Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2183 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237952 |
Resumo: | The classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation is characterized by a phase of giant impacts among Moon-to-Mars mass planetary embryos. While the classic model and its adaptations have produced adequate analogues of the outer three terrestrial planets, Mercury's origin remains elusive. Mercury's high-core mass fraction compared to the Earth's is particularly outstanding. Among collisional hypotheses, this feature has been long interpreted as the outcome of an energetic giant impact among two massive protoplanets. Here, we revisit the classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation with focus on the outcome of giant impacts. We have performed a large number of N-body simulations considering different initial distributions of planetary embryos and planetesimals. Our simulations tested the effects of different giant planet configurations, from virtually circular to very eccentric configurations. We compare the giant impacts produced in our simulations with those that are more likely to account for the formation of Mercury and the Moon according to smoothed hydrodynamic simulations. Impact events that could lead to Moon's formation are observed in all our simulations with up to similar to 20 per cent of all giant impacts, consistent with the range of the expected Moon-forming event conditions. On the other hand, Mercury-forming events via a single giant impact are extremely rare, accounting for less than similar to 1 per cent of all giant impacts. Our results suggest that producing Mercury as a remnant of a single giant impact that strips out the mantle of a differentiated planetary object with Earth-like iron-silicate ratio is challenging and alternative scenarios may be required (e.g. multiple collisions). |
id |
UNSP_eee499fe19d362bd0252bfc3d047895d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/237952 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikelyMethods: numericalProtoplanetary discsThe classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation is characterized by a phase of giant impacts among Moon-to-Mars mass planetary embryos. While the classic model and its adaptations have produced adequate analogues of the outer three terrestrial planets, Mercury's origin remains elusive. Mercury's high-core mass fraction compared to the Earth's is particularly outstanding. Among collisional hypotheses, this feature has been long interpreted as the outcome of an energetic giant impact among two massive protoplanets. Here, we revisit the classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation with focus on the outcome of giant impacts. We have performed a large number of N-body simulations considering different initial distributions of planetary embryos and planetesimals. Our simulations tested the effects of different giant planet configurations, from virtually circular to very eccentric configurations. We compare the giant impacts produced in our simulations with those that are more likely to account for the formation of Mercury and the Moon according to smoothed hydrodynamic simulations. Impact events that could lead to Moon's formation are observed in all our simulations with up to similar to 20 per cent of all giant impacts, consistent with the range of the expected Moon-forming event conditions. On the other hand, Mercury-forming events via a single giant impact are extremely rare, accounting for less than similar to 1 per cent of all giant impacts. Our results suggest that producing Mercury as a remnant of a single giant impact that strips out the mantle of a differentiated planetary object with Earth-like iron-silicate ratio is challenging and alternative scenarios may be required (e.g. multiple collisions).Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Welch FoundationNASACoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Natl Observ, BR-20921400 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilRice Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Planetary Sci, 6100 MS 126, Houston, TX 77005 USARice Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, 6100 MS 550, Houston, TX 77005 USASao Paulo State Univ, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilCtr Fed Educ Tecnol Minas Gerais CEFET, BR-35790000 Curvelo, MG, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2016/24561-0FAPESP: 2016/12686-2FAPESP: 2016/19556-7CNPq: 305210/2018-1Welch Foundation: C-2035-20200401NASA: 80NSSC18K0828CAPES: 88887.310463/2018-00CAPES: 3266Oxford Univ PressNatl ObservUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Rice UnivCtr Fed Educ Tecnol Minas Gerais CEFETFranco, P. [UNESP]Izidoro, A.Winter, O. C. [UNESP]Torres, K. S. [UNESP]Amarante, A. [UNESP]2022-11-30T16:20:34Z2022-11-30T16:20:34Z2022-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article5576-5586http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2183Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 515, n. 4, p. 5576-5586, 2022.0035-8711http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23795210.1093/mnras/stac2183WOS:000841942900024Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMonthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Societyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-02T14:29:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/237952Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:34:12.349861Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely |
title |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely |
spellingShingle |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely Franco, P. [UNESP] Methods: numerical Protoplanetary discs |
title_short |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely |
title_full |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely |
title_fullStr |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely |
title_full_unstemmed |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely |
title_sort |
Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely |
author |
Franco, P. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Franco, P. [UNESP] Izidoro, A. Winter, O. C. [UNESP] Torres, K. S. [UNESP] Amarante, A. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Izidoro, A. Winter, O. C. [UNESP] Torres, K. S. [UNESP] Amarante, A. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Natl Observ Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Rice Univ Ctr Fed Educ Tecnol Minas Gerais CEFET |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Franco, P. [UNESP] Izidoro, A. Winter, O. C. [UNESP] Torres, K. S. [UNESP] Amarante, A. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Methods: numerical Protoplanetary discs |
topic |
Methods: numerical Protoplanetary discs |
description |
The classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation is characterized by a phase of giant impacts among Moon-to-Mars mass planetary embryos. While the classic model and its adaptations have produced adequate analogues of the outer three terrestrial planets, Mercury's origin remains elusive. Mercury's high-core mass fraction compared to the Earth's is particularly outstanding. Among collisional hypotheses, this feature has been long interpreted as the outcome of an energetic giant impact among two massive protoplanets. Here, we revisit the classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation with focus on the outcome of giant impacts. We have performed a large number of N-body simulations considering different initial distributions of planetary embryos and planetesimals. Our simulations tested the effects of different giant planet configurations, from virtually circular to very eccentric configurations. We compare the giant impacts produced in our simulations with those that are more likely to account for the formation of Mercury and the Moon according to smoothed hydrodynamic simulations. Impact events that could lead to Moon's formation are observed in all our simulations with up to similar to 20 per cent of all giant impacts, consistent with the range of the expected Moon-forming event conditions. On the other hand, Mercury-forming events via a single giant impact are extremely rare, accounting for less than similar to 1 per cent of all giant impacts. Our results suggest that producing Mercury as a remnant of a single giant impact that strips out the mantle of a differentiated planetary object with Earth-like iron-silicate ratio is challenging and alternative scenarios may be required (e.g. multiple collisions). |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-30T16:20:34Z 2022-11-30T16:20:34Z 2022-08-18 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2183 Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 515, n. 4, p. 5576-5586, 2022. 0035-8711 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237952 10.1093/mnras/stac2183 WOS:000841942900024 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2183 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237952 |
identifier_str_mv |
Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 515, n. 4, p. 5576-5586, 2022. 0035-8711 10.1093/mnras/stac2183 WOS:000841942900024 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
5576-5586 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128949501296640 |