Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Sabrina C.
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Simões, Marcello G., Kowalewski, Michałl, Petti, Mônica A. V., Nonato, Edmundo F., Martinez, Sergio, Del Rio, Claudia Julia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2008.0410
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70742
Resumo: Shells of Bouchardia rosea (Brachiopoda, Rhynchonelliformea) are abundant in Late Holocene death assemblages of the Ubatuba Bight, Brazil, SW Atlantic. This genus is also known from multiple localities in the Cenozoic fossil record of South America. A total of 1211 valves of B. rosea, 2086 shells of sympatric bivalve mollusks (14 nearshore localities ranging in depth from 0 to 30 m), 80 shells of Bouchardia zitteli, San Julián Formation, Paleogene, Argentina, and 135 shells of Bouchardia transplatina, Camacho Formation, Neogene, Uruguay were examined for bioerosion traces. All examined bouchardiid shells represent shallow-water, subtropical marine settings. Out of 1211 brachiopod shells of B. rosea, 1201 represent dead individuals. A total of 149 dead specimens displayed polychaete traces (Caulostrepsis). Live polychaetes were found inside Caulostrepsis borings in 10 life-collected brachiopods, indicating a syn-vivo interaction (Caulostrepsis traces in dead shells of B. rosea were always empty). The long and coiled peristomial palps, large chaetae on both sides of the 5th segment, and flanged pygidium found in the polychaetes are characteristic of the polychaete genus Polydora (Spionidae). The fact that 100% of the Caulostrepsis found in living brachiopods were still inhabited by the trace-making spionids, whereas none was found in dead hosts, implies active biotic interaction between the two living organisms rather than colonization of dead brachiopod shells. The absence of blisters, the lack of valve/site stereotypy, and the fact that tubes open only externally are all suggestive of a commensal relationship. These data document a new host group (bouchardiid rhynchonelliform brachiopods) with which spionids can interact (interestingly, spionid-infested sympatric bivalves have not been found in the study area despite extensive sampling). The syn-vivo interaction indicates that substantial bioerosion may occur when the host is alive. Thus, the presence of such bioerosion traces on fossil shells need not imply a prolonged post-mortem exposure of shells on the sea floor. Also, none of the Paleogene and Neogene Bouchardia species included any ichnological evidence for spionid infestation. This indicates that the Spionidae/ Bouchardia association may be geologically young, although the lack of older records may also reflect limited sampling and/or taphonomic biases.
id UNSP_f4ab5b2ed411cf7d04775e2cfbfd12e7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/70742
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implicationsBioerosionBiotic interactionBouchardiaBrachiopodaBrazilCaulostrepsisCenozoicSpionidaeabundancebioerosionbiotic factorbrachiopodevolutionfossil assemblagefossil recordichnologypaleoecologyPaleogenepolychaeteseafloortaphonomyArgentinaSouth AmericaUruguayBivalviaBouchardia roseaBouchardia zitteliMolluscaPolychaetaPolydoraPygidiumRhynchonelliformeaSpionidaShells of Bouchardia rosea (Brachiopoda, Rhynchonelliformea) are abundant in Late Holocene death assemblages of the Ubatuba Bight, Brazil, SW Atlantic. This genus is also known from multiple localities in the Cenozoic fossil record of South America. A total of 1211 valves of B. rosea, 2086 shells of sympatric bivalve mollusks (14 nearshore localities ranging in depth from 0 to 30 m), 80 shells of Bouchardia zitteli, San Julián Formation, Paleogene, Argentina, and 135 shells of Bouchardia transplatina, Camacho Formation, Neogene, Uruguay were examined for bioerosion traces. All examined bouchardiid shells represent shallow-water, subtropical marine settings. Out of 1211 brachiopod shells of B. rosea, 1201 represent dead individuals. A total of 149 dead specimens displayed polychaete traces (Caulostrepsis). Live polychaetes were found inside Caulostrepsis borings in 10 life-collected brachiopods, indicating a syn-vivo interaction (Caulostrepsis traces in dead shells of B. rosea were always empty). The long and coiled peristomial palps, large chaetae on both sides of the 5th segment, and flanged pygidium found in the polychaetes are characteristic