Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meneguin, Silmara [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Mourão, Ioana Bitencourt [UNESP], Pollo, Camila Fernandes [UNESP], Miot, Helio Amante [UNESP], Garuzi, Miriane [UNESP], Oliveira, Cesar de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01599-5
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240856
Resumo: Objective: To compare the psychometric performance of a generic and specific instruments in assessing melasma-related quality of life. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 150 patients with melasma attending an outpatient dermatology clinic of a public hospital in São Paulo state, Brazil. Data were collected using a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical data as well as the generic WHOQOL-BREF, and the dermatological-specific Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma. Results: The overall internal consistency of the domains of the three instruments was ≥ 0.7. A strong positive correlation was identified between the Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma domains (0.68-0.78). Item-response theory showed that most Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma domains were more informative than WHOQOL-BREF. Conclusion: The three instruments for assessing QOL tested presented good psychometric performance, with satisfactory internal consistency values. Only the two dermatological instruments, however, demonstrated a strong correlation between the domains that assess social, emotional, and functional aspects of QOL, indicating that both were able to identify impairments in other QOL dimensions in addition to the physical domain.
id UNSP_fd37624c354ccb1816359235e4d1e2dc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240856
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasmaMelasmaPsychometryQuality of lifeQuestionnaireObjective: To compare the psychometric performance of a generic and specific instruments in assessing melasma-related quality of life. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 150 patients with melasma attending an outpatient dermatology clinic of a public hospital in São Paulo state, Brazil. Data were collected using a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical data as well as the generic WHOQOL-BREF, and the dermatological-specific Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma. Results: The overall internal consistency of the domains of the three instruments was ≥ 0.7. A strong positive correlation was identified between the Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma domains (0.68-0.78). Item-response theory showed that most Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma domains were more informative than WHOQOL-BREF. Conclusion: The three instruments for assessing QOL tested presented good psychometric performance, with satisfactory internal consistency values. Only the two dermatological instruments, however, demonstrated a strong correlation between the domains that assess social, emotional, and functional aspects of QOL, indicating that both were able to identify impairments in other QOL dimensions in addition to the physical domain.Nursing Department Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)Department of Dermatology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)Department of Epidemiology & Public Health University College LondonNursing Department Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)Department of Dermatology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University College LondonMeneguin, Silmara [UNESP]Mourão, Ioana Bitencourt [UNESP]Pollo, Camila Fernandes [UNESP]Miot, Helio Amante [UNESP]Garuzi, Miriane [UNESP]Oliveira, Cesar de2023-03-01T20:35:51Z2023-03-01T20:35:51Z2022-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01599-5BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 22, n. 1, 2022.1471-2288http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24085610.1186/s12874-022-01599-52-s2.0-85128446610Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBMC Medical Research Methodologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:35:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240856Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-03-01T20:35:51Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma
title Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma
spellingShingle Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma
Meneguin, Silmara [UNESP]
Melasma
Psychometry
Quality of life
Questionnaire
title_short Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma
title_full Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma
title_fullStr Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma
title_sort Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma
author Meneguin, Silmara [UNESP]
author_facet Meneguin, Silmara [UNESP]
Mourão, Ioana Bitencourt [UNESP]
Pollo, Camila Fernandes [UNESP]
Miot, Helio Amante [UNESP]
Garuzi, Miriane [UNESP]
Oliveira, Cesar de
author_role author
author2 Mourão, Ioana Bitencourt [UNESP]
Pollo, Camila Fernandes [UNESP]
Miot, Helio Amante [UNESP]
Garuzi, Miriane [UNESP]
Oliveira, Cesar de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University College London
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meneguin, Silmara [UNESP]
Mourão, Ioana Bitencourt [UNESP]
Pollo, Camila Fernandes [UNESP]
Miot, Helio Amante [UNESP]
Garuzi, Miriane [UNESP]
Oliveira, Cesar de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Melasma
Psychometry
Quality of life
Questionnaire
topic Melasma
Psychometry
Quality of life
Questionnaire
description Objective: To compare the psychometric performance of a generic and specific instruments in assessing melasma-related quality of life. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 150 patients with melasma attending an outpatient dermatology clinic of a public hospital in São Paulo state, Brazil. Data were collected using a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical data as well as the generic WHOQOL-BREF, and the dermatological-specific Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma. Results: The overall internal consistency of the domains of the three instruments was ≥ 0.7. A strong positive correlation was identified between the Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma domains (0.68-0.78). Item-response theory showed that most Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma domains were more informative than WHOQOL-BREF. Conclusion: The three instruments for assessing QOL tested presented good psychometric performance, with satisfactory internal consistency values. Only the two dermatological instruments, however, demonstrated a strong correlation between the domains that assess social, emotional, and functional aspects of QOL, indicating that both were able to identify impairments in other QOL dimensions in addition to the physical domain.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-01
2023-03-01T20:35:51Z
2023-03-01T20:35:51Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01599-5
BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 22, n. 1, 2022.
1471-2288
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240856
10.1186/s12874-022-01599-5
2-s2.0-85128446610
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01599-5
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240856
identifier_str_mv BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 22, n. 1, 2022.
1471-2288
10.1186/s12874-022-01599-5
2-s2.0-85128446610
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv BMC Medical Research Methodology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046618927202304