El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220310 |
Resumo: | Due to its antimicrobial properties propolis has been utilised by man for millennia, however, only recently has its use as an agricultural antimicrobial agent been tested. The capacity of this product to activate plant defence mechanisms is highly promising, due to the large number of substances in its composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations and application times of ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) on powdery mildew (Podosphaera fuliginea) in cucumber crops, to establish the most suitable method for control and whether or not there is potential to induce plant defence mechanisms. The experiment was conducted in pots in a greenhouse. A completely randomised experimental design was employed, using a 6x3 factorial consisting of six concentrations (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4 and 8%) and three EEP application times (24 hours before pathogen inoculation, 24 hours after pathogen inoculation and at the onset of first symptoms of the disease), replicated four times. Evaluations for disease incidence and severity were made weekly. The experiment was repeated for a second crop, following the same methodology established in the first. We also evaluated the effect of different EEP concentrations on the activation of plant defence mechanisms, through the induction of phytoalexins in soybean (Glycine max) cotyledons. A significant interaction was observed between the factors (application time x concentration) for disease incidence. For the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for severity there was no interaction observed between the factors, however, we observed significant differences for the two factors separately. The AUDPC for incidence was less for the application 24 hours after pathogen inoculation, principally at the highest concentration. The 8% concentration of EEP controlled disease severity by 31.33 and 43.68% for the first and second crops, respectively. The application of the concentrations 24 hours before and 24 hours after pathogen inoculation showed less AUDPC for severity, but this difference was not significant for either crop. The EEP induced increasing phytoalexin levels in soybean cotyledons as the applied EEP concentration increased. Ethanol extracts of propolis could have potential for the control of powdery mildew, principally in cucumbers, through the preventive application of an 8% concentration. |
id |
UNSP_ff1100f7b341541df9e3bffc36c8cec3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220310 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepinoPropolis for the control of powdery mildew and the induction of phytoalexins in cucumberAlternative controlCucumberEthanol extract of propolisPodosphaera fuligineaDue to its antimicrobial properties propolis has been utilised by man for millennia, however, only recently has its use as an agricultural antimicrobial agent been tested. The capacity of this product to activate plant defence mechanisms is highly promising, due to the large number of substances in its composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations and application times of ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) on powdery mildew (Podosphaera fuliginea) in cucumber crops, to establish the most suitable method for control and whether or not there is potential to induce plant defence mechanisms. The experiment was conducted in pots in a greenhouse. A completely randomised experimental design was employed, using a 6x3 factorial consisting of six concentrations (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4 and 8%) and three EEP application times (24 hours before pathogen inoculation, 24 hours after pathogen inoculation and at the onset of first symptoms of the disease), replicated four times. Evaluations for disease incidence and severity were made weekly. The experiment was repeated for a second crop, following the same methodology established in the first. We also evaluated the effect of different EEP concentrations on the activation of plant defence mechanisms, through the induction of phytoalexins in soybean (Glycine max) cotyledons. A significant interaction was observed between the factors (application time x concentration) for disease incidence. For the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for severity there was no interaction observed between the factors, however, we observed significant differences for the two factors separately. The AUDPC for incidence was less for the application 24 hours after pathogen inoculation, principally at the highest concentration. The 8% concentration of EEP controlled disease severity by 31.33 and 43.68% for the first and second crops, respectively. The application of the concentrations 24 hours before and 24 hours after pathogen inoculation showed less AUDPC for severity, but this difference was not significant for either crop. The EEP induced increasing phytoalexin levels in soybean cotyledons as the applied EEP concentration increased. Ethanol extracts of propolis could have potential for the control of powdery mildew, principally in cucumbers, through the preventive application of an 8% concentration.Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Campus Lages. