US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Milani, Livia Peres [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2019430100006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211406
Resumo: Academic literature on US Foreign Policy to South America usually states its lack of attention to the region in the post 9/11 period. I aim to problematize this assertion through an analysis of US regional security policy. Therefore, I consider data referring to military and economic assistance, arms transfers, and the SOUTHCOM position towards its area of responsibility, as well as official documents and diplomatic cables. I conclude that, although the region was not a priority, a waning in US actions or a moment of neglect in its policy towards it was likewise not observed. From a historical perspective, the area was never the main focus of attention, but there is a specialized bureaucracy that works on the region to maintain US hegemony. Therefore, the investigation indicates that Latin American assertiveness during the 2000s was caused primarily by the conjunction of the ascension of leftist governments and quest for autonomy, as well as by Chinese and Russian involvement in Latin America, but not by US neglect. The article is divided into six sections, including the introduction and final remarks. Following the introduction, I analyse the academic literature regarding USA-Latin American relations in the second section, the US assistance in the third, the SOUTHCOM postures in the fourth, and the strategies deployed by the USA regarding great powers and arms transfers in the fifth. Finally, I present the final remarks.
id UNSP_ff4dc68f4e49be7dc2c4f854c38c9e8d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211406
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?Política Externa dos EUA para a América do Sul desde o 11 de Setembro: Negligência ou Militarização?: USA-Latin Americamilitary to military relationsforeign policyinternational securityhegemonymilitarisation: Estados Unidos-América Latinarelações militares-militarespolítica externasegurança internacionalhegemoniamilitarizaçãoAcademic literature on US Foreign Policy to South America usually states its lack of attention to the region in the post 9/11 period. I aim to problematize this assertion through an analysis of US regional security policy. Therefore, I consider data referring to military and economic assistance, arms transfers, and the SOUTHCOM position towards its area of responsibility, as well as official documents and diplomatic cables. I conclude that, although the region was not a priority, a waning in US actions or a moment of neglect in its policy towards it was likewise not observed. From a historical perspective, the area was never the main focus of attention, but there is a specialized bureaucracy that works on the region to maintain US hegemony. Therefore, the investigation indicates that Latin American assertiveness during the 2000s was caused primarily by the conjunction of the ascension of leftist governments and quest for autonomy, as well as by Chinese and Russian involvement in Latin America, but not by US neglect. The article is divided into six sections, including the introduction and final remarks. Following the introduction, I analyse the academic literature regarding USA-Latin American relations in the second section, the US assistance in the third, the SOUTHCOM postures in the fourth, and the strategies deployed by the USA regarding great powers and arms transfers in the fifth. Finally, I present the final remarks.A literatura acadêmica sobre a política externa dos EUA para a América do Sul geralmente afirma uma falta de atenção para esta região no período pós-11 de setembro. Pretendo problematizar essa afirmação por meio de uma análise da política de segurança regional dos Estados Unidos. Considero os dados referentes à assistência militar e econômica, transferência de armas e a posição do SOUTHCOM em relação à sua área de responsabilidade, bem como documentos oficiais e cabos diplomáticos. Concluo que, embora a região não tenha sido uma prioridade, não houve um enfraquecimento das ações dos Estados Unidos ou um momento de abandono. Do ponto de vista histórico, a área nunca foi o foco principal das atenções, mas há uma burocracia especializada que trabalha para manter a hegemonia dos EUA. Portanto, a investigação indica que a assertividade latino-americana durante os anos 2000 foi causada principalmente pela conjunção da ascensão dos governos de esquerda e centro-esquerda e pela busca por autonomia e envolvimento chinês e russo na América Latina, não por negligência dos EUA. O artigo está dividido em seis seções, incluindo a introdução e as considerações finais. Após a introdução, a segunda seção é dedicada à análise da literatura acadêmica, a terceira ao estudo da assistência dos Estados Unidos, a quarta examina as posturas do SOUTHCOM e a quinta seção investiga as estratégias dos Estados Unidos em relação a grandes potências e transferências de armas. Finalmente, as considerações finais são apresentadas.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)San Tiago Dantas Graduate Program in International Relations (UNESP/UNICAMP/PUC-SP)San Tiago Dantas Graduate Program in International Relations (UNESP/UNICAMP/PUC-SP)FAPESP: 2017/00661-8; 2018/03231-7Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações InternacionaisUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Milani, Livia Peres [UNESP]2021-07-14T10:23:55Z2021-07-14T10:23:55Z2021-01-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article121-146application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2019430100006Contexto Internacional. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, v. 43, n. 1, p. 121-146, 2021.0102-85291982-0240http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21140610.1590/S0102-8529.2019430100006S0102-85292021000100121S0102-85292021000100121.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengContexto Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-24T06:06:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211406Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:48:44.222439Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?
Política Externa dos EUA para a América do Sul desde o 11 de Setembro: Negligência ou Militarização?
title US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?
spellingShingle US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?
Milani, Livia Peres [UNESP]
: USA-Latin America
military to military relations
foreign policy
international security
hegemony
militarisation
: Estados Unidos-América Latina
relações militares-militares
política externa
segurança internacional
hegemonia
militarização
title_short US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?
title_full US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?
title_fullStr US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?
title_full_unstemmed US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?
title_sort US Foreign Policy to South America since 9/11: Neglect or Militarisation?
author Milani, Livia Peres [UNESP]
author_facet Milani, Livia Peres [UNESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Milani, Livia Peres [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv : USA-Latin America
military to military relations
foreign policy
international security
hegemony
militarisation
: Estados Unidos-América Latina
relações militares-militares
política externa
segurança internacional
hegemonia
militarização
topic : USA-Latin America
military to military relations
foreign policy
international security
hegemony
militarisation
: Estados Unidos-América Latina
relações militares-militares
política externa
segurança internacional
hegemonia
militarização
description Academic literature on US Foreign Policy to South America usually states its lack of attention to the region in the post 9/11 period. I aim to problematize this assertion through an analysis of US regional security policy. Therefore, I consider data referring to military and economic assistance, arms transfers, and the SOUTHCOM position towards its area of responsibility, as well as official documents and diplomatic cables. I conclude that, although the region was not a priority, a waning in US actions or a moment of neglect in its policy towards it was likewise not observed. From a historical perspective, the area was never the main focus of attention, but there is a specialized bureaucracy that works on the region to maintain US hegemony. Therefore, the investigation indicates that Latin American assertiveness during the 2000s was caused primarily by the conjunction of the ascension of leftist governments and quest for autonomy, as well as by Chinese and Russian involvement in Latin America, but not by US neglect. The article is divided into six sections, including the introduction and final remarks. Following the introduction, I analyse the academic literature regarding USA-Latin American relations in the second section, the US assistance in the third, the SOUTHCOM postures in the fourth, and the strategies deployed by the USA regarding great powers and arms transfers in the fifth. Finally, I present the final remarks.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-14T10:23:55Z
2021-07-14T10:23:55Z
2021-01-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2019430100006
Contexto Internacional. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, v. 43, n. 1, p. 121-146, 2021.
0102-8529
1982-0240
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211406
10.1590/S0102-8529.2019430100006
S0102-85292021000100121
S0102-85292021000100121.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2019430100006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211406
identifier_str_mv Contexto Internacional. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, v. 43, n. 1, p. 121-146, 2021.
0102-8529
1982-0240
10.1590/S0102-8529.2019430100006
S0102-85292021000100121
S0102-85292021000100121.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 121-146
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128565363867648