Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Clarens, Andres F., Middleton, Richard S., Liu, Xiaowei, Levine, Jonathan S., Carvalho, Mariana Barbosa de [UNESP], Giovanini Junior, Nelson [UNESP], Dixon, T., Herzog, H., Twinning, S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.692
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183941
Resumo: Efforts to sequester or otherwise manage carbon dioxide emissions on a large scale will require an improved understanding of the geospatial characteristics of anthropogenic CO2 sources. Recent work by the authors using newly collected data from the US Environmental Protection Agency showed that even though there are some regions of the US with access to significant supply of CO2, most regions of the country do not have sources that are concentrated enough or large enough to support large-scale carbon management activities. What's more, the life cycle carbon burdens of different CO2 sources varied considerably with some sources, e. g., extracted wells, having a much larger carbon footprint than those where CO2 is a by-product, e.g., acid gas processing facilities. Here, the effect of source switching was explored in the context of CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR). At present most CO2-EOR operations in the United States rely on CO2 that is extracted from dedicated wells generating nearly pure CO2. By-product CO2, in contrast, is produced from a number of other industries including natural gas processing plants where small mass fractions of CO2 are removed from the gas stream. The emissions implications of these two sources of CO2 are significant in the context of CO2-EOR application because in one case, CO2 emissions are being avoided but in another they are not. Yet the switch from an industrial paradigm in which extracted CO2 is used to one in which by-product CO2 may not be as straightforward as it appears. Here, the SimCCS model is applied to the oil-producing Permian basin in west Texas to understand what the effect of source switching would be on CO2 demand, infrastructure, and overall emissions. The results suggest that at present scales of deployment, the costs associated with switching to by-product CO2 are higher than extracted CO2 because of the need for new infrastructure. Nevertheless, the observed emissions reductions are large in an absolute sense and suggest that this strategy be more seriously considered. A new infrastructure would be needed to connect by-product CO2 sources with CO2-EOR sinks but the cost of this is not so great that with a modest economic incentive, source switching of CO2 could represent a near-term strategy for reducing CO2 emissions and increasing oil production. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
id UNSP_faf0352365a5d3b7ee0ab6cd6c57c290
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183941
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil RecoveryCarbon ManagementCarbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization and StorageEnhanced Oil RecoveryEfforts to sequester or otherwise manage carbon dioxide emissions on a large scale will require an improved understanding of the geospatial characteristics of anthropogenic CO2 sources. Recent work by the authors using newly collected data from the US Environmental Protection Agency showed that even though there are some regions of the US with access to significant supply of CO2, most regions of the country do not have sources that are concentrated enough or large enough to support large-scale carbon management activities. What's more, the life cycle carbon burdens of different CO2 sources varied considerably with some sources, e. g., extracted wells, having a much larger carbon footprint than those where CO2 is a by-product, e.g., acid gas processing facilities. Here, the effect of source switching was explored in the context of CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR). At present most CO2-EOR operations in the United States rely on CO2 that is extracted from dedicated wells generating nearly pure CO2. By-product CO2, in contrast, is produced from a number of other industries including natural gas processing plants where small mass fractions of CO2 are removed from the gas stream. The emissions implications of these two sources of CO2 are significant in the context of CO2-EOR application because in one case, CO2 emissions are being avoided but in another they are not. Yet the switch from an industrial paradigm in which extracted CO2 is used to one in which by-product CO2 may not be as straightforward as it appears. Here, the SimCCS model is applied to the oil-producing Permian basin in west Texas to understand what the effect of source switching would be on CO2 demand, infrastructure, and overall emissions. The results suggest that at present scales of deployment, the costs associated with switching to by-product CO2 are higher than extracted CO2 because of the need for new infrastructure. Nevertheless, the observed emissions reductions are large in an absolute sense and suggest that this strategy be more seriously considered. A new infrastructure would be needed to connect by-product CO2 sources with CO2-EOR sinks but the cost of this is not so great that with a modest economic incentive, source switching of CO2 could represent a near-term strategy for reducing CO2 emissions and increasing oil production. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USAOhio State Univ, John Glenn Sch Publ Affairs, Columbus, OH 43210 USAUniv Virginia, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USALos Alamos Natl Lab, Div Earth & Environm Sci, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USANatl Energy Technol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USAUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sao Paulo, BrazilElsevier B.V.Ohio State UnivUniv VirginiaLos Alamos Natl LabNatl Energy Technol LabUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Bielicki, Jeffrey M.Clarens, Andres F.Middleton, Richard S.Liu, XiaoweiLevine, Jonathan S.Carvalho, Mariana Barbosa de [UNESP]Giovanini Junior, Nelson [UNESP]Dixon, T.Herzog, H.Twinning, S.2019-10-03T18:18:26Z2019-10-03T18:18:26Z2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject6557-6564http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.69212th International Conference On Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Ghgt-12. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 63, p. 6557-6564, 2014.1876-6102http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18394110.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.692WOS:000361211506074Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPeng12th International Conference On Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Ghgt-12info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T15:55:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183941Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:14:53.875527Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery
title Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery
spellingShingle Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery
Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
Carbon Management
Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization and Storage
Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_short Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_full Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_fullStr Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_full_unstemmed Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_sort Shifting Sands in a CO2 Desert: Replacing Extracted CO2 with By-product CO2 for Use in Enhanced Oil Recovery
author Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
author_facet Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
Clarens, Andres F.
