Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rabelo, Carlos H.S. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Valente, André L.S. [UNESP], Barbero, Rondineli P. [UNESP], Basso, Fernanda C. [UNESP], Reis, R. A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN16358
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171164
Resumo: Our objective was to evaluate the effect of lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis as silage additives on feed intake and growth performance of finishing feedlot beef cattle. Whole-maize forage was ensiled either with distilled water (untreated), or inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri and L. plantarum at a rate 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh forage for each bacteria (LBLP); or inoculated with B. subtilis and L. plantarum at a rate 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh forage for each bacteria (BSLP). Thirty-six young crossbreed bulls (316 ± 33.9 kg) were used in the feedlot program for 110 days, and they were assigned (n = 12) to one of three diets containing untreated, LBLP, or BSLP silages in a 40: 60 forage: concentrate ratio. Dry matter (DM) intake, average daily gain, and carcass yield of bulls were unaffected by silage inoculation. Conversely, bulls fed the BSLP silage had lower DM, organic matter, and crude protein digestibility compared with bulls fed untreated silage. Bulls fed both inoculated silages had a reduction of ∼12% in neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre digestibility compared with that in bulls fed untreated silage. Bulls fed the LBLP silage spent more time chewing (496 min/day) than bulls fed untreated silage. There was little effect of silage inoculation on rumen fermentation, but bulls fed the inoculated silages had a lower concentration of ammonia-N. In conclusion, adding L. plantarum combined with L. buchneri or B. subtilis to maize silage do not improve the growth performance of finishing feedlot beef cattle.
id UNSP_ec770dd62c39eaf9435d383a8dde9b66
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/171164
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilisdigestibilityingestive behaviourLactobacillus spp.ruminal fermentationsilage inoculanttropical silageOur objective was to evaluate the effect of lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis as silage additives on feed intake and growth performance of finishing feedlot beef cattle. Whole-maize forage was ensiled either with distilled water (untreated), or inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri and L. plantarum at a rate 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh forage for each bacteria (LBLP); or inoculated with B. subtilis and L. plantarum at a rate 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh forage for each bacteria (BSLP). Thirty-six young crossbreed bulls (316 ± 33.9 kg) were used in the feedlot program for 110 days, and they were assigned (n = 12) to one of three diets containing untreated, LBLP, or BSLP silages in a 40: 60 forage: concentrate ratio. Dry matter (DM) intake, average daily gain, and carcass yield of bulls were unaffected by silage inoculation. Conversely, bulls fed the BSLP silage had lower DM, organic matter, and crude protein digestibility compared with bulls fed untreated silage. Bulls fed both inoculated silages had a reduction of ∼12% in neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre digestibility compared with that in bulls fed untreated silage. Bulls fed the LBLP silage spent more time chewing (496 min/day) than bulls fed untreated silage. There was little effect of silage inoculation on rumen fermentation, but bulls fed the inoculated silages had a lower concentration of ammonia-N. In conclusion, adding L. plantarum combined with L. buchneri or B. subtilis to maize silage do not improve the growth performance of finishing feedlot beef cattle.UNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista Department of Animal SciencesUNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista Department of Animal SciencesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Rabelo, Carlos H.S. [UNESP]Valente, André L.S. [UNESP]Barbero, Rondineli P. [UNESP]Basso, Fernanda C. [UNESP]Reis, R. A. [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:54:12Z2018-12-11T16:54:12Z2018-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN16358Animal Production Science.1836-57871836-0939http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17116410.1071/AN163582-s2.0-85049337498Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimal Production Science0,6370,637info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T14:40:36Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/171164Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:14:15.605123Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis
title Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis
spellingShingle Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis
Rabelo, Carlos H.S. [UNESP]
digestibility
ingestive behaviour
Lactobacillus spp.
ruminal fermentation
silage inoculant
tropical silage
title_short Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis
title_full Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis
title_fullStr Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis
title_full_unstemmed Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis
title_sort Performance of finishing beef cattle fed diets containing maize silages inoculated with lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis
author Rabelo, Carlos H.S. [UNESP]
author_facet Rabelo, Carlos H.S. [UNESP]
Valente, André L.S. [UNESP]
Barbero, Rondineli P. [UNESP]
Basso, Fernanda C. [UNESP]
Reis, R. A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Valente, André L.S. [UNESP]
Barbero, Rondineli P. [UNESP]
Basso, Fernanda C. [UNESP]
Reis, R. A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rabelo, Carlos H.S. [UNESP]
Valente, André L.S. [UNESP]
Barbero, Rondineli P. [UNESP]
Basso, Fernanda C. [UNESP]
Reis, R. A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv digestibility
ingestive behaviour
Lactobacillus spp.
ruminal fermentation
silage inoculant
tropical silage
topic digestibility
ingestive behaviour
Lactobacillus spp.
ruminal fermentation
silage inoculant
tropical silage
description Our objective was to evaluate the effect of lactic-acid bacteria and Bacillus subtilis as silage additives on feed intake and growth performance of finishing feedlot beef cattle. Whole-maize forage was ensiled either with distilled water (untreated), or inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri and L. plantarum at a rate 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh forage for each bacteria (LBLP); or inoculated with B. subtilis and L. plantarum at a rate 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh forage for each bacteria (BSLP). Thirty-six young crossbreed bulls (316 ± 33.9 kg) were used in the feedlot program for 110 days, and they were assigned (n = 12) to one of three diets containing untreated, LBLP, or BSLP silages in a 40: 60 forage: concentrate ratio. Dry matter (DM) intake, average daily gain, and carcass yield of bulls were unaffected by silage inoculation. Conversely, bulls fed the BSLP silage had lower DM, organic matter, and crude protein digestibility compared with bulls fed untreated silage. Bulls fed both inoculated silages had a reduction of ∼12% in neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre digestibility compared with that in bulls fed untreated silage. Bulls fed the LBLP silage spent more time chewing (496 min/day) than bulls fed untreated silage. There was little effect of silage inoculation on rumen fermentation, but bulls fed the inoculated silages had a lower concentration of ammonia-N. In conclusion, adding L. plantarum combined with L. buchneri or B. subtilis to maize silage do not improve the growth performance of finishing feedlot beef cattle.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T16:54:12Z
2018-12-11T16:54:12Z
2018-01-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN16358
Animal Production Science.
1836-5787
1836-0939
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171164
10.1071/AN16358
2-s2.0-85049337498
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN16358
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171164
identifier_str_mv Animal Production Science.
1836-5787
1836-0939
10.1071/AN16358
2-s2.0-85049337498
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Animal Production Science
0,637
0,637
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128776636203008