Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abal, Felipe Cittolin
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
Texto Completo: http://10.0.217.128:8080/jspui/handle/tede/152
Resumo: This work focuses on the study about two Nazi criminals found in Brazil: Franz Stangl and Gustav Wagner, with the will to research who this Nazis were, which crimes they commited e how they arrived in Brazil, besides analyzing the extradition processes against them and in what way impacted on the press of the southeast region of Brazil the discovery of this Nazis in Brazil and the results of the extradition processes. Stangl was Commander of Sobibor and Treblinka death camps, and also worked in the euthanasia institute of Hartheim, and participated actively on the murder of thousands of persons, specially Jews. Wagner, that also had worked in Hartheim, was second in charge on Sobibor death camp, being known for his cruelty and having assassinated personally dozens of persons of Hebrew origin. Both, after the war, escaped from Europe with the aid of members of the catholic church and, after a period in East Asia, they fleed to Brazil. Stangl was found in the country in 1967 and suffered extradition requests from the Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, and Poland, and, after the trial of this requests by the Brazilian Supreme Court, the Nazi was turned over to Germany. Wagner was found in Brazil eleven years after and also had his extradition requested by the Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, Poland and Israel. The understanding of the Brazilian Supreme Court on the Wagner case, however, was different, being that the extradition of the Nazi was denied. The research concentrated, in a first moment, in analyzing both the subjects and their crimes, as well as the places where they committed the felonies that they were charged to, after, describe how the Nazis were found in Brazil and the impact of these facts in the newspapers from the southeast region of Brazil, being able to, at this moment, start to study the treatment given to the institute of extradition on the Brazilian laws of the time of the judgments, the processes and their results, ending with an analysis about the repercussion of the results of the trials in the newspapers from São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. In the execution of the research were utilized specific bibliography, interviews with survivors from Sobibor and Treblinka death camps, the extradition processes and newspapers of the time. This steps were made to solve the main problem of the research: What were the legal reasons that based the different results on both trials on that historical moment in front of the apparent equality of the cases? It came to the conclusion that this happened because of the strictly legalist analysis made by the Brazilian Supreme Court in the Wagner case, despite the international laws against criminals that participated in genocide and justice itself.
id UPF-1_804a160a30c4a8dbf5036220c5c60c9b
oai_identifier_str oai:tede.upf.br:tede/152
network_acronym_str UPF-1
network_name_str Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
repository_id_str
spelling Santin, Janaína RigoCPF:80578306034http://lattes.cnpq.br/3213900043864696CPF:82074437072http://lattes.cnpq.br/2584975972936590Abal, Felipe Cittolin2018-01-10T17:53:53Z2013-03-112012-08-17http://10.0.217.128:8080/jspui/handle/tede/152This work focuses on the study about two Nazi criminals found in Brazil: Franz Stangl and Gustav Wagner, with the will to research who this Nazis were, which crimes they commited e how they arrived in Brazil, besides analyzing the extradition processes against them and in what way impacted on the press of the southeast region of Brazil the discovery of this Nazis in Brazil and the results of the extradition processes. Stangl was Commander of Sobibor and Treblinka death camps, and also worked in the euthanasia institute of Hartheim, and participated actively on the murder of thousands of persons, specially Jews. Wagner, that also had worked in Hartheim, was second in charge on Sobibor death camp, being known for his cruelty and having assassinated personally dozens of persons of Hebrew origin. Both, after the war, escaped from Europe with the aid of members of the catholic church and, after a period in East Asia, they fleed to Brazil. Stangl was found in the country in 1967 and suffered extradition requests from the Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, and Poland, and, after the trial of this requests by the Brazilian Supreme Court, the Nazi was turned over to Germany. Wagner was found in Brazil eleven years after and also had his extradition requested by the Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, Poland and Israel. The understanding of the Brazilian Supreme Court on the Wagner case, however, was different, being that the extradition of the Nazi was denied. The research concentrated, in a first moment, in analyzing both the subjects and their crimes, as well as the places where they committed the felonies that they were charged to, after, describe how the Nazis were found in Brazil and the impact of these facts in the newspapers from the southeast region of Brazil, being able to, at this moment, start to study the treatment given to the institute of extradition on the Brazilian laws of the time of the judgments, the processes and their