Middleton, Richard S.
Liu, Xiaowei
Levine, Jonathan S.
Carvalho, Mariana Barbosa de [UNESP]
Giovanini Junior, Nelson [UNESP]
Dixon, T.
Herzog, H.
Twinning, S.
author_role author
author2 Clarens, Andres F.
Middleton, Richard S.
Liu, Xiaowei
Levine, Jonathan S.
Carvalho, Mariana Barbosa de [UNESP]
Giovanini Junior, Nelson [UNESP]
Dixon, T.
Herzog, H.
Twinning, S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ohio State Univ
Univ Virginia
Los Alamos Natl Lab
Natl Energy Technol Lab
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
Clarens, Andres F.
Middleton, Richard S.
Liu, Xiaowei
Levine, Jonathan S.
Carvalho, Mariana Barbosa de [UNESP]
Giovanini Junior, Nelson [UNESP]
Dixon, T.
Herzog, H.
Twinning, S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carbon Management
Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization and Storage
Enhanced Oil Recovery
topic Carbon Management
Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization and Storage
Enhanced Oil Recovery
description Efforts to sequester or otherwise manage carbon dioxide emissions on a large scale will require an improved understanding of the geospatial characteristics of anthropogenic CO2 sources. Recent work by the authors using newly collected data from the US Environmental Protection Agency showed that even though there are some regions of the US with access to significant supply of CO2, most regions of the country do not have sources that are concentrated enough or large enough to support large-scale carbon management activities. What's more, the life cycle carbon burdens of different CO2 sources varied considerably with some sources, e. g., extracted wells, having a much larger carbon footprint than those where CO2 is a by-product, e.g., acid gas processing facilities. Here, the effect of source switching was explored in the context of CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR). At present most CO2-EOR operations in the United States rely on CO2 that is extracted from dedicated wells generating nearly pure CO2. By-product CO2, in contrast, is produced from a number of other industries including natural gas processing plants where small mass fractions of CO2 are removed from the gas stream. The emissions implications of these two sources of CO2 are significant in the context of CO2-EOR application because in one case, CO2 emissions are being avoided but in another they are not. Yet the switch from an industrial paradigm in which extracted CO2 is used to one in which by-product CO2 may not be as straightforward as it appears. Here, the SimCCS model is applied to the oil-producing Permian basin in west Texas to understand what the effect of source switching would be on CO2 demand, infrastructure, and overall emissions. The results suggest that at present scales of deployment, the costs associated with switching to by-product CO2 are higher than extracted CO2 because of the need for new infrastructure. Nevertheless, the observed emissions reductions are large in an absolute sense and suggest that this strategy be more seriously considered. A new infrastructure would be needed to connect by-product CO2 sources with CO2-EOR sinks but the cost of this is not so great that with a modest economic incentive, source switching of CO2 could represent a near-term strategy for reducing CO2 emissions and increasing oil production. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
2019-10-03T18:18:26Z
2019-10-03T18:18:26Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.692
12th International Conference On Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Ghgt-12. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 63, p. 6557-6564, 2014.
1876-6102
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183941
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.692
WOS:000361211506074
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.692
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183941
identifier_str_mv 12th International Conference On Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Ghgt-12. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 63, p. 6557-6564, 2014.
1876-6102
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.692
WOS:000361211506074
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 12th International Conference On Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Ghgt-12
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 6557-6564
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129041338728448