Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.005 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/187183 |
Resumo: | Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes have increasingly expanded to consider ecosystem services (ESS). In Brazil, the Forest Code permits PES but does not specify the scheme operationalization. The way ESS should be quantified and valued has not yet been implemented country-wide, nor has the funding source for PES. Through interviews with farmers in Rio Claro-SP, Brazil, and in Cairngorms National Park in the highlands and lowlands of Scotland, UK, we compared farmers’ perspectives concerning ESS and PES, focusing on the PES implementation in sugarcane landscape in São Paulo state. While Scottish farmers perceived more cultural services, Brazilian farmers focused on regulating services, which we attribute to socio-political and landscape differences. Despite these differences, farmers in both areas preferred opportunity cost approach for ESS valuation because this method captures efforts to maintain ESS. Thereby, the opportunity cost should be considered for valuation in PES schemes, but conversely, budgetary constraints make it impossible to satisfy farmers with PES in regions of high productivity in the southeast of Brazil. Lessons learned concerning the PES subsidies in Scotland indicates the importance of co-designing schemes with stakeholders, minimizing trade-offs between the environment. Therefore, the participants as ESS providers, beneficiaries and intermediaries in the public policies arena was recognized for co-optimize the trade-offs between costs and effectiveness in PES. |
id |
UNSP_fe04eb0c434a36f9b8603e86e2ab5a4a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/187183 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and BrazilCairngorms National ParkParticipatory methodsPayment for ecosystem servicesPublic policiesSugarcane productionPayments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes have increasingly expanded to consider ecosystem services (ESS). In Brazil, the Forest Code permits PES but does not specify the scheme operationalization. The way ESS should be quantified and valued has not yet been implemented country-wide, nor has the funding source for PES. Through interviews with farmers in Rio Claro-SP, Brazil, and in Cairngorms National Park in the highlands and lowlands of Scotland, UK, we compared farmers’ perspectives concerning ESS and PES, focusing on the PES implementation in sugarcane landscape in São Paulo state. While Scottish farmers perceived more cultural services, Brazilian farmers focused on regulating services, which we attribute to socio-political and landscape differences. Despite these differences, farmers in both areas preferred opportunity cost approach for ESS valuation because this method captures efforts to maintain ESS. Thereby, the opportunity cost should be considered for valuation in PES schemes, but conversely, budgetary constraints make it impossible to satisfy farmers with PES in regions of high productivity in the southeast of Brazil. Lessons learned concerning the PES subsidies in Scotland indicates the importance of co-designing schemes with stakeholders, minimizing trade-offs between the environment. Therefore, the participants as ESS providers, beneficiaries and intermediaries in the public policies arena was recognized for co-optimize the trade-offs between costs and effectiveness in PES.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Center for Meteorological and Climatic Research Applied to Agriculture – CEPAGRI Universidade de CampinasStockholm Resilience Center – Researcher Graid Project Stockholm UniversityCenter for Ecology and Hydrology Natural Environment Research Council–NERC, Bush Estate, PenicuikHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZDepartamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista – UnespDepartamento de Ecologia Universidade Estadual Paulista – UnespCAPES: 88881.030372/2013-01Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Stockholm UniversityNatural Environment Research Council–NERCHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Canova, Moara AlmeidaLapola, David M.Pinho, PatríciaDick, JanPatricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP]Priess, Joerg A.2019-10-06T15:28:02Z2019-10-06T15:28:02Z2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article164-172http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.005Ecosystem Services, v. 35, p. 164-172.2212-0416http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18718310.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.0052-s2.0-85058626699Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcosystem Servicesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:54:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/187183Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:58:46.161344Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil |
title |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil Canova, Moara Almeida Cairngorms National Park Participatory methods Payment for ecosystem services Public policies Sugarcane production |
title_short |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil |
title_full |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil |
title_sort |
Different ecosystem services, same (dis)satisfaction with compensation: A critical comparison between farmers’ perception in Scotland and Brazil |
author |
Canova, Moara Almeida |
author_facet |
Canova, Moara Almeida Lapola, David M. Pinho, Patrícia Dick, Jan Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP] Priess, Joerg A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lapola, David M. Pinho, Patrícia Dick, Jan Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP] Priess, Joerg A. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Stockholm University Natural Environment Research Council–NERC Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Canova, Moara Almeida Lapola, David M. Pinho, Patrícia Dick, Jan Patricio, Gleiciani B. [UNESP] Priess, Joerg A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cairngorms National Park Participatory methods Payment for ecosystem services Public policies Sugarcane production |
topic |
Cairngorms National Park Participatory methods Payment for ecosystem services Public policies Sugarcane production |
description |
Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes have increasingly expanded to consider ecosystem services (ESS). In Brazil, the Forest Code permits PES but does not specify the scheme operationalization. The way ESS should be quantified and valued has not yet been implemented country-wide, nor has the funding source for PES. Through interviews with farmers in Rio Claro-SP, Brazil, and in Cairngorms National Park in the highlands and lowlands of Scotland, UK, we compared farmers’ perspectives concerning ESS and PES, focusing on the PES implementation in sugarcane landscape in São Paulo state. While Scottish farmers perceived more cultural services, Brazilian farmers focused on regulating services, which we attribute to socio-political and landscape differences. Despite these differences, farmers in both areas preferred opportunity cost approach for ESS valuation because this method captures efforts to maintain ESS. Thereby, the opportunity cost should be considered for valuation in PES schemes, but conversely, budgetary constraints make it impossible to satisfy farmers with PES in regions of high productivity in the southeast of Brazil. Lessons learned concerning the PES subsidies in Scotland indicates the importance of co-designing schemes with stakeholders, minimizing trade-offs between the environment. Therefore, the participants as ESS providers, beneficiaries and intermediaries in the public policies arena was recognized for co-optimize the trade-offs between costs and effectiveness in PES. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T15:28:02Z 2019-10-06T15:28:02Z 2019-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.005 Ecosystem Services, v. 35, p. 164-172. 2212-0416 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/187183 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.005 2-s2.0-85058626699 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.005 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/187183 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ecosystem Services, v. 35, p. 164-172. 2212-0416 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.005 2-s2.0-85058626699 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecosystem Services |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
164-172 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128727781998592 |