Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/882 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70907 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to identify the resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus strains, in relation to induced clindamycin resistance, and to detect oxacillin resistance by the routine phenotypic methods. The strains were isolated from nasal or lingual swabs taken from healthy adult carriers with no medical history of hospitalization or antibiotic treatment. Eighteen strains were distinguished by the different patterns generated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Four (22.2%) of these showed sensitivity to clindamycin by the conventional antibacterial susceptibility test, but demonstrated inducible resistance to it by the D-test. One strain (5.6%) was characterized as borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (BORSA), and another (5.6%) as CA MRSA (community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). Both of these strains were shown to be cefoxitin susceptible by the disk diffusion test. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) failed to detect the mecA gene in this last strain and it was thus classified as BORSA. These results show the importance of incorporating the D-test into the routine lab tests for S. aureus inducible clindamycin resistance and also of including the cefoxitin resistance test among the phenotypic methods for MRSA characterization. |
id |
UNSP_f59183ecd14f4fc49b5882eeac5e2f3c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/70907 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio?Identification of drug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A challenge?ClindamycinMRSAPhenotypic identificationStaphylococcus aureusamoxicillin plus clavulanic acidcefoxitinclindamycinerythromycinoxacillinpenicillin Gadultantibiotic resistanceantibiotic therapybacterial genebacterial strainbacterium isolationclinical articledisk diffusionhospitalizationhumanlaboratory testmethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureusnonhumannormal humannose smearphenotypepolymerase chain reactionpulsed field gel electrophoresistongueThe aim of this study was to identify the resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus strains, in relation to induced clindamycin resistance, and to detect oxacillin resistance by the routine phenotypic methods. The strains were isolated from nasal or lingual swabs taken from healthy adult carriers with no medical history of hospitalization or antibiotic treatment. Eighteen strains were distinguished by the different patterns generated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Four (22.2%) of these showed sensitivity to clindamycin by the conventional antibacterial susceptibility test, but demonstrated inducible resistance to it by the D-test. One strain (5.6%) was characterized as borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (BORSA), and another (5.6%) as CA MRSA (community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). Both of these strains were shown to be cefoxitin susceptible by the disk diffusion test. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) failed to detect the mecA gene in this last strain and it was thus classified as BORSA. These results show the importance of incorporating the D-test into the routine lab tests for S. aureus inducible clindamycin resistance and also of including the cefoxitin resistance test among the phenotypic methods for MRSA characterization.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o perfil de resistência de cepas de Staphylococcus aureus, com diferentes padrões de eletroforese em campo pulsado (PFGE), em relação à resistência induzida à clindamicina e caracterizar cepas resistentes à oxacilina por testes fenotípicos. Do total de 18 cepas diferenciadas por PFGE, isoladas dos sítios nasais ou linguais de portadores adultos saudáveis, sem doença de base, sem histórico de uso de antibióticos e internações hospitalares, quatro (22,2%) apresentaram sensibilidade à clindamicina no antibiograma convencional, mas demonstraram resistência no D-teste; uma cepa (5,6%) foi caracterizada como BORSA (borderline) em relação à resistência a oxacilina e outra (5,6%) CA MRSA (S.aureus meticilina/oxacilina resistente associado à comunidade), ambas sensíveis à cefoxitina pelo teste de disco difusão. A caracterização molecular pela reação em cadeia para polimerase (PCR) da cepa identificada fenotipicamente como CA MRSA não revelou a presença do gene mecA, indicando tratar-se de cepa BORSA. Estes resultados apontam a importância do emprego rotineiro do D-teste como ferramenta para a determinação da resistência do tipo induzida à clindamicina, bem como para a importância da inclusão do teste de resistência à cefoxitina entre os métodos fenotípicos para caracterização de MRSA. Palavras-chave: Staphylococcus aureus. Caracterização fenotípica. D-teste. MRSA.Departamento de Análises Clínicas Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Expedicionários do Brasil, 1621, CEP.14801-902 - Araraquara - SPDepartamento de Análises Clínicas Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Expedicionários do Brasil, 1621, CEP.14801-902 - Araraquara - SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Colli, V. C. [UNESP]Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]Raddi, Maria Stella Gonçalves [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:23:51Z2014-05-27T11:23:51Z2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article115-118application/pdfhttp://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/882Revista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas Basica e Aplicada, v. 30, n. 1, p. 115-118, 2009.1808-45322179-443Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/709072-s2.0-779544833482-s2.0-77954483348.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada0,131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-21T15:18:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/70907Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:14:58.632615Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio? Identification of drug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A challenge? |