results, ending with an analysis about the repercussion of the results of the trials in the newspapers from São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. In the execution of the research were utilized specific bibliography, interviews with survivors from Sobibor and Treblinka death camps, the extradition processes and newspapers of the time. This steps were made to solve the main problem of the research: What were the legal reasons that based the different results on both trials on that historical moment in front of the apparent equality of the cases? It came to the conclusion that this happened because of the strictly legalist analysis made by the Brazilian Supreme Court in the Wagner case, despite the international laws against criminals that participated in genocide and justice itself.O presente trabalho se foca no estudo acerca de dois criminosos nazistas encontrados no Brasil: Franz Stangl e Gustav Wagner, com o anseio de pesquisar quem eram estes nazistas, quais crimes cometeram e como chegaram ao Brasil, além de analisar os processos de extradição realizados contra eles e de que forma a descoberta destes nazistas no país e os resultados dos processos de extradição impactaram na imprensa do sudeste. Stangl foi Comandante dos campos de extermínio de Sobibor e Treblinka, além de ter trabalhado anteriormente no Instituto de eutanásia de Hartheim, sendo que, desta forma, participou ativamente do assassinato de milhares de pessoas, em especial judeus. Wagner, que também havia laborado em Hartheim, foi sub-comandante do campo de extermínio de Sobibor, sendo conhecido por sua crueldade e tendo assassinado pessoalmente dezenas de pessoas de origem hebraica. Ambos, após o fim da guerra, fugiram da Europa com auxílio de membros da igreja católica e, após um período na Ásia Ocidental, acabaram por se refugiar no Brasil. Stangl foi encontrado no país em 1967 e sofreu pedidos de extradição da República Federal da Alemanha, Áustria e Polônia, sendo que, após o julgamento destes pedidos pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, o nazista foi entregue à Alemanha. Wagner foi encontrado no Brasil onze anos depois e também teve sua extradição solicitada pelos governos da República Federal da Alemanha, Áustria, Polônia e Israel. O entendimento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no caso Wagner, porém, foi diferente, sendo que a extradição do nazista foi negada. A pesquisa se concentrou, em um primeiro momento, na análise de ambos os sujeitos e seus crimes, assim como os locais onde cometeram os delitos de que foram acusados para, posteriormente, abordar como os nazistas foram encontrados no Brasil e o impacto destes fatos nos jornais do sudeste. No último momento do trabalho, passou-se a estudar o tratamento dado ao instituto da extradição no ordenamento pátrio vigente à época dos julgamentos, os processos em si e seus resultados, finalizando com uma análise acerca da repercussão do resultado dos julgamentos nos jornais de São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro. Para a realização da pesquisa foi utilizada bibliografia específica, entrevistas realizadas com sobreviventes dos campos de extermínio de Treblinka e Sobibor, os processos de extradição na íntegra e jornais da época. Estas etapas foram realizadas para buscar subsídios para se responder o problema principal da pesquisa: Quais foram os motivos jurídicos que embasaram os resultados diferentes nos dois julgamentos naquele momento histórico, diante da aparente equidade dos casos? Chegou-se, então, à conclusão de que isto ocorreu em virtude da análise estritamente legalista realizada pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal do caso Wagner, em detrimento das normas internacionais de repressão aos criminosos que participaram de genocídio e da própria justiça.Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-10T17:53:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2012Felipe_Cittolin_Abal.pdf: 1347340 bytes, checksum: cd9c7bfbf4479bf1e831d5c94d813a39 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-17application/pdfporUniversidade de Passo FundoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em HistóriaUPFBrasilInstituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas – IFCHExtradiçãoImprensa - BrasilNazistasGuerra Mundial, 1939-1945Crime de guerraExtraditionPress - BrazilNazisWorld War, 1939-1945War crimesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIAVisitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis87965432101600600600123478521450321654987700info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFORIGINAL2012Felipe_Cittolin_Abal.pdfapplication/pdf1347340http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/tede/152/1/2012Felipe_Cittolin_Abal.pdfcd9c7bfbf4479bf1e831d5c94d813a39MD51tede/1522018-03-12 20:36:26.085oai:tede.upf.br:tede/152Biblioteca Digital de Teses e DissertaçõesPUBhttp://tede.upf.br/oai/requestbiblio@upf.br || bio@upf.br || cas@upf.br || car@upf.br || lve@upf.br || sar@upf.br || sol@upf.br || upfmundi@upf.br || jucelei@upf.bropendoar:2018-03-12T23:36:26Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica
title Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica
spellingShingle Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica
Abal, Felipe Cittolin
Extradição
Imprensa - Brasil
Nazistas
Guerra Mundial, 1939-1945
Crime de guerra
Extradition
Press - Brazil
Nazis
World War, 1939-1945
