Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Ito, L. A. [UNESP], Charlo, H. C O [UNESP], Castoldi, R. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www.actahort.org/books/771/771_26.htm
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70778
Resumo: Twelve rootstocks were evaluated: 1) pumpkin 'Big Power' (Cucurbita ntoschata); 2) pumpkin 'Seca' (Cucurbita moschata); 3) bottle gourd 'Longa' (Lagenaria siceraria); 4) 'Cachi' (Lagenaria siceraria); 5) bottle gourd 'Marimba' (Lagenaria siceraria); 6) 'Mogango' (Cucurbita maxima); 7) pumpkin 'Kirameki' (Cucurbita moschata); 8) pumpkin 'Caravela' (Cucurbita moschata); 9) pumpkin 'Shelper' (Cucurbita moschata); 10) 'Gherkin' (Cucumis anguria); 11) 'Loofah' (Luffa cylindrica); and 12) pumpkin 'Goianinha' (Cucurbita moschata) with respect to compatibility with melon yield, and the production and quality of fruits from cv. Bônus No. 2, non-grafted and grafted with 9 of these rootstocks (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11). The bottle gourd 'Marimba' provided the highest percentage of grafting success between the vine and rootstock. The rootstocks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 did not differ from bottle gourd 'Marimba', therefore also indicating good compatibility with the melon cv. Bônus No. 2. For height of the plants, it was shown in the first evaluation that rootstock 5 produced a greater height of the plant, differing only from rootstocks 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 and non-grafted cv. Bônus No. 2. In the second evaluation, 'Big Power' showed the greatest value for height of the plant, differing only from combinations with 'Cachi', 'Mogango', 'Shelper' and 'Loofah'. With regard to number of leaves, in the first evaluation rootstocks 3, 4 and 6 had the greatest number of leaves, but in the second 4, 9 and 11 had the greatest. For dry weight of the stem, the greatest value was obtained with 'Mogango' in the first evaluation and with 'Big Power' in the second. For leaf area of the plants, a difference was found among the treatments only in the first evaluation, where the combination with bottle gourd 'Longa' showed a greater leaf area, but did not differ from the combinations with rootstocks 1, 4, 5 and 6. Differences were demonstrated among the treatments only for the transverse diameter of the fruit, where the combination with rootstock bottle gourd 'Marimba' showed the greatest value, differing only from the combination with 'Gherkin'. There were no significant differences for the mean longitudinal diameter, pulp thickness and total soluble solids among the treatments studied.
id UNSP_f84d8fb44b7fcc9a9643743cc7977492
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/70778
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on productionCucumis meloDidymella bryoniaeProductionRootstocksCitrullus colocynthisCucumisCucumis anguriaCucurbitaCucurbita maximaCucurbita moschataLagenaria sicerariaLuffaLuffa aegyptiacaTwelve rootstocks were evaluated: 1) pumpkin 'Big Power' (Cucurbita ntoschata); 2) pumpkin 'Seca' (Cucurbita moschata); 3) bottle gourd 'Longa' (Lagenaria siceraria); 4) 'Cachi' (Lagenaria siceraria); 5) bottle gourd 'Marimba' (Lagenaria siceraria); 6) 'Mogango' (Cucurbita maxima); 7) pumpkin 'Kirameki' (Cucurbita moschata); 8) pumpkin 'Caravela' (Cucurbita moschata); 9) pumpkin 'Shelper' (Cucurbita moschata); 10) 'Gherkin' (Cucumis anguria); 11) 'Loofah' (Luffa cylindrica); and 12) pumpkin 'Goianinha' (Cucurbita moschata) with respect to compatibility with melon yield, and the production and quality of fruits from cv. Bônus No. 2, non-grafted and grafted with 9 of these rootstocks (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11). The bottle gourd 'Marimba' provided the highest percentage of grafting success between the vine and rootstock. The rootstocks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 did not differ from bottle gourd 'Marimba', therefore also indicating good compatibility with the melon cv. Bônus No. 2. For height of the plants, it was shown in the first evaluation that rootstock 5 produced a greater height of the plant, differing only from rootstocks 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 and non-grafted cv. Bônus No. 2. In the second evaluation, 'Big Power' showed the greatest value for height of the plant, differing only from combinations with 'Cachi', 'Mogango', 'Shelper' and 'Loofah'. With regard to number of leaves, in the first evaluation rootstocks 3, 4 and 6 had the greatest number of leaves, but in the second 4, 9 and 11 had the greatest. For dry weight of the stem, the greatest value was obtained with 'Mogango' in the first evaluation and with 'Big Power' in the second. For leaf area of the plants, a difference was found among the treatments only in the first evaluation, where the combination with bottle gourd 'Longa' showed a greater leaf area, but did not differ from the combinations with rootstocks 1, 4, 5 and 6. Differences were demonstrated among the treatments only for the transverse diameter of the fruit, where the combination with rootstock bottle gourd 'Marimba' showed the greatest value, differing only from the combination with 'Gherkin'. There were no significant differences for the mean longitudinal diameter, pulp thickness and total soluble solids among the treatments studied.Departamento de Produção Vegetal Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal-São Paulo SatateDepartamento de Produção Vegetal Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal-São Paulo SatateUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Braz, L. T. [UNESP]Ito, L. A. [UNESP]Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]Castoldi, R. [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:23:46Z2014-05-27T11:23:46Z2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject175-180http://www.actahort.org/books/771/771_26.htmActa Horticulturae, v. 771, p. 175-180.0567-7572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70778WOS:0002613311000262-s2.0-58149133514Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Horticulturae0,198info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T13:58:07Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/70778Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:30:15.339303Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production
title Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production
spellingShingle Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production
Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Cucumis melo
Didymella bryoniae
Production
Rootstocks
Citrullus colocynthis
Cucumis
Cucumis anguria
Cucurbita
Cucurbita maxima
Cucurbita moschata
Lagenaria siceraria
Luffa
Luffa aegyptiaca
title_short Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production
title_full Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production
title_fullStr Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production
title_full_unstemmed Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production
title_sort Compatibility of grafting in the melon cv. bônus No. 2, and effects on production
author Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
author_facet Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Ito, L. A. [UNESP]
Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]
Castoldi, R. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Ito, L. A. [UNESP]
Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]
Castoldi, R. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Ito, L. A. [UNESP]
Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]
Castoldi, R. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cucumis melo
Didymella bryoniae
Production
Rootstocks
Citrullus colocynthis
Cucumis
Cucumis anguria
Cucurbita
Cucurbita maxima
Cucurbita moschata
Lagenaria siceraria
Luffa
Luffa aegyptiaca
topic Cucumis melo
Didymella bryoniae
Production
Rootstocks
Citrullus colocynthis
Cucumis
Cucumis anguria
Cucurbita
Cucurbita maxima
Cucurbita moschata
Lagenaria siceraria
Luffa
Luffa aegyptiaca
description Twelve rootstocks were evaluated: 1) pumpkin 'Big Power' (Cucurbita ntoschata); 2) pumpkin 'Seca' (Cucurbita moschata); 3) bottle gourd 'Longa' (Lagenaria siceraria); 4) 'Cachi' (Lagenaria siceraria); 5) bottle gourd 'Marimba' (Lagenaria siceraria); 6) 'Mogango' (Cucurbita maxima); 7) pumpkin 'Kirameki' (Cucurbita moschata); 8) pumpkin 'Caravela' (Cucurbita moschata); 9) pumpkin 'Shelper' (Cucurbita moschata); 10) 'Gherkin' (Cucumis anguria); 11) 'Loofah' (Luffa cylindrica); and 12) pumpkin 'Goianinha' (Cucurbita moschata) with respect to compatibility with melon yield, and the production and quality of fruits from cv. Bônus No. 2, non-grafted and grafted with 9 of these rootstocks (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11). The bottle gourd 'Marimba' provided the highest percentage of grafting success between the vine and rootstock. The rootstocks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 did not differ from bottle gourd 'Marimba', therefore also indicating good compatibility with the melon cv. Bônus No. 2. For height of the plants, it was shown in the first evaluation that rootstock 5 produced a greater height of the plant, differing only from rootstocks 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 and non-grafted cv. Bônus No. 2. In the second evaluation, 'Big Power' showed the greatest value for height of the plant, differing only from combinations with 'Cachi', 'Mogango', 'Shelper' and 'Loofah'. With regard to number of leaves, in the first evaluation rootstocks 3, 4 and 6 had the greatest number of leaves, but in the second 4, 9 and 11 had the greatest. For dry weight of the stem, the greatest value was obtained with 'Mogango' in the first evaluation and with 'Big Power' in the second. For leaf area of the plants, a difference was found among the treatments only in the first evaluation, where the combination with bottle gourd 'Longa' showed a greater leaf area, but did not differ from the combinations with rootstocks 1, 4, 5 and 6. Differences were demonstrated among the treatments only for the transverse diameter of the fruit, where the combination with rootstock bottle gourd 'Marimba' showed the greatest value, differing only from the combination with 'Gherkin'. There were no significant differences for the mean longitudinal diameter, pulp thickness and total soluble solids among the treatments studied.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
2014-05-27T11:23:46Z
2014-05-27T11:23:46Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.actahort.org/books/771/771_26.htm
Acta Horticulturae, v. 771, p. 175-180.
0567-7572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70778
WOS:000261331100026
2-s2.0-58149133514
url http://www.actahort.org/books/771/771_26.htm
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70778
identifier_str_mv Acta Horticulturae, v. 771, p. 175-180.
0567-7572
WOS:000261331100026
2-s2.0-58149133514
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Horticulturae
0,198
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 175-180
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128522299899904