title |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio? |
spellingShingle |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio? Colli, V. C. [UNESP] Clindamycin MRSA Phenotypic identification Staphylococcus aureus amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid cefoxitin clindamycin erythromycin oxacillin penicillin G adult antibiotic resistance antibiotic therapy bacterial gene bacterial strain bacterium isolation clinical article disk diffusion hospitalization human laboratory test methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nonhuman normal human nose smear phenotype polymerase chain reaction pulsed field gel electrophoresis tongue |
title_short |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio? |
title_full |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio? |
title_fullStr |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio? |
title_sort |
Determinação da resistência de Staphylococcus aureus: Um desafio? |
author |
Colli, V. C. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Colli, V. C. [UNESP] Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Raddi, Maria Stella Gonçalves [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Raddi, Maria Stella Gonçalves [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Colli, V. C. [UNESP] Pizzolitto, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Raddi, Maria Stella Gonçalves [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Clindamycin MRSA Phenotypic identification Staphylococcus aureus amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid cefoxitin clindamycin erythromycin oxacillin penicillin G adult antibiotic resistance antibiotic therapy bacterial gene bacterial strain bacterium isolation clinical article disk diffusion hospitalization human laboratory test methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nonhuman normal human nose smear phenotype polymerase chain reaction pulsed field gel electrophoresis tongue |
topic |
Clindamycin MRSA Phenotypic identification Staphylococcus aureus amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid cefoxitin clindamycin erythromycin oxacillin penicillin G adult antibiotic resistance antibiotic therapy bacterial gene bacterial strain bacterium isolation clinical article disk diffusion hospitalization human laboratory test methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nonhuman normal human nose smear phenotype polymerase chain reaction pulsed field gel electrophoresis tongue |
description |
The aim of this study was to identify the resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus strains, in relation to induced clindamycin resistance, and to detect oxacillin resistance by the routine phenotypic methods. The strains were isolated from nasal or lingual swabs taken from healthy adult carriers with no medical history of hospitalization or antibiotic treatment. Eighteen strains were distinguished by the different patterns generated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Four (22.2%) of these showed sensitivity to clindamycin by the conventional antibacterial susceptibility test, but demonstrated inducible resistance to it by the D-test. One strain (5.6%) was characterized as borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (BORSA), and another (5.6%) as CA MRSA (community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). Both of these strains were shown to be cefoxitin susceptible by the disk diffusion test. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) failed to detect the mecA gene in this last strain and it was thus classified as BORSA. These results show the importance of incorporating the D-test into the routine lab tests for S. aureus inducible clindamycin resistance and also of including the cefoxitin resistance test among the phenotypic methods for MRSA characterization. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 2014-05-27T11:23:51Z 2014-05-27T11:23:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/882 Revista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas Basica e Aplicada, v. 30, n. 1, p. 115-118, 2009. 1808-4532 2179-443X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70907 2-s2.0-77954483348 2-s2.0-77954483348.pdf |
url |
http://serv-bib.fcfar.unesp.br/seer/index.php/Cien_Farm/article/view/882 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70907 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas Basica e Aplicada, v. 30, n. 1, p. 115-118, 2009. 1808-4532 2179-443X 2-s2.0-77954483348 2-s2.0-77954483348.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada 0,131 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
115-118 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129042122014720 |