Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz207 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184597 |
Resumo: | Pooling semen of multiple boars is commonly used in swine production systems. Compared with single boar systems, this technique changes family structure creating maternal half-sib families. The aim of this simulation study was to investigate how pooling semen affects the accuracy of estimating direct and maternal effects for individual piglet birth weight, in purebred pigs. Different scenarios of pooling semen were simulated by allowing the same female to mate from 1 to 6 boars, per insemination, whereas litter size was kept constant (N = 12). In each pooled boar scenario, genomic information was used to construct either the genomic relationship matrix (G) or to reconstruct pedigree in addition to G. Genotypes were generated for 60,000 SNPs evenly distributed across 18 autosomes. From the 5 simulated generations, only animals from generations 3 to 5 were genotyped (N = 36,000). Direct and maternal true breeding values (TBV) were computed as the sum of the effects of the 1,080 QTLs. Phenotypes were constructed as the sum of direct TBV, maternal TBV, an overall mean of 1.25 kg, and a residual effect. The simulated heritabilities for direct and maternal effects were 0.056 and 0.19, respectively, and the genetic correlation between both effects was -0.25. All simulations were replicated 5 times. Variance components and direct and maternal heritability were estimated using average information REML. Predictions were computed via pedigree-based BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Genotyped littermates in the last generation were used for validation. Prediction accuracies were calculated as correlations between EBV and TBV for direct (acc(direct)) and maternal (acc(mat)) effects. When boars were known, acc(direct) were 0.21 (1 boar) and 0.26 (6 boars) for BLUP, whereas for ssGBLUP, they were 0.38 (1 boar) and 0.43 (6 boars). When boars were unknown, acc(direct) was lower in BLUP but similar in ssGBLUP. For the scenario with known boars, acc(mat) was 0.58 and 0.63 for 1 and 6 boars, respectively, under ssGBLUP. For unknown boars, acc(mat) was 0.63 for 2 boars and 0.62 for 6 boars in ssGBLUP. In general, acc(direct) and acc(mat) were lower in the single-boar scenario compared with pooled semen scenarios, indicating that a half-sib structure is more adequate to estimate direct and maternal effects. Using pooled semen from multiple boars can help us to improve accuracy of predicting maternal and direct effects when maternal half-sib families are larger than 2. |
id |
UNSP_edbe5e0f69f3c12c1337de6e6eb08391 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184597 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation studygenomic predictionmaternal abilitymultiple sireprediction accuracyPooling semen of multiple boars is commonly used in swine production systems. Compared with single boar systems, this technique changes family structure creating maternal half-sib families. The aim of this simulation study was to investigate how pooling semen affects the accuracy of estimating direct and maternal effects for individual piglet birth weight, in purebred pigs. Different scenarios of pooling semen were simulated by allowing the same female to mate from 1 to 6 boars, per insemination, whereas litter size was kept constant (N = 12). In each pooled boar scenario, genomic information was used to construct either the genomic relationship matrix (G) or to reconstruct pedigree in addition to G. Genotypes were generated for 60,000 SNPs evenly distributed across 18 autosomes. From the 5 simulated generations, only animals from generations 3 to 5 were genotyped (N = 36,000). Direct and maternal true breeding values (TBV) were computed as the sum of the effects of the 1,080 QTLs. Phenotypes were constructed as the sum of direct TBV, maternal TBV, an overall mean of 1.25 kg, and a residual effect. The simulated heritabilities for direct and maternal effects were 0.056 and 0.19, respectively, and the genetic correlation between both effects was -0.25. All simulations were replicated 5 times. Variance components and direct and maternal heritability were estimated using average information REML. Predictions were computed via pedigree-based BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Genotyped littermates in the last generation were used for validation. Prediction accuracies were calculated as correlations between EBV and TBV for direct (acc(direct)) and maternal (acc(mat)) effects. When boars were known, acc(direct) were 0.21 (1 boar) and 0.26 (6 boars) for BLUP, whereas for ssGBLUP, they were 0.38 (1 boar) and 0.43 (6 boars). When boars were unknown, acc(direct) was lower in BLUP but similar in ssGBLUP. For the scenario with known boars, acc(mat) was 0.58 and 0.63 for 1 and 6 boars, respectively, under ssGBLUP. For unknown boars, acc(mat) was 0.63 for 2 boars and 0.62 for 6 boars in ssGBLUP. In general, acc(direct) and acc(mat) were lower in the single-boar scenario compared with pooled semen scenarios, indicating that a half-sib structure is more adequate to estimate direct and maternal effects. Using pooled semen from multiple boars can help us to improve accuracy of predicting maternal and direct effects when maternal half-sib families are larger than 2.Genus PIC (Hendersonville, TN)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USAWageningen Univ & Res, Anim Breeding & Genet Ctr, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, NetherlandsGenus PIC, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USASao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilCAPES: 001CAPES: 88881.131671/2016-01Oxford Univ Press IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ GeorgiaWageningen Univ & ResGenus PICMaiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP]Assen, AlulaBijma, PiterChen, Ching-YiVasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP]Herring, William O.Tsuruta, ShogoMisztal, IgnacyLourenco, Daniela A. L.2019-10-04T12:14:57Z2019-10-04T12:14:57Z2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article3237-3245http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz207Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 97, n. 8, p. 3237-3245, 2019.0021-8812http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18459710.1093/jas/skz207WOS:000477868300007Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T02:05:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184597Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:26:30.253154Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study |
title |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study |
spellingShingle |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP] genomic prediction maternal ability multiple sire prediction accuracy |
title_short |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study |
title_full |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study |
title_fullStr |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study |
title_sort |
Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study |
author |
Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP] Assen, Alula Bijma, Piter Chen, Ching-Yi Vasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP] Herring, William O. Tsuruta, Shogo Misztal, Ignacy Lourenco, Daniela A. L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Assen, Alula Bijma, Piter Chen, Ching-Yi Vasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP] Herring, William O. Tsuruta, Shogo Misztal, Ignacy Lourenco, Daniela A. L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Univ Georgia Wageningen Univ & Res Genus PIC |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maiorano, Amanda M. [UNESP] Assen, Alula Bijma, Piter Chen, Ching-Yi Vasconcelos Silva, Josineudson Augusto [UNESP] Herring, William O. Tsuruta, Shogo Misztal, Ignacy Lourenco, Daniela A. L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
genomic prediction maternal ability multiple sire prediction accuracy |
topic |
genomic prediction maternal ability multiple sire prediction accuracy |
description |
Pooling semen of multiple boars is commonly used in swine production systems. Compared with single boar systems, this technique changes family structure creating maternal half-sib families. The aim of this simulation study was to investigate how pooling semen affects the accuracy of estimating direct and maternal effects for individual piglet birth weight, in purebred pigs. Different scenarios of pooling semen were simulated by allowing the same female to mate from 1 to 6 boars, per insemination, whereas litter size was kept constant (N = 12). In each pooled boar scenario, genomic information was used to construct either the genomic relationship matrix (G) or to reconstruct pedigree in addition to G. Genotypes were generated for 60,000 SNPs evenly distributed across 18 autosomes. From the 5 simulated generations, only animals from generations 3 to 5 were genotyped (N = 36,000). Direct and maternal true breeding values (TBV) were computed as the sum of the effects of the 1,080 QTLs. Phenotypes were constructed as the sum of direct TBV, maternal TBV, an overall mean of 1.25 kg, and a residual effect. The simulated heritabilities for direct and maternal effects were 0.056 and 0.19, respectively, and the genetic correlation between both effects was -0.25. All simulations were replicated 5 times. Variance components and direct and maternal heritability were estimated using average information REML. Predictions were computed via pedigree-based BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Genotyped littermates in the last generation were used for validation. Prediction accuracies were calculated as correlations between EBV and TBV for direct (acc(direct)) and maternal (acc(mat)) effects. When boars were known, acc(direct) were 0.21 (1 boar) and 0.26 (6 boars) for BLUP, whereas for ssGBLUP, they were 0.38 (1 boar) and 0.43 (6 boars). When boars were unknown, acc(direct) was lower in BLUP but similar in ssGBLUP. For the scenario with known boars, acc(mat) was 0.58 and 0.63 for 1 and 6 boars, respectively, under ssGBLUP. For unknown boars, acc(mat) was 0.63 for 2 boars and 0.62 for 6 boars in ssGBLUP. In general, acc(direct) and acc(mat) were lower in the single-boar scenario compared with pooled semen scenarios, indicating that a half-sib structure is more adequate to estimate direct and maternal effects. Using pooled semen from multiple boars can help us to improve accuracy of predicting maternal and direct effects when maternal half-sib families are larger than 2. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-04T12:14:57Z 2019-10-04T12:14:57Z 2019-08-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz207 Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 97, n. 8, p. 3237-3245, 2019. 0021-8812 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184597 10.1093/jas/skz207 WOS:000477868300007 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz207 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184597 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 97, n. 8, p. 3237-3245, 2019. 0021-8812 10.1093/jas/skz207 WOS:000477868300007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of Animal Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
3237-3245 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129427859570688 |