of the polychaete genus Polydora (Spionidae). The fact that 100% of the Caulostrepsis found in living brachiopods were still inhabited by the trace-making spionids, whereas none was found in dead hosts, implies active biotic interaction between the two living organisms rather than colonization of dead brachiopod shells. The absence of blisters, the lack of valve/site stereotypy, and the fact that tubes open only externally are all suggestive of a commensal relationship. These data document a new host group (bouchardiid rhynchonelliform brachiopods) with which spionids can interact (interestingly, spionid-infested sympatric bivalves have not been found in the study area despite extensive sampling). The syn-vivo interaction indicates that substantial bioerosion may occur when the host is alive. Thus, the presence of such bioerosion traces on fossil shells need not imply a prolonged post-mortem exposure of shells on the sea floor. Also, none of the Paleogene and Neogene Bouchardia species included any ichnological evidence for spionid infestation. This indicates that the Spionidae/ Bouchardia association may be geologically young, although the lack of older records may also reflect limited sampling and/or taphonomic biases.Departamento de Zoologia Instituto de Biociências Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/n CxP 510, 18618-000 Botucatu, SPDepartment of Geosciences Virginia Polytechnic Institute State University Blacksburg, Blacksburg, VADepartamento de Oceanografia Biologica Instituto Oceanografico, Praça do Oceanográfico 191, 05508-120 São Paulo, SPFacultad de Ciencias, Inguá 4225, 11400 MontevideoMuseo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia División Paleoinvertebrados, Angel Gallardo 470, Buenos AiresUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)State University BlacksburgUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidad de Montevideo (UM)Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino RivadaviaRodrigues, Sabrina C.Simões, Marcello G.Kowalewski, MichałlPetti, Mônica A. V.Nonato, Edmundo F.Martinez, SergioDel Rio, Claudia Julia2014-05-27T11:23:45Z2014-05-27T11:23:45Z2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article657-668application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2008.0410Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 53, n. 4, p. 657-668, 2008.0567-79201732-2421http://hdl.handle.net/11449/7074210.4202/app.2008.04102-s2.0-595491048222-s2.0-59549104822.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Palaeontologica Polonica1.8870,788info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-21T06:12:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/70742Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:20:30.982406Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications
title Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications
spellingShingle Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications
Rodrigues, Sabrina C.
Bioerosion
Biotic interaction
Bouchardia
Brachiopoda
Brazil
Caulostrepsis
Cenozoic
Spionidae
abundance
bioerosion
biotic factor
brachiopod
evolution
fossil assemblage
fossil record
ichnology
paleoecology
Paleogene
polychaete
seafloor
taphonomy
Argentina
South America
Uruguay
Bivalvia
Bouchardia rosea
Bouchardia zitteli
Mollusca
Polychaeta
Polydora
Pygidium
Rhynchonelliformea
Spionida
title_short Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications
title_full Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications
title_fullStr Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications
title_full_unstemmed Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications
title_sort Biotic interaction between spionid polychaetes and bouchardiid brachiopods: Paleoecological, taphonomic and evolutionary implications
author Rodrigues, Sabrina C.
author_facet Rodrigues, Sabrina C.
Simões, Marcello G.
Kowalewski, Michałl
Petti, Mônica A. V.
Nonato, Edmundo F.
Martinez, Sergio
Del Rio, Claudia Julia
author_role author
author2 Simões, Marcello G.
Kowalewski, Michałl
Petti, Mônica A. V.
Nonato, Edmundo F.
Martinez, Sergio
Del Rio, Claudia Julia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
State University Blacksburg
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidad de Montevideo (UM)
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Sabrina C.
Simões, Marcello G.
Kowalewski, Michałl
Petti, Mônica A. V.
