Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1564/v31_apr_07 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1564/v31_apr_07 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198778 |
Resumo: | Crop protection on major crops is now required to follow the principles of integrated pest management so the timing and accuracy of any application of a pesticide or biopesticide has to be more precise to minimize adverse effects on non-target species. The development of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) provides a means of providing a more targeted application of the correct dose, especially by using formulations that are more persistent, thus minimizing loss of spray in areas subject to rain. Avoiding use of too high a dosage allows greater survival of natural enemies and reduces the selection pressure for pests becoming resistant to specific modes of action. The downward flow of air from a UAV should also provide better distribution and impaction of droplets within a crop canopy, reduce soil impaction caused by taking heavy loads of spray applied with 200 l ha–1 of water, and allow treatments when fields are too wet to access with ground equipment. In Asia, many smallholder farmers are using a drone in preference to using a knapsack sprayer. According to Matthews, it has been shown that ULV spraying can be effective, but it needs a narrow droplet spectrum with the droplets remaining stable and not shrinking to become too small. Formulation research can reduce the volatility of the spray, hence the success of oil-based sprays. However, instead of petroleum-based oils, there is a chance to develop vegetable oil carriers with micro-sized particle suspensions to deliver low toxicity pesticides in droplets that can be deposited within the crop and not drift beyond the crop boundary. Oil deposits will be less prone to loss after rain so less should be lost in neighbouring ditches and water courses, especially as rainfall patterns are forecast to change. More studies are needed to evaluate the swath for deposition, buffer zones, formulation, nozzle selection, to guide future specific legislation for UAV applications. |
id |
UNSP_f3c4a3e984e7fca9a9837cc47841b2a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198778 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applicationsAerial sprayingCrop protectionDroplet sizePest managementSpray driftSwath widthUAVCrop protection on major crops is now required to follow the principles of integrated pest management so the timing and accuracy of any application of a pesticide or biopesticide has to be more precise to minimize adverse effects on non-target species. The development of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) provides a means of providing a more targeted application of the correct dose, especially by using formulations that are more persistent, thus minimizing loss of spray in areas subject to rain. Avoiding use of too high a dosage allows greater survival of natural enemies and reduces the selection pressure for pests becoming resistant to specific modes of action. The downward flow of air from a UAV should also provide better distribution and impaction of droplets within a crop canopy, reduce soil impaction caused by taking heavy loads of spray applied with 200 l ha–1 of water, and allow treatments when fields are too wet to access with ground equipment. In Asia, many smallholder farmers are using a drone in preference to using a knapsack sprayer. According to Matthews, it has been shown that ULV spraying can be effective, but it needs a narrow droplet spectrum with the droplets remaining stable and not shrinking to become too small. Formulation research can reduce the volatility of the spray, hence the success of oil-based sprays. However, instead of petroleum-based oils, there is a chance to develop vegetable oil carriers with micro-sized particle suspensions to deliver low toxicity pesticides in droplets that can be deposited within the crop and not drift beyond the crop boundary. Oil deposits will be less prone to loss after rain so less should be lost in neighbouring ditches and water courses, especially as rainfall patterns are forecast to change. More studies are needed to evaluate the swath for deposition, buffer zones, formulation, nozzle selection, to guide future specific legislation for UAV applications.AgroEfetivaSao Paulo State University UNESPSao Paulo State University UNESPAgroEfetivaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Carvalho, Fernando K.Chechetto, Rodolfo G.Mota, Alisson A. B.Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:21:44Z2020-12-12T01:21:44Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article83-88http://dx.doi.org/10.1564/v31_apr_07Outlooks on Pest Management, v. 31, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2020.1743-10341743-1026http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19877810.1564/v31_apr_072-s2.0-85083977918Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOutlooks on Pest Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T20:18:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198778Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:59:58.734558Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications |
title |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications |
spellingShingle |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications Carvalho, Fernando K. Aerial spraying Crop protection Droplet size Pest management Spray drift Swath width UAV Carvalho, Fernando K. Aerial spraying Crop protection Droplet size Pest management Spray drift Swath width UAV |
title_short |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications |
title_full |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications |
title_fullStr |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications |
title_sort |
Challenges of aircraft and drone spray applications |
author |
Carvalho, Fernando K. |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Fernando K. Carvalho, Fernando K. Chechetto, Rodolfo G. Mota, Alisson A. B. Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] Chechetto, Rodolfo G. Mota, Alisson A. B. Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chechetto, Rodolfo G. Mota, Alisson A. B. Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
AgroEfetiva Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Fernando K. Chechetto, Rodolfo G. Mota, Alisson A. B. Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aerial spraying Crop protection Droplet size Pest management Spray drift Swath width UAV |
topic |
Aerial spraying Crop protection Droplet size Pest management Spray drift Swath width UAV |
description |
Crop protection on major crops is now required to follow the principles of integrated pest management so the timing and accuracy of any application of a pesticide or biopesticide has to be more precise to minimize adverse effects on non-target species. The development of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) provides a means of providing a more targeted application of the correct dose, especially by using formulations that are more persistent, thus minimizing loss of spray in areas subject to rain. Avoiding use of too high a dosage allows greater survival of natural enemies and reduces the selection pressure for pests becoming resistant to specific modes of action. The downward flow of air from a UAV should also provide better distribution and impaction of droplets within a crop canopy, reduce soil impaction caused by taking heavy loads of spray applied with 200 l ha–1 of water, and allow treatments when fields are too wet to access with ground equipment. In Asia, many smallholder farmers are using a drone in preference to using a knapsack sprayer. According to Matthews, it has been shown that ULV spraying can be effective, but it needs a narrow droplet spectrum with the droplets remaining stable and not shrinking to become too small. Formulation research can reduce the volatility of the spray, hence the success of oil-based sprays. However, instead of petroleum-based oils, there is a chance to develop vegetable oil carriers with micro-sized particle suspensions to deliver low toxicity pesticides in droplets that can be deposited within the crop and not drift beyond the crop boundary. Oil deposits will be less prone to loss after rain so less should be lost in neighbouring ditches and water courses, especially as rainfall patterns are forecast to change. More studies are needed to evaluate the swath for deposition, buffer zones, formulation, nozzle selection, to guide future specific legislation for UAV applications. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T01:21:44Z 2020-12-12T01:21:44Z 2020-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1564/v31_apr_07 Outlooks on Pest Management, v. 31, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2020. 1743-1034 1743-1026 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198778 10.1564/v31_apr_07 2-s2.0-85083977918 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1564/v31_apr_07 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198778 |
identifier_str_mv |
Outlooks on Pest Management, v. 31, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2020. 1743-1034 1743-1026 10.1564/v31_apr_07 2-s2.0-85083977918 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Outlooks on Pest Management |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
83-88 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822182582031220736 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1564/v31_apr_07 |