Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09732-7 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197870 |
Resumo: | The Open Dialogue approach was developed in Finland in the 1980s as a form of psychotherapy and a way to organize mental health systems. It has been adapted and implemented in several countries in recent years. This qualitative study sought to explore staff and developers' experiences with one adaptation of the Open Dialogue approach in the state of Vermont called the Collaborative Network Approach. In total twenty two staff members from two agencies participated in focus groups and three developers of the approach were interviewed. Three dominant topics emerged in the analysis process: impact of training; buy-in across levels; and shift in organizational culture. Findings revealed that 1) participants experienced the Collaborative Network Approach as positively impacting their clinical work, relationship with clients and families, and with colleagues; 2) buy-in across levels - colleagues, management and department of mental health - was perceived as crucial to the development and implementation of the approach; 3) the main challenges to full implementation were: inadequate billing structures, costly and lengthy training, and resistance to shift organizational culture to integrate the Collaborative Network Approach into agencies. We hope to have contributed to the field in a way that will support further efforts to develop and implement Open Dialogue-informed approaches by pointing to potential successes and challenges future program developers may face. |
id |
UNSP_f879c32ce548cd71bbe4de89bb6caf8d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/197870 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and ImplementedOpen dialogueQualitative researchPsychosisMental healthThe Open Dialogue approach was developed in Finland in the 1980s as a form of psychotherapy and a way to organize mental health systems. It has been adapted and implemented in several countries in recent years. This qualitative study sought to explore staff and developers' experiences with one adaptation of the Open Dialogue approach in the state of Vermont called the Collaborative Network Approach. In total twenty two staff members from two agencies participated in focus groups and three developers of the approach were interviewed. Three dominant topics emerged in the analysis process: impact of training; buy-in across levels; and shift in organizational culture. Findings revealed that 1) participants experienced the Collaborative Network Approach as positively impacting their clinical work, relationship with clients and families, and with colleagues; 2) buy-in across levels - colleagues, management and department of mental health - was perceived as crucial to the development and implementation of the approach; 3) the main challenges to full implementation were: inadequate billing structures, costly and lengthy training, and resistance to shift organizational culture to integrate the Collaborative Network Approach into agencies. We hope to have contributed to the field in a way that will support further efforts to develop and implement Open Dialogue-informed approaches by pointing to potential successes and challenges future program developers may face.Yale Univ, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT 06520 USAState Univ Sao Paulo, Assis, SP, BrazilState Univ Sao Paulo, Assis, SP, BrazilSpringerYale UnivUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Florence, Ana CarolinaJordan, GeraldYasui, Silvio [UNESP]Davidson, Larry2020-12-11T22:56:48Z2020-12-11T22:56:48Z2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article681-693http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09732-7Psychiatric Quarterly. New York: Springer, v. 91, n. 3, p. 681-693, 2020.0033-2720http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19787010.1007/s11126-020-09732-7WOS:000555486300005Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPsychiatric Quarterlyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-14T19:10:36Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/197870Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:07:22.809593Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented |
title |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented |
spellingShingle |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented Florence, Ana Carolina Open dialogue Qualitative research Psychosis Mental health |
title_short |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented |
title_full |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented |
title_fullStr |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented |
title_sort |
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented |
author |
Florence, Ana Carolina |
author_facet |
Florence, Ana Carolina Jordan, Gerald Yasui, Silvio [UNESP] Davidson, Larry |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jordan, Gerald Yasui, Silvio [UNESP] Davidson, Larry |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Yale Univ Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Florence, Ana Carolina Jordan, Gerald Yasui, Silvio [UNESP] Davidson, Larry |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Open dialogue Qualitative research Psychosis Mental health |
topic |
Open dialogue Qualitative research Psychosis Mental health |
description |
The Open Dialogue approach was developed in Finland in the 1980s as a form of psychotherapy and a way to organize mental health systems. It has been adapted and implemented in several countries in recent years. This qualitative study sought to explore staff and developers' experiences with one adaptation of the Open Dialogue approach in the state of Vermont called the Collaborative Network Approach. In total twenty two staff members from two agencies participated in focus groups and three developers of the approach were interviewed. Three dominant topics emerged in the analysis process: impact of training; buy-in across levels; and shift in organizational culture. Findings revealed that 1) participants experienced the Collaborative Network Approach as positively impacting their clinical work, relationship with clients and families, and with colleagues; 2) buy-in across levels - colleagues, management and department of mental health - was perceived as crucial to the development and implementation of the approach; 3) the main challenges to full implementation were: inadequate billing structures, costly and lengthy training, and resistance to shift organizational culture to integrate the Collaborative Network Approach into agencies. We hope to have contributed to the field in a way that will support further efforts to develop and implement Open Dialogue-informed approaches by pointing to potential successes and challenges future program developers may face. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-11T22:56:48Z 2020-12-11T22:56:48Z 2020-09-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09732-7 Psychiatric Quarterly. New York: Springer, v. 91, n. 3, p. 681-693, 2020. 0033-2720 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197870 10.1007/s11126-020-09732-7 WOS:000555486300005 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09732-7 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197870 |
identifier_str_mv |
Psychiatric Quarterly. New York: Springer, v. 91, n. 3, p. 681-693, 2020. 0033-2720 10.1007/s11126-020-09732-7 WOS:000555486300005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychiatric Quarterly |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
681-693 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128758247325696 |