Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hecktheuer, Pedro Abib
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Schimidt Siqueira Garcia, Denise
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/10046
Resumo: The research explores development as idealized by Amartya Sen and the theories of representative and participatory democracy to establish the premise that the occurrence of development depends on popular participation in decisions on relevant issues. Development depends on the exercise of liberties, and political freedom is the premise for the exercise of others. Therefore, the text discusses whether mechanisms currently provided for direct participation of the population in our democracy are adequate for the popular control of legislative process. From this analysis, important considerations were extracted, such as the important narrative that favors popular participation in the Federal Constitution, and the discrepant discredit given to the formal mechanisms of participation by legislators, excluding the people from the deliberations on legislation that deal with social rights. The conclusion is that the non-use of the formal mechanisms of popular participation in Brazil is an obstacle to development. The methodology used was a bibliographical review, documental and empirica.
id UPF-4_3bdd9ef45c64241e47b2288323f08846
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.upf.br:article/10046
network_acronym_str UPF-4
network_name_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in BrazilLimite à participação popular no processo legislativo como um obstáculo ao desenvolvimento no BrasilThe research explores development as idealized by Amartya Sen and the theories of representative and participatory democracy to establish the premise that the occurrence of development depends on popular participation in decisions on relevant issues. Development depends on the exercise of liberties, and political freedom is the premise for the exercise of others. Therefore, the text discusses whether mechanisms currently provided for direct participation of the population in our democracy are adequate for the popular control of legislative process. From this analysis, important considerations were extracted, such as the important narrative that favors popular participation in the Federal Constitution, and the discrepant discredit given to the formal mechanisms of participation by legislators, excluding the people from the deliberations on legislation that deal with social rights. The conclusion is that the non-use of the formal mechanisms of popular participation in Brazil is an obstacle to development. The methodology used was a bibliographical review, documental and empirica.A pesquisa explora o desenvolvimento como forjado por Amartya Sen, para estabelecer a premissa de que o desenvolvimento depende da participação popular em decisões sobre questões relevantes. O desenvolvimento depende do exercício de liberdades, e a liberdade política é a premissa para o exercício de outras. Por isso, o texto discute se os mecanismos atualmente previstos de participação direta da população em nossa democracia são adequados para o controle popular do processo legislativo. Dessa análise extraíram-se considerações, como a importante narrativa que privilegia a participação popular na Constituição Federal, e o discrepante desprestígio dado aos mecanismos formais de participação por parte dos legisladores, excluindo o povo das deliberações sobre legislações que tratam dos direitos sociais. A conclusão é a de que a não utilização dos mecanismos formais de participação popular no Brasil é um entrave ao desenvolvimento. A metodologia utilizada foi a de revisão bibliográfica, documental e empírica.Universidade de Passo Fundo2019-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/1004610.5335/rjd.v32i2.10046Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 06-45Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 06-452238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFporhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/10046/114114839Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHecktheuer, Pedro AbibSchimidt Siqueira Garcia, Denise2019-11-19T02:19:19Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/10046Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2019-11-19T02:19:19Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil
Limite à participação popular no processo legislativo como um obstáculo ao desenvolvimento no Brasil
title Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil
spellingShingle Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil
Hecktheuer, Pedro Abib
title_short Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil
title_full Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil
title_fullStr Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil
title_sort Limit to popular participation in the legislative process as obstacle to development in Brazil
author Hecktheuer, Pedro Abib
author_facet Hecktheuer, Pedro Abib
Schimidt Siqueira Garcia, Denise
author_role author
author2 Schimidt Siqueira Garcia, Denise
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hecktheuer, Pedro Abib
Schimidt Siqueira Garcia, Denise
description The research explores development as idealized by Amartya Sen and the theories of representative and participatory democracy to establish the premise that the occurrence of development depends on popular participation in decisions on relevant issues. Development depends on the exercise of liberties, and political freedom is the premise for the exercise of others. Therefore, the text discusses whether mechanisms currently provided for direct participation of the population in our democracy are adequate for the popular control of legislative process. From this analysis, important considerations were extracted, such as the important narrative that favors popular participation in the Federal Constitution, and the discrepant discredit given to the formal mechanisms of participation by legislators, excluding the people from the deliberations on legislation that deal with social rights. The conclusion is that the non-use of the formal mechanisms of popular participation in Brazil is an obstacle to development. The methodology used was a bibliographical review, documental and empirica.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/10046
10.5335/rjd.v32i2.10046
url http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/10046
identifier_str_mv 10.5335/rjd.v32i2.10046
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/10046/114114839
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 06-45
Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 06-45
2238-3212
1413-7038
reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
collection Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com
_version_ 1776750980852875264

Registros relacionados