Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188426 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this study was investigate the influence of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of two different type of artificial resin teeth repaired with composite resin. Fifteen (15) artificial teeth of each material (CR-composite resin and AR-acrylic resin) were divided into four parts and then embedded in acrylic resin. After, the teeth were separated into eight groups according to the surface treatments prior to the repair: control group (c), adhesive application (a), sandblasting (S) and sandblasting followed by adhesive application (Sa). Next, a composite resin cylinder (Ø = 0.95 mm e h = 2 mm) simulating a repair was built onto each surface. The specimens were submitted to a microshear bond test after 24 h, using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min, 50 kgf) until fracture. The data was subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test, with a significance level of 5%. ANOVA showed statistical difference for the interaction artificial teeth material* surface treatment (p = 0.001). CR teeth (29.79 ± 11.54 MPa) showed higher bond strength mean values than AR (18.48 ± 9.73 MPa). Regardless the artificial teeth material, Sa (36.92 ± 6.16 MPa) treatment showed the higher bond strength values. The highest bond strength value was found in CRSa (45.93 ± 7.13 MPa) and the lowest was found in ARc (5.38 ± 0.90 MPa). Based on the results, tooth material should be taken in account in order to choose the best surface treatment and achieve suitable bond strength values when a repair is necessary. For artificial teeth in acrylic resin, applying an adhesive system is the best procedure, with or without sandblasting the alumina particles. However, for artificial teeth in composite resin, an association of sandblasting followed by applying an adhesive system showed more promising bond strength values. |
id |
UNSP_fecf5c4e6e20d458f659583d8a7fae2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188426 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teethAcrylic resinArtificial teethComposite resinShear bond strengthSurface treatmentThe purpose of this study was investigate the influence of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of two different type of artificial resin teeth repaired with composite resin. Fifteen (15) artificial teeth of each material (CR-composite resin and AR-acrylic resin) were divided into four parts and then embedded in acrylic resin. After, the teeth were separated into eight groups according to the surface treatments prior to the repair: control group (c), adhesive application (a), sandblasting (S) and sandblasting followed by adhesive application (Sa). Next, a composite resin cylinder (Ø = 0.95 mm e h = 2 mm) simulating a repair was built onto each surface. The specimens were submitted to a microshear bond test after 24 h, using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min, 50 kgf) until fracture. The data was subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test, with a significance level of 5%. ANOVA showed statistical difference for the interaction artificial teeth material* surface treatment (p = 0.001). CR teeth (29.79 ± 11.54 MPa) showed higher bond strength mean values than AR (18.48 ± 9.73 MPa). Regardless the artificial teeth material, Sa (36.92 ± 6.16 MPa) treatment showed the higher bond strength values. The highest bond strength value was found in CRSa (45.93 ± 7.13 MPa) and the lowest was found in ARc (5.38 ± 0.90 MPa). Based on the results, tooth material should be taken in account in order to choose the best surface treatment and achieve suitable bond strength values when a repair is necessary. For artificial teeth in acrylic resin, applying an adhesive system is the best procedure, with or without sandblasting the alumina particles. However, for artificial teeth in composite resin, an association of sandblasting followed by applying an adhesive system showed more promising bond strength values.Post-Graduate Program in Restorative Dentistry (Prosthodontic) Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp/SJC), Engenheiro Francisco José Longo Avenue, 777Post-Graduate Program in Restorative Dentistry (Prosthodontic) Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp/SJC), Engenheiro Francisco José Longo Avenue, 777Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP]Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP]Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP]Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP]Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]2019-10-06T16:07:43Z2019-10-06T16:07:43Z2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1Applied Adhesion Science, v. 6, n. 1, 2018.2196-4351http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18842610.1186/s40563-018-0108-12-s2.0-85057480933Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengApplied Adhesion Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:10:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188426Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:40:18.067436Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth |
title |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth |
spellingShingle |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP] Acrylic resin Artificial teeth Composite resin Shear bond strength Surface treatment |
title_short |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth |
title_full |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth |
title_fullStr |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth |
title_sort |
Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth |
author |
Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP] Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP] de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP] Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP] Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP] Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP] de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP] Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP] Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP] Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP] Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP] de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP] Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP] Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP] Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acrylic resin Artificial teeth Composite resin Shear bond strength Surface treatment |
topic |
Acrylic resin Artificial teeth Composite resin Shear bond strength Surface treatment |
description |
The purpose of this study was investigate the influence of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of two different type of artificial resin teeth repaired with composite resin. Fifteen (15) artificial teeth of each material (CR-composite resin and AR-acrylic resin) were divided into four parts and then embedded in acrylic resin. After, the teeth were separated into eight groups according to the surface treatments prior to the repair: control group (c), adhesive application (a), sandblasting (S) and sandblasting followed by adhesive application (Sa). Next, a composite resin cylinder (Ø = 0.95 mm e h = 2 mm) simulating a repair was built onto each surface. The specimens were submitted to a microshear bond test after 24 h, using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min, 50 kgf) until fracture. The data was subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test, with a significance level of 5%. ANOVA showed statistical difference for the interaction artificial teeth material* surface treatment (p = 0.001). CR teeth (29.79 ± 11.54 MPa) showed higher bond strength mean values than AR (18.48 ± 9.73 MPa). Regardless the artificial teeth material, Sa (36.92 ± 6.16 MPa) treatment showed the higher bond strength values. The highest bond strength value was found in CRSa (45.93 ± 7.13 MPa) and the lowest was found in ARc (5.38 ± 0.90 MPa). Based on the results, tooth material should be taken in account in order to choose the best surface treatment and achieve suitable bond strength values when a repair is necessary. For artificial teeth in acrylic resin, applying an adhesive system is the best procedure, with or without sandblasting the alumina particles. However, for artificial teeth in composite resin, an association of sandblasting followed by applying an adhesive system showed more promising bond strength values. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 2019-10-06T16:07:43Z 2019-10-06T16:07:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1 Applied Adhesion Science, v. 6, n. 1, 2018. 2196-4351 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188426 10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1 2-s2.0-85057480933 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188426 |
identifier_str_mv |
Applied Adhesion Science, v. 6, n. 1, 2018. 2196-4351 10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1 2-s2.0-85057480933 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Applied Adhesion Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129449352232960 |