El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: dos Santos, Idalmir, Wagner Júnior, Américo, Heck, Daniel Winter [UNESP], Flores, Mariana Faber, Pazolini, Kelly
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220310
Resumo: Due to its antimicrobial properties propolis has been utilised by man for millennia, however, only recently has its use as an agricultural antimicrobial agent been tested. The capacity of this product to activate plant defence mechanisms is highly promising, due to the large number of substances in its composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations and application times of ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) on powdery mildew (Podosphaera fuliginea) in cucumber crops, to establish the most suitable method for control and whether or not there is potential to induce plant defence mechanisms. The experiment was conducted in pots in a greenhouse. A completely randomised experimental design was employed, using a 6x3 factorial consisting of six concentrations (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4 and 8%) and three EEP application times (24 hours before pathogen inoculation, 24 hours after pathogen inoculation and at the onset of first symptoms of the disease), replicated four times. Evaluations for disease incidence and severity were made weekly. The experiment was repeated for a second crop, following the same methodology established in the first. We also evaluated the effect of different EEP concentrations on the activation of plant defence mechanisms, through the induction of phytoalexins in soybean (Glycine max) cotyledons. A significant interaction was observed between the factors (application time x concentration) for disease incidence. For the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for severity there was no interaction observed between the factors, however, we observed significant differences for the two factors separately. The AUDPC for incidence was less for the application 24 hours after pathogen inoculation, principally at the highest concentration. The 8% concentration of EEP controlled disease severity by 31.33 and 43.68% for the first and second crops, respectively. The application of the concentrations 24 hours before and 24 hours after pathogen inoculation showed less AUDPC for severity, but this difference was not significant for either crop. The EEP induced increasing phytoalexin levels in soybean cotyledons as the applied EEP concentration increased. Ethanol extracts of propolis could have potential for the control of powdery mildew, principally in cucumbers, through the preventive application of an 8% concentration.
id UNSP_ff1100f7b341541df9e3bffc36c8cec3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220310
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepinoPropolis for the control of powdery mildew and the induction of phytoalexins in cucumberAlternative controlCucumberEthanol extract of propolisPodosphaera fuligineaDue to its antimicrobial properties propolis has been utilised by man for millennia, however, only recently has its use as an agricultural antimicrobial agent been tested. The capacity of this product to activate plant defence mechanisms is highly promising, due to the large number of substances in its composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations and application times of ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) on powdery mildew (Podosphaera fuliginea) in cucumber crops, to establish the most suitable method for control and whether or not there is potential to induce plant defence mechanisms. The experiment was conducted in pots in a greenhouse. A completely randomised experimental design was employed, using a 6x3 factorial consisting of six concentrations (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4 and 8%) and three EEP application times (24 hours before pathogen inoculation, 24 hours after pathogen inoculation and at the onset of first symptoms of the disease), replicated four times. Evaluations for disease incidence and severity were made weekly. The experiment was repeated for a second crop, following the same methodology established in the first. We also evaluated the effect of different EEP concentrations on the activation of plant defence mechanisms, through the induction of phytoalexins in soybean (Glycine max) cotyledons. A significant interaction was observed between the factors (application time x concentration) for disease incidence. For the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for severity there was no interaction observed between the factors, however, we observed significant differences for the two factors separately. The AUDPC for incidence was less for the application 24 hours after pathogen inoculation, principally at the highest concentration. The 8% concentration of EEP controlled disease severity by 31.33 and 43.68% for the first and second crops, respectively. The application of the concentrations 24 hours before and 24 hours after pathogen inoculation showed less AUDPC for severity, but this difference was not significant for either crop. The EEP induced increasing phytoalexin levels in soybean cotyledons as the applied EEP concentration increased. Ethanol extracts of propolis could have potential for the control of powdery mildew, principally in cucumbers, through the preventive application of an 8% concentration.Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Campus Lages. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Av Luiz de CamõesUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná Campus Pato Branco, Via do Conhecimento, Km 1Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná Campus Dois Vizinhos, Estrada para Boa Esperança, Km 04Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Campus Botucatu, Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/nºUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Campus Curitiba. R. Dos FuncionáriosUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Campus Botucatu, Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/nºUniversidade do Estado de Santa CatarinaUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecidados Santos, IdalmirWagner Júnior, AméricoHeck, Daniel Winter [UNESP]Flores, Mariana FaberPazolini, Kelly2022-04-28T19:00:52Z2022-04-28T19:00:52Z2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article39-47http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005Idesia, v. 33, n. 1, p. 39-47, 2015.0718-34290073-4675http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22031010.4067/S0718-342920150001000052-s2.0-84923050952Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIdesiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:00:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220310Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:40:09.934325Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
Propolis for the control of powdery mildew and the induction of phytoalexins in cucumber
title El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
spellingShingle El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida
Alternative control
Cucumber
Ethanol extract of propolis
Podosphaera fuliginea
title_short El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
title_full El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
title_fullStr El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
title_full_unstemmed El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
title_sort El propóleo para el control de oídio y la inducción de fitoalexinas en pepino
author Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida
author_facet Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida
dos Santos, Idalmir
Wagner Júnior, Américo
Heck, Daniel Winter [UNESP]
Flores, Mariana Faber
Pazolini, Kelly
author_role author
author2 dos Santos, Idalmir
Wagner Júnior, Américo
Heck, Daniel Winter [UNESP]
Flores, Mariana Faber
Pazolini, Kelly
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guginski-Piva, Claudia Aparecida
dos Santos, Idalmir
Wagner Júnior, Américo
Heck, Daniel Winter [UNESP]
Flores, Mariana Faber
Pazolini, Kelly
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alternative control
Cucumber
Ethanol extract of propolis
Podosphaera fuliginea
topic Alternative control
Cucumber
Ethanol extract of propolis
Podosphaera fuliginea
description Due to its antimicrobial properties propolis has been utilised by man for millennia, however, only recently has its use as an agricultural antimicrobial agent been tested. The capacity of this product to activate plant defence mechanisms is highly promising, due to the large number of substances in its composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations and application times of ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) on powdery mildew (Podosphaera fuliginea) in cucumber crops, to establish the most suitable method for control and whether or not there is potential to induce plant defence mechanisms. The experiment was conducted in pots in a greenhouse. A completely randomised experimental design was employed, using a 6x3 factorial consisting of six concentrations (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4 and 8%) and three EEP application times (24 hours before pathogen inoculation, 24 hours after pathogen inoculation and at the onset of first symptoms of the disease), replicated four times. Evaluations for disease incidence and severity were made weekly. The experiment was repeated for a second crop, following the same methodology established in the first. We also evaluated the effect of different EEP concentrations on the activation of plant defence mechanisms, through the induction of phytoalexins in soybean (Glycine max) cotyledons. A significant interaction was observed between the factors (application time x concentration) for disease incidence. For the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for severity there was no interaction observed between the factors, however, we observed significant differences for the two factors separately. The AUDPC for incidence was less for the application 24 hours after pathogen inoculation, principally at the highest concentration. The 8% concentration of EEP controlled disease severity by 31.33 and 43.68% for the first and second crops, respectively. The application of the concentrations 24 hours before and 24 hours after pathogen inoculation showed less AUDPC for severity, but this difference was not significant for either crop. The EEP induced increasing phytoalexin levels in soybean cotyledons as the applied EEP concentration increased. Ethanol extracts of propolis could have potential for the control of powdery mildew, principally in cucumbers, through the preventive application of an 8% concentration.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
2022-04-28T19:00:52Z
2022-04-28T19:00:52Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005
Idesia, v. 33, n. 1, p. 39-47, 2015.
0718-3429
0073-4675
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220310
10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005
2-s2.0-84923050952
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220310
identifier_str_mv Idesia, v. 33, n. 1, p. 39-47, 2015.
0718-3429
0073-4675
10.4067/S0718-34292015000100005
2-s2.0-84923050952
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Idesia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 39-47
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129448714698752