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Av Luiz de CamõesUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná Campus Pato Branco, Via do Conhecimento, Km 1Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná Campus Dois Vizinhos, Estrada para Boa Esperança, Km 04Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Campus Botucatu, Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/nºUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Campus Curitiba. R. Dos FuncionáriosUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Campus Botucatu, Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/nºUniversidade do Estado de Santa CatarinaUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecidados Santos, IdalmirWagner Júnior, AméricoHeck, Daniel Winter [UNESP]Flores, Mariana FaberPazolini, Kelly2022-04-28T19:00:52Z2022-04-28T19:00:52Z2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article39-47http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005Idesia, v. 33, n. 1, p. 39-47, 2015.0718-34290073-4675http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22031010.4067/S0718-342920150001000052-s2.0-84923050952Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIdesiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:00:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220310Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:40:09.934325Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino Propolis for the control of powdery mildew and the induction of phytoalexins in cucumber |
title |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino |
spellingShingle |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida Alternative control Cucumber Ethanol extract of propolis Podosphaera fuliginea |
title_short |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino |
title_full |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino |
title_fullStr |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino |
title_full_unstemmed |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino |
title_sort |
El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino |
author |
Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida |
author_facet |
Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida dos Santos, Idalmir Wagner Júnior, Américo Heck, Daniel Winter [UNESP] Flores, Mariana Faber Pazolini, Kelly |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
dos Santos, Idalmir Wagner Júnior, Américo Heck, Daniel Winter [UNESP] Flores, Mariana Faber Pazolini, Kelly |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida dos Santos, Idalmir Wagner Júnior, Américo Heck, Daniel Winter [UNESP] Flores, Mariana Faber Pazolini, Kelly |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Alternative control Cucumber Ethanol extract of propolis Podosphaera fuliginea |
topic |
Alternative control Cucumber Ethanol extract of propolis Podosphaera fuliginea |
description |
Due to its antimicrobial properties propolis has been utilised by man for millennia, however, only recently has its use as an agricultural antimicrobial agent been tested. The capacity of this product to activate plant defence mechanisms is highly promising, due to the large number of substances in its composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations and application times of ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) on powdery mildew (Podosphaera fuliginea) in cucumber crops, to establish the most suitable method for control and whether or not there is potential to induce plant defence mechanisms. The experiment was conducted in pots in a greenhouse. A completely randomised experimental design was employed, using a 6x3 factorial consisting of six concentrations (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4 and 8%) and three EEP application times (24 hours before pathogen inoculation, 24 hours after pathogen inoculation and at the onset of first symptoms of the disease), replicated four times. Evaluations for disease incidence and severity were made weekly. The experiment was repeated for a second crop, following the same methodology established in the first. We also evaluated the effect of different EEP concentrations on the activation of plant defence mechanisms, through the induction of phytoalexins in soybean (Glycine max) cotyledons. A significant interaction was observed between the factors (application time x concentration) for disease incidence. For the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for severity there was no interaction observed between the factors, however, we observed significant differences for the two factors separately. The AUDPC for incidence was less for the application 24 hours after pathogen inoculation, principally at the highest concentration. The 8% concentration of EEP controlled disease severity by 31.33 and 43.68% for the first and second crops, respectively. The application of the concentrations 24 hours before and 24 hours after pathogen inoculation showed less AUDPC for severity, but this difference was not significant for either crop. The EEP induced increasing phytoalexin levels in soybean cotyledons as the applied EEP concentration increased. Ethanol extracts of propolis could have potential for the control of powdery mildew, principally in cucumbers, through the preventive application of an 8% concentration. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01 2022-04-28T19:00:52Z 2022-04-28T19:00:52Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005 Idesia, v. 33, n. 1, p. 39-47, 2015. 0718-3429 0073-4675 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220310 10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005 2-s2.0-84923050952 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220310 |
identifier_str_mv |
Idesia, v. 33, n. 1, p. 39-47, 2015. 0718-3429 0073-4675 10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005 2-s2.0-84923050952 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Idesia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
39-47 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129448714698752 |