Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/GT2006-91090 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69225 |
Resumo: | In this paper a comparative analysis of the environmental impact caused by the use of natural gas and diesel in thermoelectric power plants utilizing combined cycle is performed. The objective is to apply a thermoeconomical analysis in order to compare the two proposed fuels. In this analysis, a new methodology that incorporates the economical engineering concept to the ecological efficiency once Cardu and Baica [1, 2], which evaluates, in general terms, the environmental impacts caused by CO2, SO2, NOx and Particulate Matter (PM), adopting as reference the air quality standards in vigour is employed. The thermoeconomic model herein proposed utilizes functional diagrams that allow the minimization the Exergetic Manufacturing Cost, which represents the cost of production of electricity incorporating the environmental impact effects to study the performance of the thermoelectric power plant [3,4], It follows that it is possible to determine the environmental impact caused by thermoelectric power plants and, under the ecological standpoint, the use of natural gas as a fuel is the best option compared to the use of the diesel, presenting ecological efficiency values of 0.944 and 0.914 respectively. From the Exergoeconomic point of view of, it was found out that the EMC (Exergetic Manufacturing Cost) is better when natural gas is used as fuel compared to the diesel fuel. Copyright © 2006 by ASME. |
id |
UNSP_f32f132bd5e85a71c45a87df0af157d5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/69225 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus dieselEcological efficiencyEnvironmental impactThermoeconomical analysisExergetic Manufacturing Cost (EMC)Diesel fuelsMathematical modelsNatural gasParticles (particulate matter)ThermoelectricityPower plantsIn this paper a comparative analysis of the environmental impact caused by the use of natural gas and diesel in thermoelectric power plants utilizing combined cycle is performed. The objective is to apply a thermoeconomical analysis in order to compare the two proposed fuels. In this analysis, a new methodology that incorporates the economical engineering concept to the ecological efficiency once Cardu and Baica [1, 2], which evaluates, in general terms, the environmental impacts caused by CO2, SO2, NOx and Particulate Matter (PM), adopting as reference the air quality standards in vigour is employed. The thermoeconomic model herein proposed utilizes functional diagrams that allow the minimization the Exergetic Manufacturing Cost, which represents the cost of production of electricity incorporating the environmental impact effects to study the performance of the thermoelectric power plant [3,4], It follows that it is possible to determine the environmental impact caused by thermoelectric power plants and, under the ecological standpoint, the use of natural gas as a fuel is the best option compared to the use of the diesel, presenting ecological efficiency values of 0.944 and 0.914 respectively. From the Exergoeconomic point of view of, it was found out that the EMC (Exergetic Manufacturing Cost) is better when natural gas is used as fuel compared to the diesel fuel. Copyright © 2006 by ASME.College of Chemical Engineering FAENQUIL, Rodovia Itajuba Lorena, s/n, km 74,5, Lorena - SP, 12600-970Energy Department São Paulo State University UNESP, Av. Dr. Ariberto Pereira Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SP, 12516-410Energy Department São Paulo State University UNESP, Av. Dr. Ariberto Pereira Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá - SP, 12516-410Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)De Castro Villela, Iraídes AparecidaSilveira, José Luz [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:22:02Z2014-05-27T11:22:02Z2006-11-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject945-951http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/GT2006-91090Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, v. 2, p. 945-951.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6922510.1115/GT2006-910902-s2.0-337508081901750154267305530Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-01T19:30:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/69225Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:18:49.054483Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel |
title |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel |
spellingShingle |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel De Castro Villela, Iraídes Aparecida Ecological efficiency Environmental impact Thermoeconomical analysis Exergetic Manufacturing Cost (EMC) Diesel fuels Mathematical models Natural gas Particles (particulate matter) Thermoelectricity Power plants |
title_short |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel |
title_full |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel |
title_fullStr |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel |
title_full_unstemmed |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel |
title_sort |
Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel |
author |
De Castro Villela, Iraídes Aparecida |
author_facet |
De Castro Villela, Iraídes Aparecida Silveira, José Luz [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silveira, José Luz [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
De Castro Villela, Iraídes Aparecida Silveira, José Luz [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ecological efficiency Environmental impact Thermoeconomical analysis Exergetic Manufacturing Cost (EMC) Diesel fuels Mathematical models Natural gas Particles (particulate matter) Thermoelectricity Power plants |
topic |
Ecological efficiency Environmental impact Thermoeconomical analysis Exergetic Manufacturing Cost (EMC) Diesel fuels Mathematical models Natural gas Particles (particulate matter) Thermoelectricity Power plants |
description |
In this paper a comparative analysis of the environmental impact caused by the use of natural gas and diesel in thermoelectric power plants utilizing combined cycle is performed. The objective is to apply a thermoeconomical analysis in order to compare the two proposed fuels. In this analysis, a new methodology that incorporates the economical engineering concept to the ecological efficiency once Cardu and Baica [1, 2], which evaluates, in general terms, the environmental impacts caused by CO2, SO2, NOx and Particulate Matter (PM), adopting as reference the air quality standards in vigour is employed. The thermoeconomic model herein proposed utilizes functional diagrams that allow the minimization the Exergetic Manufacturing Cost, which represents the cost of production of electricity incorporating the environmental impact effects to study the performance of the thermoelectric power plant [3,4], It follows that it is possible to determine the environmental impact caused by thermoelectric power plants and, under the ecological standpoint, the use of natural gas as a fuel is the best option compared to the use of the diesel, presenting ecological efficiency values of 0.944 and 0.914 respectively. From the Exergoeconomic point of view of, it was found out that the EMC (Exergetic Manufacturing Cost) is better when natural gas is used as fuel compared to the diesel fuel. Copyright © 2006 by ASME. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-11-14 2014-05-27T11:22:02Z 2014-05-27T11:22:02Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/GT2006-91090 Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, v. 2, p. 945-951. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69225 10.1115/GT2006-91090 2-s2.0-33750808190 1750154267305530 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/GT2006-91090 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69225 |
identifier_str_mv |
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, v. 2, p. 945-951. 10.1115/GT2006-91090 2-s2.0-33750808190 1750154267305530 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
945-951 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128345816170496 |