Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP], de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP], Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP], Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP], Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188426
Resumo: The purpose of this study was investigate the influence of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of two different type of artificial resin teeth repaired with composite resin. Fifteen (15) artificial teeth of each material (CR-composite resin and AR-acrylic resin) were divided into four parts and then embedded in acrylic resin. After, the teeth were separated into eight groups according to the surface treatments prior to the repair: control group (c), adhesive application (a), sandblasting (S) and sandblasting followed by adhesive application (Sa). Next, a composite resin cylinder (Ø = 0.95 mm e h = 2 mm) simulating a repair was built onto each surface. The specimens were submitted to a microshear bond test after 24 h, using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min, 50 kgf) until fracture. The data was subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test, with a significance level of 5%. ANOVA showed statistical difference for the interaction artificial teeth material* surface treatment (p = 0.001). CR teeth (29.79 ± 11.54 MPa) showed higher bond strength mean values than AR (18.48 ± 9.73 MPa). Regardless the artificial teeth material, Sa (36.92 ± 6.16 MPa) treatment showed the higher bond strength values. The highest bond strength value was found in CRSa (45.93 ± 7.13 MPa) and the lowest was found in ARc (5.38 ± 0.90 MPa). Based on the results, tooth material should be taken in account in order to choose the best surface treatment and achieve suitable bond strength values when a repair is necessary. For artificial teeth in acrylic resin, applying an adhesive system is the best procedure, with or without sandblasting the alumina particles. However, for artificial teeth in composite resin, an association of sandblasting followed by applying an adhesive system showed more promising bond strength values.
id UNSP_fecf5c4e6e20d458f659583d8a7fae2e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188426
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teethAcrylic resinArtificial teethComposite resinShear bond strengthSurface treatmentThe purpose of this study was investigate the influence of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of two different type of artificial resin teeth repaired with composite resin. Fifteen (15) artificial teeth of each material (CR-composite resin and AR-acrylic resin) were divided into four parts and then embedded in acrylic resin. After, the teeth were separated into eight groups according to the surface treatments prior to the repair: control group (c), adhesive application (a), sandblasting (S) and sandblasting followed by adhesive application (Sa). Next, a composite resin cylinder (Ø = 0.95 mm e h = 2 mm) simulating a repair was built onto each surface. The specimens were submitted to a microshear bond test after 24 h, using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min, 50 kgf) until fracture. The data was subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test, with a significance level of 5%. ANOVA showed statistical difference for the interaction artificial teeth material* surface treatment (p = 0.001). CR teeth (29.79 ± 11.54 MPa) showed higher bond strength mean values than AR (18.48 ± 9.73 MPa). Regardless the artificial teeth material, Sa (36.92 ± 6.16 MPa) treatment showed the higher bond strength values. The highest bond strength value was found in CRSa (45.93 ± 7.13 MPa) and the lowest was found in ARc (5.38 ± 0.90 MPa). Based on the results, tooth material should be taken in account in order to choose the best surface treatment and achieve suitable bond strength values when a repair is necessary. For artificial teeth in acrylic resin, applying an adhesive system is the best procedure, with or without sandblasting the alumina particles. However, for artificial teeth in composite resin, an association of sandblasting followed by applying an adhesive system showed more promising bond strength values.Post-Graduate Program in Restorative Dentistry (Prosthodontic) Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp/SJC), Engenheiro Francisco José Longo Avenue, 777Post-Graduate Program in Restorative Dentistry (Prosthodontic) Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp/SJC), Engenheiro Francisco José Longo Avenue, 777Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP]Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP]Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP]Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP]Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]2019-10-06T16:07:43Z2019-10-06T16:07:43Z2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1Applied Adhesion Science, v. 6, n. 1, 2018.2196-4351http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18842610.1186/s40563-018-0108-12-s2.0-85057480933Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengApplied Adhesion Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:10:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188426Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:40:18.067436Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
title Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
spellingShingle Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP]
Acrylic resin
Artificial teeth
Composite resin
Shear bond strength
Surface treatment
title_short Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
title_full Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
title_fullStr Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
title_full_unstemmed Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
title_sort Effect of surface treatments on the bond repair strength of resin composite to different artificial teeth
author Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP]
author_facet Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP]
Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP]
Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP]
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP]
Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP]
Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP]
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
de Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori [UNESP]
Uemura, Eduardo Shigueyuki [UNESP]
Paes Junior, Tarcisio José de Arruda [UNESP]
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acrylic resin
Artificial teeth
Composite resin
Shear bond strength
Surface treatment
topic Acrylic resin
Artificial teeth
Composite resin
Shear bond strength
Surface treatment
description The purpose of this study was investigate the influence of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of two different type of artificial resin teeth repaired with composite resin. Fifteen (15) artificial teeth of each material (CR-composite resin and AR-acrylic resin) were divided into four parts and then embedded in acrylic resin. After, the teeth were separated into eight groups according to the surface treatments prior to the repair: control group (c), adhesive application (a), sandblasting (S) and sandblasting followed by adhesive application (Sa). Next, a composite resin cylinder (Ø = 0.95 mm e h = 2 mm) simulating a repair was built onto each surface. The specimens were submitted to a microshear bond test after 24 h, using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min, 50 kgf) until fracture. The data was subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test, with a significance level of 5%. ANOVA showed statistical difference for the interaction artificial teeth material* surface treatment (p = 0.001). CR teeth (29.79 ± 11.54 MPa) showed higher bond strength mean values than AR (18.48 ± 9.73 MPa). Regardless the artificial teeth material, Sa (36.92 ± 6.16 MPa) treatment showed the higher bond strength values. The highest bond strength value was found in CRSa (45.93 ± 7.13 MPa) and the lowest was found in ARc (5.38 ± 0.90 MPa). Based on the results, tooth material should be taken in account in order to choose the best surface treatment and achieve suitable bond strength values when a repair is necessary. For artificial teeth in acrylic resin, applying an adhesive system is the best procedure, with or without sandblasting the alumina particles. However, for artificial teeth in composite resin, an association of sandblasting followed by applying an adhesive system showed more promising bond strength values.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
2019-10-06T16:07:43Z
2019-10-06T16:07:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1
Applied Adhesion Science, v. 6, n. 1, 2018.
2196-4351
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188426
10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1
2-s2.0-85057480933
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188426
identifier_str_mv Applied Adhesion Science, v. 6, n. 1, 2018.
2196-4351
10.1186/s40563-018-0108-1
2-s2.0-85057480933
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Applied Adhesion Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129449352232960