Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP], Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP], Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP], Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP], Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200616
Resumo: Difficulty in controlling weeds has hindered the success of vegetation recovery projects using white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) seedlings in degraded areas. The use of herbicides is indispensable to mitigate damage and make these areas viable. Therefore, this study evaluated the selectivity of pre- and postemergence herbicides on white leadtree seedlings. Two experiments were carried out in a greenhouse in a randomized block design with four replications. Pre-emergence treatments (g ha-1) were: atrazine (3,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (20.00), clomazone (900.00), flumioxazin (125.00), indaziflam (100.00), isoxaflutole (262.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), sulfentrazone (500), and S-metolachlor (1,920.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). The second experiment consisted of the following postemergence treatments (g ha-1): atrazine (2,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (15.00), clomazone (54.00), flumioxazin (20.00), glyphosate (396.25), haloxyfop-methyl (49.88), indaziflam (75.00), isoxaflutole (187.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), and S-metolachlor (1,440.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). Phytotoxicity, plant height, and root collar diameter were assessed at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after application (DAA). Shoot dry matter was assessed at 60 DAA. Herbicides atrazine, indaziflam, and isoxaflutole, applied in pre- and postemergence, in addition to glyphosate, negatively influenced all evaluations, being considered nonselective for white leadtree plants. Herbicides with selectivity, regardless of the application method, were chlorimuron-ethyl, clomazone, flumioxazin, haloxyfop-methyl, pendimethalin, sulfentrazone, and S-metolachlor.
id UNSP_fb2308a1180bc24e4ea34e27bc7fc5b5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200616
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)Seletividade de herbicidas em mudas de Leucena (Leucaena leucocephala)Forest restorationPhytotoxicityRecovery of degraded areasReforestationSelective herbicidesDifficulty in controlling weeds has hindered the success of vegetation recovery projects using white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) seedlings in degraded areas. The use of herbicides is indispensable to mitigate damage and make these areas viable. Therefore, this study evaluated the selectivity of pre- and postemergence herbicides on white leadtree seedlings. Two experiments were carried out in a greenhouse in a randomized block design with four replications. Pre-emergence treatments (g ha-1) were: atrazine (3,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (20.00), clomazone (900.00), flumioxazin (125.00), indaziflam (100.00), isoxaflutole (262.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), sulfentrazone (500), and S-metolachlor (1,920.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). The second experiment consisted of the following postemergence treatments (g ha-1): atrazine (2,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (15.00), clomazone (54.00), flumioxazin (20.00), glyphosate (396.25), haloxyfop-methyl (49.88), indaziflam (75.00), isoxaflutole (187.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), and S-metolachlor (1,440.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). Phytotoxicity, plant height, and root collar diameter were assessed at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after application (DAA). Shoot dry matter was assessed at 60 DAA. Herbicides atrazine, indaziflam, and isoxaflutole, applied in pre- and postemergence, in addition to glyphosate, negatively influenced all evaluations, being considered nonselective for white leadtree plants. Herbicides with selectivity, regardless of the application method, were chlorimuron-ethyl, clomazone, flumioxazin, haloxyfop-methyl, pendimethalin, sulfentrazone, and S-metolachlor.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Doutorando em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Departamento de Proteção de Plantas, Av. Universitária, nº3780 - Altos do ParaísoGraduando em Engenharia Florestal Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDoutorando em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDepartamento de Produção e Melhoramento Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDoutorando em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Departamento de Proteção de Plantas, Av. Universitária, nº3780 - Altos do ParaísoGraduando em Engenharia Florestal Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDoutorando em Agronomia (Proteção de Plantas) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasDepartamento de Produção e Melhoramento Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP]Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP]Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP]Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP]Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:11:22Z2020-12-12T02:11:22Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article56-66http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66Cientifica, v. 48, n. 1, p. 56-66, 2020.1984-5529http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20061610.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-662-s2.0-85086649916Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCientificainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:54:20Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200616Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:24:23.331974Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
Seletividade de herbicidas em mudas de Leucena (Leucaena leucocephala)
title Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
spellingShingle Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP]
Forest restoration
Phytotoxicity
Recovery of degraded areas
Reforestation
Selective herbicides
title_short Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
title_full Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
title_fullStr Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
title_full_unstemmed Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
title_sort Herbicides selectivity on seedlings of White Leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala)
author Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP]
author_facet Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP]
Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP]
Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP]
Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP]
Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP]
Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP]
Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP]
Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Roque Carvalho [UNESP]
Gomes, Diego Munhoz [UNESP]
Anunciato, Vitor Muller [UNESP]
Bianchi, Leandro [UNESP]
Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
Velini, Edivaldo Domingues [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Forest restoration
Phytotoxicity
Recovery of degraded areas
Reforestation
Selective herbicides
topic Forest restoration
Phytotoxicity
Recovery of degraded areas
Reforestation
Selective herbicides
description Difficulty in controlling weeds has hindered the success of vegetation recovery projects using white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) seedlings in degraded areas. The use of herbicides is indispensable to mitigate damage and make these areas viable. Therefore, this study evaluated the selectivity of pre- and postemergence herbicides on white leadtree seedlings. Two experiments were carried out in a greenhouse in a randomized block design with four replications. Pre-emergence treatments (g ha-1) were: atrazine (3,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (20.00), clomazone (900.00), flumioxazin (125.00), indaziflam (100.00), isoxaflutole (262.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), sulfentrazone (500), and S-metolachlor (1,920.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). The second experiment consisted of the following postemergence treatments (g ha-1): atrazine (2,500.00), chlorimuron-ethyl (15.00), clomazone (54.00), flumioxazin (20.00), glyphosate (396.25), haloxyfop-methyl (49.88), indaziflam (75.00), isoxaflutole (187.50), pendimethalin (1,150.00), and S-metolachlor (1,440.00), in addition to a control (without herbicide). Phytotoxicity, plant height, and root collar diameter were assessed at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after application (DAA). Shoot dry matter was assessed at 60 DAA. Herbicides atrazine, indaziflam, and isoxaflutole, applied in pre- and postemergence, in addition to glyphosate, negatively influenced all evaluations, being considered nonselective for white leadtree plants. Herbicides with selectivity, regardless of the application method, were chlorimuron-ethyl, clomazone, flumioxazin, haloxyfop-methyl, pendimethalin, sulfentrazone, and S-metolachlor.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:11:22Z
2020-12-12T02:11:22Z
2020-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66
Cientifica, v. 48, n. 1, p. 56-66, 2020.
1984-5529
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200616
10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66
2-s2.0-85086649916
url http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200616
identifier_str_mv Cientifica, v. 48, n. 1, p. 56-66, 2020.
1984-5529
10.15361/1984-5529.2020V48N1P56-66
2-s2.0-85086649916
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Cientifica
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 56-66
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128356266278912