Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200616 |
Resumo: | Difficulty in controlling weeds has hindered the success of vegetation recovery projects using white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) seedlings in degraded areas. The use of herbicides is indispensable to mitigate damage and make these areas viable. Therefore, this study evaluated the selectivity of pre- and postemergence herbicides on white leadtree seedlings. Two experiments were carried out in a greenhouse in a randomized block design with four replications. Pre-emergence treatments (g ha-1) were: atrazine (3,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (20.00), clomazone (900.00), flumioxazin (125.00), indaziflam (100.00), isoxaflutole (262.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), sulfentrazone (500), and S-metolachlor (1,920.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). The second experiment consisted of the following postemergence treatments (g ha-1): atrazine (2,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (15.00), clomazone (54.00), flumioxazin (20.00), glyphosate (396.25), haloxyfop-methyl (49.88), indaziflam (75.00), isoxaflutole (187.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), and S-metolachlor (1,440.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). Phytotoxicity, plant height, and root collar diameter were assessed at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after application (DAA). Shoot dry matter was assessed at 60 DAA. Herbicides atrazine, indaziflam, and isoxaflutole, applied in pre- and postemergence, in addition to glyphosate, negatively influenced all evaluations, being considered nonselective for white leadtree plants. Herbicides with selectivity, regardless of the application method, were chlorimuron-ethyl, clomazone, flumioxazin, haloxyfop-methyl, pendimethalin, sulfentrazone, and S-metolachlor. |
id |
UNSP_fb2308a1180bc24e4ea34e27bc7fc5b5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200616 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)Seletividade de herbicidas em mudas de Leucena (Leucaena leucocephala)Forest restorationPhytotoxicityRecovery of degraded areasReforestationSelective herbicidesDifficulty in controlling weeds has hindered the success of vegetation recovery projects using white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) seedlings in degraded areas. The use of herbicides is indispensable to mitigate damage and make these areas viable. Therefore, this study evaluated the selectivity of pre- and postemergence herbicides on white leadtree seedlings. Two experiments were carried out in a greenhouse in a randomized block design with four replications. Pre-emergence treatments (g ha-1) were: atrazine (3,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (20.00), clomazone (900.00), flumioxazin (125.00), indaziflam (100.00), isoxaflutole (262.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), sulfentrazone (500), and S-metolachlor (1,920.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). The second experiment consisted of the following postemergence treatments (g ha-1): atrazine (2,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (15.00), clomazone (54.00), flumioxazin (20.00), glyphosate (396.25), haloxyfop-methyl (49.88), indaziflam (75.00), isoxaflutole (187.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), and S-metolachlor (1,440.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). Phytotoxicity, plant height, and root collar diameter were assessed at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after application (DAA). Shoot dry matter was assessed at 60 DAA. Herbicides atrazine, indaziflam, and isoxaflutole, applied in pre- and postemergence, in addition to glyphosate, negatively influenced all evaluations, being considered nonselective for white leadtree plants. Herbicides with selectivity, regardless of the application method, were chlorimuron-ethyl, clomazone, flumioxazin, haloxyfop-methyl, pendimethalin, sulfentrazone, and S-metolachlor.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Doutorando em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Departamento de Proteção de Plantas, Av. Universitária, nº3780 - Altos do ParaísoGraduando em Engenharia Florestal Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDoutorando em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDepartamento de Produção e Melhoramento Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDoutorando em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Departamento de Proteção de Plantas, Av. Universitária, nº3780 - Altos do ParaísoGraduando em Engenharia Florestal Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDoutorando em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDepartamento de Produção e Melhoramento Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP]Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP]Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP]Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP]Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:11:22Z2020-12-12T02:11:22Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article56-66http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66Cientifica, v. 48, n. 1, p. 56-66, 2020.1984-5529http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20061610.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-662-s2.0-85086649916Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCientificainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:54:20Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200616Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:24:23.331974Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) Seletividade de herbicidas em mudas de Leucena (Leucaena leucocephala) |
title |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) |
spellingShingle |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP] Forest restoration Phytotoxicity Recovery of degraded areas Reforestation Selective herbicides |
title_short |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) |
title_full |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) |
title_fullStr |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) |
title_sort |
Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) |
author |
Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP] Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP] Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP] Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP] Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP] Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP] Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP] Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP] Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP] Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP] Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP] Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP] Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP] Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP] Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Forest restoration Phytotoxicity Recovery of degraded areas Reforestation Selective herbicides |
topic |
Forest restoration Phytotoxicity Recovery of degraded areas Reforestation Selective herbicides |
description |
Difficulty in controlling weeds has hindered the success of vegetation recovery projects using white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) seedlings in degraded areas. The use of herbicides is indispensable to mitigate damage and make these areas viable. Therefore, this study evaluated the selectivity of pre- and postemergence herbicides on white leadtree seedlings. Two experiments were carried out in a greenhouse in a randomized block design with four replications. Pre-emergence treatments (g ha-1) were: atrazine (3,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (20.00), clomazone (900.00), flumioxazin (125.00), indaziflam (100.00), isoxaflutole (262.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), sulfentrazone (500), and S-metolachlor (1,920.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). The second experiment consisted of the following postemergence treatments (g ha-1): atrazine (2,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (15.00), clomazone (54.00), flumioxazin (20.00), glyphosate (396.25), haloxyfop-methyl (49.88), indaziflam (75.00), isoxaflutole (187.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), and S-metolachlor (1,440.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). Phytotoxicity, plant height, and root collar diameter were assessed at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after application (DAA). Shoot dry matter was assessed at 60 DAA. Herbicides atrazine, indaziflam, and isoxaflutole, applied in pre- and postemergence, in addition to glyphosate, negatively influenced all evaluations, being considered nonselective for white leadtree plants. Herbicides with selectivity, regardless of the application method, were chlorimuron-ethyl, clomazone, flumioxazin, haloxyfop-methyl, pendimethalin, sulfentrazone, and S-metolachlor. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T02:11:22Z 2020-12-12T02:11:22Z 2020-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66 Cientifica, v. 48, n. 1, p. 56-66, 2020. 1984-5529 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200616 10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66 2-s2.0-85086649916 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200616 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cientifica, v. 48, n. 1, p. 56-66, 2020. 1984-5529 10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66 2-s2.0-85086649916 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Cientifica |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
56-66 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128356266278912 |