War crimes
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
title_short Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica
title_full Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica
title_fullStr Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica
title_full_unstemmed Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica
title_sort Visitantes indesejados : os pedidos de extradição de Franz Stange e Gustav Wagner em uma análise histórico jurídica
author Abal, Felipe Cittolin
author_facet Abal, Felipe Cittolin
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Santin, Janaína Rigo
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv CPF:80578306034
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3213900043864696
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv CPF:82074437072
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2584975972936590
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abal, Felipe Cittolin
contributor_str_mv Santin, Janaína Rigo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Extradição
Imprensa - Brasil
Nazistas
Guerra Mundial, 1939-1945
Crime de guerra
topic Extradição
Imprensa - Brasil
Nazistas
Guerra Mundial, 1939-1945
Crime de guerra
Extradition
Press - Brazil
Nazis
World War, 1939-1945
War crimes
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Extradition
Press - Brazil
Nazis
World War, 1939-1945
War crimes
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
description This work focuses on the study about two Nazi criminals found in Brazil: Franz Stangl and Gustav Wagner, with the will to research who this Nazis were, which crimes they commited e how they arrived in Brazil, besides analyzing the extradition processes against them and in what way impacted on the press of the southeast region of Brazil the discovery of this Nazis in Brazil and the results of the extradition processes. Stangl was Commander of Sobibor and Treblinka death camps, and also worked in the euthanasia institute of Hartheim, and participated actively on the murder of thousands of persons, specially Jews. Wagner, that also had worked in Hartheim, was second in charge on Sobibor death camp, being known for his cruelty and having assassinated personally dozens of persons of Hebrew origin. Both, after the war, escaped from Europe with the aid of members of the catholic church and, after a period in East Asia, they fleed to Brazil. Stangl was found in the country in 1967 and suffered extradition requests from the Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, and Poland, and, after the trial of this requests by the Brazilian Supreme Court, the Nazi was turned over to Germany. Wagner was found in Brazil eleven years after and also had his extradition requested by the Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, Poland and Israel. The understanding of the Brazilian Supreme Court on the Wagner case, however, was different, being that the extradition of the Nazi was denied. The research concentrated, in a first moment, in analyzing both the subjects and their crimes, as well as the places where they committed the felonies that they were charged to, after, describe how the Nazis were found in Brazil and the impact of these facts in the newspapers from the southeast region of Brazil, being able to, at this moment, start to study the treatment given to the institute of extradition on the Brazilian laws of the time of the judgments, the processes and their results, ending with an analysis about the repercussion of the results of the trials in the newspapers from São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. In the execution of the research were utilized specific bibliography, interviews with survivors from Sobibor and Treblinka death camps, the extradition processes and newspapers of the time. This steps were made to solve the main problem of the research: What were the legal reasons that based the different results on both trials on that historical moment in front of the apparent equality of the cases? It came to the conclusion that this happened because of the strictly legalist analysis made by the Brazilian Supreme Court in the Wagner case, despite the international laws against criminals that participated in genocide and justice itself.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-08-17
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2013-03-11
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-01-10T17:53:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://10.0.217.128:8080/jspui/handle/tede/152
url http://10.0.217.128:8080/jspui/handle/tede/152
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 87965432101
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 123478521450
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 321654987700
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em História
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UPF
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas – IFCH
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
collection Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/tede/152/1/2012Felipe_Cittolin_Abal.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cd9c7bfbf4479bf1e831d5c94d813a39
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblio@upf.br || bio@upf.br || cas@upf.br || car@upf.br || lve@upf.br || sar@upf.br || sol@upf.br || upfmundi@upf.br || jucelei@upf.br
_version_ 1801045431713529856