef3b818387745278083ea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169078 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America?Atlantic ForestBrazilian Forest CodeNature conservationParticipatory methodsPublic policiesRio Claro - SP municipalityIn this paper the initial draft design of a payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme in a municipality within the sugarcane belt of São Paulo state, Brazil (PES-RC), is compared with prevailing characteristics of successful PES cases in Latin America (PES-LA). This systematic comparison is performed by analyzing four major characteristics of PES: identity of traded ecosystem service (ES); spatial scale; type of transaction involved between ES providers and beneficiaries; and the involved actors. Information on the biophysical characteristics, institutional arrangement and financial options of PES-RC were assessed using participatory methods. We found that on the one hand there is an agreement between our case study and the prevailing successful cases of PES-LA regarding the traded ES (water) and the PES spatial scale (local). However, stakeholder opinions diverge from the success cases when it comes to the type of transaction (cash preferred in PES-RC; in-kind in successful PES-LA) and the involved actors. Our results raise the question whether stakeholder opinions or the characteristics of successful (or failure) cases should be prioritized when planning and operationalizing new PES schemes. We argue that stakeholder participation should be considered as an additional success criterion for the construction of public policies directed towards PES implementation.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Biodiversidade - Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESPLaboratório de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre Departamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Avenida 24-A, 1515, CEPINCLINE Instituto de Astronomia e Geofísica Universidade de São Paulo – USPDepartment Computational Landscape Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Biodiversidade - Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESPLaboratório de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre Departamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Avenida 24-A, 1515, CEPFAPESP: 2014/08345-0Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZSilva, Rafaela A. [UNESP]Lapola, David M. [UNESP]Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP]Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP]Pinho, PatriciaPriess, Joerg A. [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:44:22Z2018-12-11T16:44:22Z2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article128-138application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013Ecosystem Services, v. 22, p. 128-138.2212-0416http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16907810.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.0132-s2.0-849939694902-s2.0-84993969490.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcosystem Services1,743info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-24T06:18:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169078Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:38:43.887955Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America? |
title |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America? |
spellingShingle |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America? Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP] Atlantic Forest Brazilian Forest Code Nature conservation Participatory methods Public policies Rio Claro - SP municipality |
title_short |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America? |
title_full |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America? |
title_fullStr |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America? |
title_sort |
Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services in Brazil's sugarcane belt: How do stakeholder opinions match with successful cases in Latin America? |
author |
Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP] Lapola, David M. [UNESP] Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP] Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP] Pinho, Patricia Priess, Joerg A. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lapola, David M. [UNESP] Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP] Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP] Pinho, Patricia Priess, Joerg A. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Rafaela A. [UNESP] Lapola, David M. [UNESP] Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP] Teixeira, Moara C. [UNESP] Pinho, Patricia Priess, Joerg A. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Atlantic Forest Brazilian Forest Code Nature conservation Participatory methods Public policies Rio Claro - SP municipality |
topic |
Atlantic Forest Brazilian Forest Code Nature conservation Participatory methods Public policies Rio Claro - SP municipality |
description |
In this paper the initial draft design of a payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme in a municipality within the sugarcane belt of São Paulo state, Brazil (PES-RC), is compared with prevailing characteristics of successful PES cases in Latin America (PES-LA). This systematic comparison is performed by analyzing four major characteristics of PES: identity of traded ecosystem service (ES); spatial scale; type of transaction involved between ES providers and beneficiaries; and the involved actors. Information on the biophysical characteristics, institutional arrangement and financial options of PES-RC were assessed using participatory methods. We found that on the one hand there is an agreement between our case study and the prevailing successful cases of PES-LA regarding the traded ES (water) and the PES spatial scale (local). However, stakeholder opinions diverge from the success cases when it comes to the type of transaction (cash preferred in PES-RC; in-kind in successful PES-LA) and the involved actors. Our results raise the question whether stakeholder opinions or the characteristics of successful (or failure) cases should be prioritized when planning and operationalizing new PES schemes. We argue that stakeholder participation should be considered as an additional success criterion for the construction of public policies directed towards PES implementation. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-01 2018-12-11T16:44:22Z 2018-12-11T16:44:22Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013 Ecosystem Services, v. 22, p. 128-138. 2212-0416 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169078 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013 2-s2.0-84993969490 2-s2.0-84993969490.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169078 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ecosystem Services, v. 22, p. 128-138. 2212-0416 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.013 2-s2.0-84993969490 2-s2.0-84993969490.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecosystem Services 1,743 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
128-138 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128959084232704 |