Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Custodio, Leticia [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Prados, Laura Franco, Yiannikouris, Alexandros, Holder, Vaughn, Pettigrew, James, Kuritza, Leandro, Resende, Flavio Dutra de [UNESP], Siqueira, Gustavo Rezende [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
DOI: 10.1590/rbz4820190079
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820190079
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196389
Resumo: The objective of this survey was to identify what mycotoxins were present in ingredients used in diets offered to beef cattle in feedlots and their concentrations. The survey covered 30 Brazilian feedlots located in the five major beef-producing states. Samples of total mixed ration (TMR) and ingredients were collected and analyzed for mycotoxin using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Mycotoxin concentrations were further interpreted according to known species-specific sensitivities and normalized according to the principles of toxic equivalent factors (risk equivalent quantities - REQ) expressed in mu g kg(-1) of aflatoxin B1-equivalent. Forty percent of the visited feedlots had apparent fungi in TMR. However, only one feedlot (3%) used a mycotoxin adsorbent. On the other hand, diets with high contamination presented no apparent fungi. One hundred percent of TMR was contaminated. All samples presented at least one mycotoxin contamination, with 65.5% considered low contamination, 27.6% medium contamination, and 6.90% high contamination. The toxins identified in TMR were fumonisins (most frequently), trichothecenes A, trichothecenes B, fusaric acid, aflatoxins, and ergot (mean concentration values: 2,330, 104.3, 79.5, 105, 10.5, and 5.5 mu g kg(-1), respectively). According to the contamination of TMR samples per region, Mato Grosso do Sul state presented the highest contaminations. Peanut meal was the most contaminated ingredient. One hundred percent of TMR in Brazilian feedlot is contaminated. Fumonisins were the mycotoxin most frequent and at highest concentrations in TMR samples. Moreover, mycotoxin concentrations have a distinct pattern among ingredients, TMR, and feedlots (local).
id UNSP_fa36a4596f366d58bd8c367f912bb1b1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/196389
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlotaflatoxinbeef cattlefeedlotsfumonisiningredientsThe objective of this survey was to identify what mycotoxins were present in ingredients used in diets offered to beef cattle in feedlots and their concentrations. The survey covered 30 Brazilian feedlots located in the five major beef-producing states. Samples of total mixed ration (TMR) and ingredients were collected and analyzed for mycotoxin using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Mycotoxin concentrations were further interpreted according to known species-specific sensitivities and normalized according to the principles of toxic equivalent factors (risk equivalent quantities - REQ) expressed in mu g kg(-1) of aflatoxin B1-equivalent. Forty percent of the visited feedlots had apparent fungi in TMR. However, only one feedlot (3%) used a mycotoxin adsorbent. On the other hand, diets with high contamination presented no apparent fungi. One hundred percent of TMR was contaminated. All samples presented at least one mycotoxin contamination, with 65.5% considered low contamination, 27.6% medium contamination, and 6.90% high contamination. The toxins identified in TMR were fumonisins (most frequently), trichothecenes A, trichothecenes B, fusaric acid, aflatoxins, and ergot (mean concentration values: 2,330, 104.3, 79.5, 105, 10.5, and 5.5 mu g kg(-1), respectively). According to the contamination of TMR samples per region, Mato Grosso do Sul state presented the highest contaminations. Peanut meal was the most contaminated ingredient. One hundred percent of TMR in Brazilian feedlot is contaminated. Fumonisins were the mycotoxin most frequent and at highest concentrations in TMR samples. Moreover, mycotoxin concentrations have a distinct pattern among ingredients, TMR, and feedlots (local).Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)AlltechUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zootecn, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilAgencia Paulista Tecnol Agronegocios, Colina, SP, BrazilAlltech, Ctr Anim Nutrigen & Appl Anim Nutr, Nicholasville, KY USAAlltech Inc, Nicholasville, KY USAPettigrew Res Serv Inc, Champaign, IL USAAlltech Brasil, Araucaria, PR, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zootecn, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2015/21416-6FAPESP: 2017/50339-5FAPESP: 2018/20176-0Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal SciUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Agencia Paulista Tecnol AgronegociosAlltechAlltech IncPettigrew Res Serv IncAlltech BrasilCustodio, Leticia [UNESP]Prados, Laura FrancoYiannikouris, AlexandrosHolder, VaughnPettigrew, JamesKuritza, LeandroResende, Flavio Dutra de [UNESP]Siqueira, Gustavo Rezende [UNESP]2020-12-10T19:43:16Z2020-12-10T19:43:16Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article12application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820190079Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Science. Vicosa-mg: Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci, v. 48, 12 p., 2019.1806-9290http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19638910.1590/rbz4820190079S1516-35982019000100724WOS:000501509700001S1516-35982019000100724.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:44:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/196389Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:43:06.682137Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
title Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
spellingShingle Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
Custodio, Leticia [UNESP]
aflatoxin
beef cattle
feedlots
fumonisin
ingredients
Custodio, Leticia [UNESP]
aflatoxin
beef cattle
feedlots
fumonisin
ingredients
title_short Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
title_full Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
title_fullStr Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
title_full_unstemmed Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
title_sort Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot
author Custodio, Leticia [UNESP]
author_facet Custodio, Leticia [UNESP]
Custodio, Leticia [UNESP]
Prados, Laura Franco
Yiannikouris, Alexandros
Holder, Vaughn
Pettigrew, James
Kuritza, Leandro
Resende, Flavio Dutra de [UNESP]
Siqueira, Gustavo Rezende [UNESP]
Prados, Laura Franco
Yiannikouris, Alexandros
Holder, Vaughn
Pettigrew, James
Kuritza, Leandro
Resende, Flavio Dutra de [UNESP]
Siqueira, Gustavo Rezende [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Prados, Laura Franco
Yiannikouris, Alexandros
Holder, Vaughn
Pettigrew, James
Kuritza, Leandro
Resende, Flavio Dutra de [UNESP]
Siqueira, Gustavo Rezende [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Agencia Paulista Tecnol Agronegocios
Alltech
Alltech Inc
Pettigrew Res Serv Inc
Alltech Brasil
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Custodio, Leticia [UNESP]
Prados, Laura Franco
Yiannikouris, Alexandros
Holder, Vaughn
Pettigrew, James
Kuritza, Leandro
Resende, Flavio Dutra de [UNESP]
Siqueira, Gustavo Rezende [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aflatoxin
beef cattle
feedlots
fumonisin
ingredients
topic aflatoxin
beef cattle
feedlots
fumonisin
ingredients
description The objective of this survey was to identify what mycotoxins were present in ingredients used in diets offered to beef cattle in feedlots and their concentrations. The survey covered 30 Brazilian feedlots located in the five major beef-producing states. Samples of total mixed ration (TMR) and ingredients were collected and analyzed for mycotoxin using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Mycotoxin concentrations were further interpreted according to known species-specific sensitivities and normalized according to the principles of toxic equivalent factors (risk equivalent quantities - REQ) expressed in mu g kg(-1) of aflatoxin B1-equivalent. Forty percent of the visited feedlots had apparent fungi in TMR. However, only one feedlot (3%) used a mycotoxin adsorbent. On the other hand, diets with high contamination presented no apparent fungi. One hundred percent of TMR was contaminated. All samples presented at least one mycotoxin contamination, with 65.5% considered low contamination, 27.6% medium contamination, and 6.90% high contamination. The toxins identified in TMR were fumonisins (most frequently), trichothecenes A, trichothecenes B, fusaric acid, aflatoxins, and ergot (mean concentration values: 2,330, 104.3, 79.5, 105, 10.5, and 5.5 mu g kg(-1), respectively). According to the contamination of TMR samples per region, Mato Grosso do Sul state presented the highest contaminations. Peanut meal was the most contaminated ingredient. One hundred percent of TMR in Brazilian feedlot is contaminated. Fumonisins were the mycotoxin most frequent and at highest concentrations in TMR samples. Moreover, mycotoxin concentrations have a distinct pattern among ingredients, TMR, and feedlots (local).
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
2020-12-10T19:43:16Z
2020-12-10T19:43:16Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820190079
Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Science. Vicosa-mg: Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci, v. 48, 12 p., 2019.
1806-9290
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196389
10.1590/rbz4820190079
S1516-35982019000100724
WOS:000501509700001
S1516-35982019000100724.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820190079
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196389
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Science. Vicosa-mg: Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci, v. 48, 12 p., 2019.
1806-9290
10.1590/rbz4820190079
S1516-35982019000100724
WOS:000501509700001
S1516-35982019000100724.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-brazilian Journal Of Animal Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 12
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Sci
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822182242105950208
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/rbz4820190079