Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190505 |
Resumo: | This double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of dentin pretreatment with 100% ethanol (EWBT - ethanol wet bonding technique) and different adhesive protocols in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL) after 6 months. Patients presenting at least one NCCL were included. NCCLs (n=148) were randomly assigned to 4 groups: NE (Non-EWBT + three-step etch-and-rinse (Scotchbond Multi Purpose, 3M ESPE [MP]), E (EWBT + MP); EB (EWBT + [Bond - third step of MP]), and EU (EWBT + universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE). Conventional acid-etching (Condac 37%, FGM) and nanohybrid resin composite (Z350, 3M ESPE) were used. Trained and calibrated examiners (Kappa = 0.61) evaluated the restorations at baseline (7 days) and 6-month recall using the USPHS modified criteria. Data were subjected to Chi square (α = 0.05). Differences in the success rate were found for the treatments (p = 0.003). EB presented the lowest success rate compared with the other groups (p < 0.02). No significant differences were detected among NE, E, and EU (p > 0.49). The survival rates were 97.23%, 97.30%, 78.95%, and 97.30% for NE, E, EB, and EU, respectively. Regarding postoperative sensitivity, a significant reduction was found for groups E (p = 0.027) and EU (p < 0.01) after 6 months. After 6 months, EWBT associated to the hydrophobic adhesive system had the highest failure rate. |
id |
UNSP_ecd1f1af2385f1e75f23133455e1716f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190505 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trialThis double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of dentin pretreatment with 100% ethanol (EWBT - ethanol wet bonding technique) and different adhesive protocols in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL) after 6 months. Patients presenting at least one NCCL were included. NCCLs (n=148) were randomly assigned to 4 groups: NE (Non-EWBT + three-step etch-and-rinse (Scotchbond Multi Purpose, 3M ESPE [MP]), E (EWBT + MP); EB (EWBT + [Bond - third step of MP]), and EU (EWBT + universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE). Conventional acid-etching (Condac 37%, FGM) and nanohybrid resin composite (Z350, 3M ESPE) were used. Trained and calibrated examiners (Kappa = 0.61) evaluated the restorations at baseline (7 days) and 6-month recall using the USPHS modified criteria. Data were subjected to Chi square (α = 0.05). Differences in the success rate were found for the treatments (p = 0.003). EB presented the lowest success rate compared with the other groups (p < 0.02). No significant differences were detected among NE, E, and EU (p > 0.49). The survival rates were 97.23%, 97.30%, 78.95%, and 97.30% for NE, E, EB, and EU, respectively. Regarding postoperative sensitivity, a significant reduction was found for groups E (p = 0.027) and EU (p < 0.01) after 6 months. After 6 months, EWBT associated to the hydrophobic adhesive system had the highest failure rate.Universidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp Institute of Science and Technology Department of Restorative DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp Institute of Science and Technology Department of Restorative DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Souza, Maurício Yugo de [UNESP]Jurema, Ana Luiza Barbosa [UNESP]Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP]Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP]2019-10-06T17:15:23Z2019-10-06T17:15:23Z2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlee052application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052Brazilian oral research, v. 33, p. e052-.1807-3107http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19050510.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052S1806-832420190001002442-s2.0-85069267429S1806-83242019000100244.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian oral researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-11-18T18:51:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190505Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-11-18T18:51:31Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial |
title |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial |
spellingShingle |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial Souza, Maurício Yugo de [UNESP] |
title_short |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial |
title_full |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial |
title_fullStr |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial |
title_sort |
Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial |
author |
Souza, Maurício Yugo de [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Souza, Maurício Yugo de [UNESP] Jurema, Ana Luiza Barbosa [UNESP] Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP] Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jurema, Ana Luiza Barbosa [UNESP] Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP] Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Maurício Yugo de [UNESP] Jurema, Ana Luiza Barbosa [UNESP] Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP] Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP] |
description |
This double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of dentin pretreatment with 100% ethanol (EWBT - ethanol wet bonding technique) and different adhesive protocols in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL) after 6 months. Patients presenting at least one NCCL were included. NCCLs (n=148) were randomly assigned to 4 groups: NE (Non-EWBT + three-step etch-and-rinse (Scotchbond Multi Purpose, 3M ESPE [MP]), E (EWBT + MP); EB (EWBT + [Bond - third step of MP]), and EU (EWBT + universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE). Conventional acid-etching (Condac 37%, FGM) and nanohybrid resin composite (Z350, 3M ESPE) were used. Trained and calibrated examiners (Kappa = 0.61) evaluated the restorations at baseline (7 days) and 6-month recall using the USPHS modified criteria. Data were subjected to Chi square (α = 0.05). Differences in the success rate were found for the treatments (p = 0.003). EB presented the lowest success rate compared with the other groups (p < 0.02). No significant differences were detected among NE, E, and EU (p > 0.49). The survival rates were 97.23%, 97.30%, 78.95%, and 97.30% for NE, E, EB, and EU, respectively. Regarding postoperative sensitivity, a significant reduction was found for groups E (p = 0.027) and EU (p < 0.01) after 6 months. After 6 months, EWBT associated to the hydrophobic adhesive system had the highest failure rate. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T17:15:23Z 2019-10-06T17:15:23Z 2019-07-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052 Brazilian oral research, v. 33, p. e052-. 1807-3107 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190505 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052 S1806-83242019000100244 2-s2.0-85069267429 S1806-83242019000100244.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190505 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian oral research, v. 33, p. e052-. 1807-3107 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052 S1806-83242019000100244 2-s2.0-85069267429 S1806-83242019000100244.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian oral research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
e052 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826304217442156544 |