Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Franco, P. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Izidoro, A., Winter, O. C. [UNESP], Torres, K. S. [UNESP], Amarante, A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2183
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237952
Resumo: The classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation is characterized by a phase of giant impacts among Moon-to-Mars mass planetary embryos. While the classic model and its adaptations have produced adequate analogues of the outer three terrestrial planets, Mercury's origin remains elusive. Mercury's high-core mass fraction compared to the Earth's is particularly outstanding. Among collisional hypotheses, this feature has been long interpreted as the outcome of an energetic giant impact among two massive protoplanets. Here, we revisit the classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation with focus on the outcome of giant impacts. We have performed a large number of N-body simulations considering different initial distributions of planetary embryos and planetesimals. Our simulations tested the effects of different giant planet configurations, from virtually circular to very eccentric configurations. We compare the giant impacts produced in our simulations with those that are more likely to account for the formation of Mercury and the Moon according to smoothed hydrodynamic simulations. Impact events that could lead to Moon's formation are observed in all our simulations with up to similar to 20 per cent of all giant impacts, consistent with the range of the expected Moon-forming event conditions. On the other hand, Mercury-forming events via a single giant impact are extremely rare, accounting for less than similar to 1 per cent of all giant impacts. Our results suggest that producing Mercury as a remnant of a single giant impact that strips out the mantle of a differentiated planetary object with Earth-like iron-silicate ratio is challenging and alternative scenarios may be required (e.g. multiple collisions).
id UNSP_eee499fe19d362bd0252bfc3d047895d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/237952
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikelyMethods: numericalProtoplanetary discsThe classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation is characterized by a phase of giant impacts among Moon-to-Mars mass planetary embryos. While the classic model and its adaptations have produced adequate analogues of the outer three terrestrial planets, Mercury's origin remains elusive. Mercury's high-core mass fraction compared to the Earth's is particularly outstanding. Among collisional hypotheses, this feature has been long interpreted as the outcome of an energetic giant impact among two massive protoplanets. Here, we revisit the classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation with focus on the outcome of giant impacts. We have performed a large number of N-body simulations considering different initial distributions of planetary embryos and planetesimals. Our simulations tested the effects of different giant planet configurations, from virtually circular to very eccentric configurations. We compare the giant impacts produced in our simulations with those that are more likely to account for the formation of Mercury and the Moon according to smoothed hydrodynamic simulations. Impact events that could lead to Moon's formation are observed in all our simulations with up to similar to 20 per cent of all giant impacts, consistent with the range of the expected Moon-forming event conditions. On the other hand, Mercury-forming events via a single giant impact are extremely rare, accounting for less than similar to 1 per cent of all giant impacts. Our results suggest that producing Mercury as a remnant of a single giant impact that strips out the mantle of a differentiated planetary object with Earth-like iron-silicate ratio is challenging and alternative scenarios may be required (e.g. multiple collisions).Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Welch FoundationNASACoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Natl Observ, BR-20921400 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilRice Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Planetary Sci, 6100 MS 126, Houston, TX 77005 USARice Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, 6100 MS 550, Houston, TX 77005 USASao Paulo State Univ, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilCtr Fed Educ Tecnol Minas Gerais CEFET, BR-35790000 Curvelo, MG, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Dinam Orbital & Planetol, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2016/24561-0FAPESP: 2016/12686-2FAPESP: 2016/19556-7CNPq: 305210/2018-1Welch Foundation: C-2035-20200401NASA: 80NSSC18K0828CAPES: 88887.310463/2018-00CAPES: 3266Oxford Univ PressNatl ObservUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Rice UnivCtr Fed Educ Tecnol Minas Gerais CEFETFranco, P. [UNESP]Izidoro, A.Winter, O. C. [UNESP]Torres, K. S. [UNESP]Amarante, A. [UNESP]2022-11-30T16:20:34Z2022-11-30T16:20:34Z2022-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article5576-5586http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2183Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 515, n. 4, p. 5576-5586, 2022.0035-8711http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23795210.1093/mnras/stac2183WOS:000841942900024Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMonthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Societyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-02T14:29:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/237952Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:34:12.349861Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
title Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
spellingShingle Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
Franco, P. [UNESP]
Methods: numerical
Protoplanetary discs
title_short Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
title_full Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
title_fullStr Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
title_full_unstemmed Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
title_sort Explaining mercury via a single giant impact is highly unlikely
author Franco, P. [UNESP]
author_facet Franco, P. [UNESP]
Izidoro, A.
Winter, O. C. [UNESP]
Torres, K. S. [UNESP]
Amarante, A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Izidoro, A.
Winter, O. C. [UNESP]
Torres, K. S. [UNESP]
Amarante, A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Natl Observ
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Rice Univ
Ctr Fed Educ Tecnol Minas Gerais CEFET
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Franco, P. [UNESP]
Izidoro, A.
Winter, O. C. [UNESP]
Torres, K. S. [UNESP]
Amarante, A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Methods: numerical
Protoplanetary discs
topic Methods: numerical
Protoplanetary discs
description The classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation is characterized by a phase of giant impacts among Moon-to-Mars mass planetary embryos. While the classic model and its adaptations have produced adequate analogues of the outer three terrestrial planets, Mercury's origin remains elusive. Mercury's high-core mass fraction compared to the Earth's is particularly outstanding. Among collisional hypotheses, this feature has been long interpreted as the outcome of an energetic giant impact among two massive protoplanets. Here, we revisit the classical scenario of terrestrial planet formation with focus on the outcome of giant impacts. We have performed a large number of N-body simulations considering different initial distributions of planetary embryos and planetesimals. Our simulations tested the effects of different giant planet configurations, from virtually circular to very eccentric configurations. We compare the giant impacts produced in our simulations with those that are more likely to account for the formation of Mercury and the Moon according to smoothed hydrodynamic simulations. Impact events that could lead to Moon's formation are observed in all our simulations with up to similar to 20 per cent of all giant impacts, consistent with the range of the expected Moon-forming event conditions. On the other hand, Mercury-forming events via a single giant impact are extremely rare, accounting for less than similar to 1 per cent of all giant impacts. Our results suggest that producing Mercury as a remnant of a single giant impact that strips out the mantle of a differentiated planetary object with Earth-like iron-silicate ratio is challenging and alternative scenarios may be required (e.g. multiple collisions).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-30T16:20:34Z
2022-11-30T16:20:34Z
2022-08-18
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2183
Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 515, n. 4, p. 5576-5586, 2022.
0035-8711
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237952
10.1093/mnras/stac2183
WOS:000841942900024
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2183
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237952
identifier_str_mv Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 515, n. 4, p. 5576-5586, 2022.
0035-8711
10.1093/mnras/stac2183
WOS:000841942900024
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 5576-5586
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128949501296640