Nonato, Edmundo F.
Martinez, Sergio
Del Rio, Claudia Julia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bioerosion
Biotic interaction
Bouchardia
Brachiopoda
Brazil
Caulostrepsis
Cenozoic
Spionidae
abundance
bioerosion
biotic factor
brachiopod
evolution
fossil assemblage
fossil record
ichnology
paleoecology
Paleogene
polychaete
seafloor
taphonomy
Argentina
South America
Uruguay
Bivalvia
Bouchardia rosea
Bouchardia zitteli
Mollusca
Polychaeta
Polydora
Pygidium
Rhynchonelliformea
Spionida
topic Bioerosion
Biotic interaction
Bouchardia
Brachiopoda
Brazil
Caulostrepsis
Cenozoic
Spionidae
abundance
bioerosion
biotic factor
brachiopod
evolution
fossil assemblage
fossil record
ichnology
paleoecology
Paleogene
polychaete
seafloor
taphonomy
Argentina
South America
Uruguay
Bivalvia
Bouchardia rosea
Bouchardia zitteli
Mollusca
Polychaeta
Polydora
Pygidium
Rhynchonelliformea
Spionida
description Shells of Bouchardia rosea (Brachiopoda, Rhynchonelliformea) are abundant in Late Holocene death assemblages of the Ubatuba Bight, Brazil, SW Atlantic. This genus is also known from multiple localities in the Cenozoic fossil record of South America. A total of 1211 valves of B. rosea, 2086 shells of sympatric bivalve mollusks (14 nearshore localities ranging in depth from 0 to 30 m), 80 shells of Bouchardia zitteli, San Julián Formation, Paleogene, Argentina, and 135 shells of Bouchardia transplatina, Camacho Formation, Neogene, Uruguay were examined for bioerosion traces. All examined bouchardiid shells represent shallow-water, subtropical marine settings. Out of 1211 brachiopod shells of B. rosea, 1201 represent dead individuals. A total of 149 dead specimens displayed polychaete traces (Caulostrepsis). Live polychaetes were found inside Caulostrepsis borings in 10 life-collected brachiopods, indicating a syn-vivo interaction (Caulostrepsis traces in dead shells of B. rosea were always empty). The long and coiled peristomial palps, large chaetae on both sides of the 5th segment, and flanged pygidium found in the polychaetes are characteristic of the polychaete genus Polydora (Spionidae). The fact that 100% of the Caulostrepsis found in living brachiopods were still inhabited by the trace-making spionids, whereas none was found in dead hosts, implies active biotic interaction between the two living organisms rather than colonization of dead brachiopod shells. The absence of blisters, the lack of valve/site stereotypy, and the fact that tubes open only externally are all suggestive of a commensal relationship. These data document a new host group (bouchardiid rhynchonelliform brachiopods) with which spionids can interact (interestingly, spionid-infested sympatric bivalves have not been found in the study area despite extensive sampling). The syn-vivo interaction indicates that substantial bioerosion may occur when the host is alive. Thus, the presence of such bioerosion traces on fossil shells need not imply a prolonged post-mortem exposure of shells on the sea floor. Also, none of the Paleogene and Neogene Bouchardia species included any ichnological evidence for spionid infestation. This indicates that the Spionidae/ Bouchardia association may be geologically young, although the lack of older records may also reflect limited sampling and/or taphonomic biases.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
2014-05-27T11:23:45Z
2014-05-27T11:23:45Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2008.0410
Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 53, n. 4, p. 657-668, 2008.
0567-7920
1732-2421
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70742
10.4202/app.2008.0410
2-s2.0-59549104822
2-s2.0-59549104822.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2008.0410
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70742
identifier_str_mv Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 53, n. 4, p. 657-668, 2008.
0567-7920
1732-2421
10.4202/app.2008.0410
2-s2.0-59549104822
2-s2.0-59549104822.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
1.887
0,788
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 657-668
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128921857687552