No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Joao V. R. S. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Saad, Joao C. C. [UNESP], Sanchez-Roman, Rodrigo M. [UNESP], Rodriguez-Sinobas, Leonor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158885
Resumo: Brazil is one of the top world producers of the staple commodity common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Irregular distribution of rainfall and the lack of rain during the crop reproductive phases affect its yield and increase the demand of water for irrigation. However, in recent years, water resources have decreased and water saving has become an issue. Thus, soil management techniques, which reduce evaporation, and efficient irrigation programming, through the monitoring of soil water content, could be adopted in water scarcity scenarios. This study assesses the effect of crop residues management (incorporated IR or left on soil surface NR) in soil water availability (and its retention in the soil pore space), and yield in common beans cultivated under no-till and directly seeded in an irrigated farm located southwest of Sao Paulo state. Soil water content was monitored with TDR probes installed within the 0-20 cm layer and its retention was assessed through the soil water retention curve. For the same irrigation management, the IR led to soil water content was lower than NR but both soil managements had similar available water and their demand of water for irrigation was similar. For the same soil water content, NR soils could hold it tightly in the pore space and the root plant system would require higher energy to absorb it. Then, it is foreseen that the root system in IR soils will be shallower than in NR soils, since it will withdraw water easily within the first 20 cm, however, in NR, the roots will extend deeper searching for available water. Considering 40 kPa as a threshold value, the plants suffered water stress during all crop cycle at the same physiologic stages in both soils. The variables studied to assess yield presented no-statistical significance in the T test at significance level of 0.05. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
id UNSP_ed2fcde2dda3cff3e0b39a2f36c1cb79
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158885
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yieldTDRCrop residuesCommon beanSoil moistureWater retentionYieldBrazil is one of the top world producers of the staple commodity common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Irregular distribution of rainfall and the lack of rain during the crop reproductive phases affect its yield and increase the demand of water for irrigation. However, in recent years, water resources have decreased and water saving has become an issue. Thus, soil management techniques, which reduce evaporation, and efficient irrigation programming, through the monitoring of soil water content, could be adopted in water scarcity scenarios. This study assesses the effect of crop residues management (incorporated IR or left on soil surface NR) in soil water availability (and its retention in the soil pore space), and yield in common beans cultivated under no-till and directly seeded in an irrigated farm located southwest of Sao Paulo state. Soil water content was monitored with TDR probes installed within the 0-20 cm layer and its retention was assessed through the soil water retention curve. For the same irrigation management, the IR led to soil water content was lower than NR but both soil managements had similar available water and their demand of water for irrigation was similar. For the same soil water content, NR soils could hold it tightly in the pore space and the root plant system would require higher energy to absorb it. Then, it is foreseen that the root system in IR soils will be shallower than in NR soils, since it will withdraw water easily within the first 20 cm, however, in NR, the roots will extend deeper searching for available water. Considering 40 kPa as a threshold value, the plants suffered water stress during all crop cycle at the same physiologic stages in both soils. The variables studied to assess yield presented no-statistical significance in the T test at significance level of 0.05. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agron Botucatu, Rua Jose Barbosa de Barros 1780,Caixa Postal 237, BR-18603970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilTech Univ Madrid, Res Grp Hydraul Irrigat, Madrid, SpainTech Univ Madrid, Agr Cultural Engn Sch, Res Grp Hydraul Irrigat, Ciudad Univ, Madrid 28040, SpainUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agron Botucatu, Rua Jose Barbosa de Barros 1780,Caixa Postal 237, BR-18603970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Tech Univ MadridSouza, Joao V. R. S. [UNESP]Saad, Joao C. C. [UNESP]Sanchez-Roman, Rodrigo M. [UNESP]Rodriguez-Sinobas, Leonor2018-11-26T15:29:40Z2018-11-26T15:29:40Z2016-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article158-166application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.002Agricultural Water Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 170, p. 158-166, 2016.0378-3774http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15888510.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.002WOS:000376550700017WOS000376550700017.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAgricultural Water Management1,272info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-17T06:14:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158885Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:58:43.450812Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield
title No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield
spellingShingle No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield
Souza, Joao V. R. S. [UNESP]
TDR
Crop residues
Common bean
Soil moisture
Water retention
Yield
title_short No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield
title_full No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield
title_fullStr No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield
title_full_unstemmed No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield
title_sort No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield
author Souza, Joao V. R. S. [UNESP]
author_facet Souza, Joao V. R. S. [UNESP]
Saad, Joao C. C. [UNESP]
Sanchez-Roman, Rodrigo M. [UNESP]
Rodriguez-Sinobas, Leonor
author_role author
author2 Saad, Joao C. C. [UNESP]
Sanchez-Roman, Rodrigo M. [UNESP]
Rodriguez-Sinobas, Leonor
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Tech Univ Madrid
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Joao V. R. S. [UNESP]
Saad, Joao C. C. [UNESP]
Sanchez-Roman, Rodrigo M. [UNESP]
Rodriguez-Sinobas, Leonor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv TDR
Crop residues
Common bean
Soil moisture
Water retention
Yield
topic TDR
Crop residues
Common bean
Soil moisture
Water retention
Yield
description Brazil is one of the top world producers of the staple commodity common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Irregular distribution of rainfall and the lack of rain during the crop reproductive phases affect its yield and increase the demand of water for irrigation. However, in recent years, water resources have decreased and water saving has become an issue. Thus, soil management techniques, which reduce evaporation, and efficient irrigation programming, through the monitoring of soil water content, could be adopted in water scarcity scenarios. This study assesses the effect of crop residues management (incorporated IR or left on soil surface NR) in soil water availability (and its retention in the soil pore space), and yield in common beans cultivated under no-till and directly seeded in an irrigated farm located southwest of Sao Paulo state. Soil water content was monitored with TDR probes installed within the 0-20 cm layer and its retention was assessed through the soil water retention curve. For the same irrigation management, the IR led to soil water content was lower than NR but both soil managements had similar available water and their demand of water for irrigation was similar. For the same soil water content, NR soils could hold it tightly in the pore space and the root plant system would require higher energy to absorb it. Then, it is foreseen that the root system in IR soils will be shallower than in NR soils, since it will withdraw water easily within the first 20 cm, however, in NR, the roots will extend deeper searching for available water. Considering 40 kPa as a threshold value, the plants suffered water stress during all crop cycle at the same physiologic stages in both soils. The variables studied to assess yield presented no-statistical significance in the T test at significance level of 0.05. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-31
2018-11-26T15:29:40Z
2018-11-26T15:29:40Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.002
Agricultural Water Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 170, p. 158-166, 2016.
0378-3774
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158885
10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.002
WOS:000376550700017
WOS000376550700017.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158885
identifier_str_mv Agricultural Water Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 170, p. 158-166, 2016.
0378-3774
10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.002
WOS:000376550700017
WOS000376550700017.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Agricultural Water Management
1,272
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 158-166
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128880727293952